Check Out Our Shop
Page 379 of 626 FirstFirst ... 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 ... LastLast
Results 9,451 to 9,475 of 15626

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #9451
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    60
    Thanks guys! Doesn't sound like Wren ti's are for me... appreciate the help.

  2. #9452
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Where full grown men pretend to be cowboys
    Posts
    637
    Quote Originally Posted by jaywood View Post
    These would not replace, just compliment. But wondering if I'd realistically ever reach for them over my Woods. I'm not a huge 100% full speed charger. I'm more of a play around, have fun, go find the wind lip kickers type of skiier.
    The wren you mentioned is the most playful shape to date, but still rewards forward, fast, deliberate skiing more than anything, especially with that stiff ti layup. Much less playful than your WD 108.

    Maybe look for a Jeffrey/Kartel? My DD is also WD108, but I still grab my 17-18 Kartel 108s 5-10 times a year for dedicated dick around days (low tide, skiing with wife, spring slush bumps).

  3. #9453
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,783
    Quote Originally Posted by jaywood View Post
    Quick question -

    19/20 Wren 108ti with a stiffer layup. 189's.
    6'0" 175lb with no gear
    West coast skiier. Utah Alta Snowbird, Mammoth mainly.


    Am I getting myself in trouble? Or will I enjoy these things.


    Currently on Woods 108.
    Sounds like you've already made your decision, but if you're not regularly pointing it down big terrain in junky snow and wishing for more, you probably don't need them. That being said, I really liked the Wren 108ti when I demo'd them. If I didn't already have a pair of regular 108s, I'd be really tempted.

  4. #9454
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Portland by way of Bozeman
    Posts
    4,294
    Nothing new or groundbreaking to add here. I spent the day on Woodsman 108 yesterday and FKNA, what a rad ski!

    I've long lamented the fact that ON3P didn't have what I thought should be in their offering; a beefy Salomon Rocker2 108. I know, I know, not their jam, but the R2 108 was a really fun ski, if not really soft and completely lacking in the toughness required to ski hard. Sure, there was the Kartel, but I never quite meshed with it and I didn't like the exaggerated tail rocker.

    Enter the WD108. Plenty of early rise, a playful shape, and a flat-ish tail with just enough rise to shorten up the effective edge. Quick edge and burly and damp enough to point 'em straight or lay down some trenches. These things rip. In a way, they are like my BillyGoats, only more suited for smaller new snow days. The WD 108 doesn't quite have the quickness of the R2108 and it certainly isn't as forgiving, but it's damn close. And as an upside, a fuckton more resistant to sneaker rocks, sharks, and early season mishaps.

    I'm way more stoked on these than I thought I'd be. bought them as an impulse and because I'm slut for ON3P, having owned seven or eight pairs over the years.

    As a shout-out to the ON3P crew, the mount line on this year's iteration is about perfect. I added another coat of wax and ripped them all day. I think only a small amount of tip and tail detuning is needed. Otherwise, these skis are finished beautifully from the factory. I take a great sense of pride skiing these works of art, knowing they are built in my hometown.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	oetG87w.jpg 
Views:	173 
Size:	206.4 KB 
ID:	352851

    GIT SUM!!

  5. #9455
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,226
    Quote Originally Posted by jaywood View Post
    These would not replace, just compliment. But wondering if I'd realistically ever reach for them over my Woods. I'm not a huge 100% full speed charger. I'm more of a play around, have fun, go find the wind lip kickers type of skiier.
    Based on this I think you should get the 191 Kartel/Jeffrey 108. It is the bees’ nuts.

  6. #9456
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    459
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobcat Sig View Post
    Nothing new or groundbreaking to add here. I spent the day on Woodsman 108 yesterday and FKNA, what a rad ski!

    I've long lamented the fact that ON3P didn't have what I thought should be in their offering; a beefy Salomon Rocker2 108. I know, I know, not their jam, but the R2 108 was a really fun ski, if not really soft and completely lacking in the toughness required to ski hard. Sure, there was the Kartel, but I never quite meshed with it and I didn't like the exaggerated tail rocker.

    Enter the WD108. Plenty of early rise, a playful shape, and a flat-ish tail with just enough rise to shorten up the effective edge. Quick edge and burly and damp enough to point 'em straight or lay down some trenches. These things rip. In a way, they are like my BillyGoats, only more suited for smaller new snow days. The WD 108 doesn't quite have the quickness of the R2108 and it certainly isn't as forgiving, but it's damn close. And as an upside, a fuckton more resistant to sneaker rocks, sharks, and early season mishaps.

    I'm way more stoked on these than I thought I'd be. bought them as an impulse and because I'm slut for ON3P, having owned seven or eight pairs over the years.

    As a shout-out to the ON3P crew, the mount line on this year's iteration is about perfect. I added another coat of wax and ripped them all day. I think only a small amount of tip and tail detuning is needed. Otherwise, these skis are finished beautifully from the factory. I take a great sense of pride skiing these works of art, knowing they are built in my hometown.

    GIT SUM!!
    Nice! Can't wait to get out on mine for the first time. Likely at Bridger at this point. Find out if my ghetto spinner fixed worked.

  7. #9457
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Portland by way of Bozeman
    Posts
    4,294
    Quote Originally Posted by mtskibum16 View Post
    Nice! Can't wait to get out on mine for the first time. Likely at Bridger at this point. Find out if my ghetto spinner fixed worked.
    Huck your meat off The Diving Board and you'll know pretty quickly

  8. #9458
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    On the mountain
    Posts
    775
    Quote Originally Posted by lucknau View Post
    Based on this I think you should get the 191 Kartel/Jeffrey 108. It is the bees’ nuts.
    Yes, yes it sure is....

  9. #9459
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    459
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobcat Sig View Post
    Huck your meat off The Diving Board and you'll know pretty quickly
    If there's enough snow for me to be hucking my meat or hiking I'll probably be on BGs. haha

  10. #9460
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobcat Sig View Post
    I've long lamented the fact that ON3P didn't have what I thought should be in their offering; a beefy Salomon Rocker2 108. I know, I know, not their jam, but the R2 108 was a really fun ski, if not really soft and completely lacking in the toughness required to ski hard. Sure, there was the Kartel, but I never quite meshed with it and I didn't like the exaggerated tail rocker.

    Enter the WD108. Plenty of early rise, a playful shape, and a flat-ish tail with just enough rise to shorten up the effective edge. Quick edge and burly and damp enough to point 'em straight or lay down some trenches. These things rip. In a way, they are like my BillyGoats, only more suited for smaller new snow days. The WD 108 doesn't quite have the quickness of the R2108 and it certainly isn't as forgiving, but it's damn close. And as an upside, a fuckton more resistant to sneaker rocks, sharks, and early season mishaps.
    Interesting. I've been searching for the replacement for my R2 108s for years, honestly really like the ski. I tried to replace it last year with a Praxis MVP but that didn't click. This year I'm trying the Jeffery 108 but what you're saying here about the woodsman is pretty interesting....we'll see if the Jeffery clicks.

    Also pretty funny that you talk about durability...I totally shredded the bases of my R2s yesterday, they look like a little kid scribbled on them.

  11. #9461
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    46

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Finally got these out for some turns after work today. Already knew I loved the J108s but damn these J116s had me with a permanent shit eating grin even with poop snow (pun intended).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1561.JPG 
Views:	180 
Size:	213.3 KB 
ID:	352899


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by PaulC08; 12-15-2020 at 04:56 PM.

  12. #9462
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,483

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Just want to say, I wanted to, but I just did not care for the Hackel Pro top sheet at all. Saw someone skiing em today and they look really, REALLY good! ON3P top sheets just always look so damn good in person!!
    Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!

  13. #9463
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    62
    ^ Yup.
    I'm sure they would sell a few more skis simply by adding some hi-res photos on their site.

  14. #9464
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    Nice review Bobcat!

    Quote Originally Posted by eskido View Post
    Just want to say, I wanted to, but I just did not care for the Hackel Pro top sheet at all. Saw someone skiing em today and they look really, REALLY good! ON3P top sheets just always look so damn good in person!!
    There's been a few really sweet iterations on it posted online - most as stories on ON3P's instagram - that really took Hackel's "draw here" instruction to heart, like the first one below. The second is one of Hackel's takes, for a give away.
    Name:  980595_400w_1000h.jpeg
Views: 895
Size:  38.9 KB
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Skjermbilde 2020-12-15 kl. 10.21.22.jpg 
Views:	189 
Size:	480.1 KB 
ID:	352953

    ON3P's graphics game is arguably the strongest in the biz.
    Last edited by kid-kapow; 12-15-2020 at 03:49 AM.

  15. #9465
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    5

    50/50 touring ski

    Hey guys, already have the Jeffrey 108s for my everyday ski looking for a bigger powder ski for touring and days at Alta and Brighton. Do you think Billygoats with shifts will do the trick?

  16. #9466
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,900
    I’d go C&D for the Wasatch, most of the coloradbros say they prefer it in the low density pow. Not sure how much I’d enjoy lugging it into the bc though.

  17. #9467
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    21,213
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    Nice review Bobcat!



    There's been a few really sweet iterations on it posted online - most as stories on ON3P's instagram - that really took Hackel's "draw here" instruction to heart, like the first one below. The second is one of Hackel's takes, for a give away.
    Name:  980595_400w_1000h.jpeg
Views: 895
Size:  38.9 KB
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Skjermbilde 2020-12-15 kl. 10.21.22.jpg 
Views:	189 
Size:	480.1 KB 
ID:	352953

    ON3P's graphics game is arguably the strongest in the biz.
    Yeah, no
    The word is “hideous”

  18. #9468
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    337

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Some Jedi mind tricks isht going on with ski graphics - the more TGR hates on a graphic the more NS seems to love it.

  19. #9469
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    21,213
    That J108 above looks great; the old bg’s, wrens all look great; eagle; wolf; bear paw; all great. The colors w/ the subtle background pattern all good. The standard zigzag green bases are super sharp...they alway seem like they should be custom only.

    the cat & duck camo, Team [color]s & very specifically the hackel pro are terrible

    there also may be a rebellious so-ugly-they’re-cool vibe going on with that

    def could be a get-off-my-lawn TGR/NS divide...I’ll be the first to admit

  20. #9470
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,900
    Did you skip the last two pages of this thread?

  21. #9471
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    21,213

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Um...apparently ?

    (I don’t see much in the last couple pages on top sheet prefs...)

  22. #9472
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    59715
    Posts
    8,286
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    Yeah, no
    The word is “hideous”
    Fear no art!

  23. #9473
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,900
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    Um...apparently ?

    (I don’t see much in the last couple pages on top sheet prefs...)
    other than direct comments appreciating the Hackel design and a few pairs of camo skis purchased by maggots, myself included.

    you don't like them, cool. I just disagree with your assertion that those designs indicate some NS/TGR divide.

  24. #9474
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Portland by way of Bozeman
    Posts
    4,294
    Quote Originally Posted by brundo View Post
    Interesting. I've been searching for the replacement for my R2 108s for years, honestly really like the ski. I tried to replace it last year with a Praxis MVP but that didn't click. This year I'm trying the Jeffery 108 but what you're saying here about the woodsman is pretty interesting....we'll see if the Jeffery clicks.

    Also pretty funny that you talk about durability...I totally shredded the bases of my R2s yesterday, they look like a little kid scribbled on them.
    Keep in mind that the WD108 is close, but by its nature, will noticeably different. By that I mean the burly construction and core will make these a ski that needs energy and speed to liven up as compared to the R2 108. Those Salomons seemed like they could turn on a dime, anywhere, on nearly any terrain. The WD you will need to drive. And when you do, you're rewarded with a turny, fun, and lively ski, not unlike the R2 108.

    So maybe think of the Woodsman as having a similar ethos as the R2, just built to the standards you'd expect from ON3P. Oh, and they charge and hold up to speed. The R2 108s wilted pretty quickly.

    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    That J108 above looks great; the old bg’s, wrens all look great; eagle; wolf; bear paw; all great. The colors w/ the subtle background pattern all good. The standard zigzag green bases are super sharp...they alway seem like they should be custom only.

    the cat & duck camo, Team [color]s & very specifically the hackel pro are terrible

    there also may be a rebellious so-ugly-they’re-cool vibe going on with that

    def could be a get-off-my-lawn TGR/NS divide...I’ll be the first to admit
    Samesies. I loved the eagle on the Wren, the Wolf on the last year of the Vicik, and so on. Those were killer and clean.

    Does this mean I'm an old now? What's happening?

  25. #9475
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    21,213
    Quote Originally Posted by jackattack View Post
    other than direct comments appreciating the Hackel design and a few pairs of camo skis purchased by maggots, myself included.

    you don't like them, cool. I just disagree with your assertion that those designs indicate some NS/TGR divide.
    ah, ok...i do recognize that some folks do like them
    not trying to provoke or worsen any splits in the ski world continuum...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •