Check Out Our Shop
Page 139 of 626 FirstFirst ... 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 ... LastLast
Results 3,451 to 3,475 of 15626

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #3451
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    EC
    Posts
    1,061

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    (Post removed)
    Last edited by crank54; 03-13-2018 at 09:45 PM.

  2. #3452
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    169
    What year did you try? Pretty sure Jeff (pre- ‘14 I think) was elliptical and then they switched it to bi-radius.

    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    Darn, I didnt get along with the J114 as much as I wanted to. Found it too “hooky”.



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    "What could possibly go wrong?"

  3. #3453
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,799
    To bring this back to owen three p, could we get some more folk to weigh in on the Steeple 108? Thinking about pairing with the salomon shift from the group reorder. Stated weight is 2100g in the 189 which is already heavier than I'd like...but if it crushes I could justify it as a more 50/50 than touring setup

  4. #3454
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    To bring this back to owen three p, could we get some more folk to weigh in on the Steeple 108?
    Ha, I was kind of thinking the same thing as a heavier slackcountry setup. I haven't sent in my Shift pre-order yet because I'm still figuring out the brake size I want to get. Having said that, I'll probably just put them on my Wren 98's that I had kingpins on before and that way I can use that ski in the resort more often. The Wren 98 weight is only a bit more than the Steeple 108.

  5. #3455
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    yeah - sorry, didn't mean to derail the entire thread here. I do think the bmt/on3p ski comparisons still provide some stellar feedback for the on3p specific crowd though

    The day i used the BMT109s i swapped them after a few runs to get on my Wren108s instead. That was due to the super choppy, super tracked out, dense coastal fresh i was riding in. The BMTs were less than perfect in those conditions, though to be perfectly honest I think that had more to do with my lack of experience with/confidence in the BMTs than the skis not being up for it. Also, that pair of Wrens are 184 and come in at 8cm longer and what 500gr pr ski heavier, so - the wrens should knock the shorter and lighter BMTs out of the water every time in those kinda conditions.

    as for the steeple108/shift combo - personally, i think that sounds more like a slackcountry soft snow specific lighter setup than a touring setup. For that use i would have rather gotten a wren108 with tectons instead of the steeple108 with shifts for the same system weight, but a setup that is more versatile, can charge with the best of them and less soft snow specific. The wrens are pretty damned good in soft snow imo. I guess with you on the shift train that option is off the table though
    Last edited by kid-kapow; 03-05-2018 at 02:37 PM.

  6. #3456
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    431
    Trying to figure out a slackcountry setup for New England as well....Wrens or Kartels with Shifts?

  7. #3457
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,799
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Ha, I was kind of thinking the same thing as a heavier slackcountry setup. I haven't sent in my Shift pre-order yet because I'm still figuring out the brake size I want to get. Having said that, I'll probably just put them on my Wren 98's that I had kingpins on before and that way I can use that ski in the resort more often. The Wren 98 weight is only a bit more than the Steeple 108.
    So you're between 100 and 110? If the widest ski you're putting them on would be 108, I'd go 100 and bend...oh fuck nm. Bending BC brakes is unwise.

    Want me to see if Salomon offers brakes solo?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  8. #3458
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,897
    I'm definitely thinking more:
    BG w/ Shifts (have KPs on there now anyway)
    Steeples w/ Tecton or even Mtn Lab

    Sorry about your season down south but WOW, has it ever been a fun BG kind of year up here, so few days out on the Wrens.

  9. #3459
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    So you're between 100 and 110? If the widest ski you're putting them on would be 108, I'd go 100 and bend...oh fuck nm. Bending BC brakes is unwise.

    Want me to see if Salomon offers brakes solo?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    No, it's fine. I'm just going to put them on my Wren 98's.

  10. #3460
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    Quote Originally Posted by mtskibum16 View Post
    Interesting about the Kartel switching to bi-radius. I’d love to ski both style back to back for a comparison on feel. Side cut style is something most companies don’t seem to talk about. What is “standard” for most companies?
    Technically not 100% correct. It's now a Hybrid Sidecut - kept the elliptical front, but moved to a fixed radius in the rear. Holds a bit more consistent turn shape and helps the tail release a bit easier. That said, it is a change most won't notice, as most skiing the Kartels balanced don't have issues with either.

    Magnus line retains the elliptical sidecut. Two skinny Kartels go Hybrid, Kartel 116 stays as it is now with a Bi-Radius.

    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    Can someone straighten me out out on which models have bi radius, which elliptical, in the past and going forward? I know about RES.
    This year:
    RES - Billy Goat, Cease & Desist, Steeple 108/116
    Elliptical - Jessie 88/98, Magnus, Kartel 98/108, Charlie Murphy
    Bi-Radius - Wrenegade 88/98/108, Jessie 108, Kartel 116

    Obviously a bit tweaked next year, along with some of those skis being gone completely.

    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    AFAIK, the jibby pow skis (Caylor, Jeffrey 114/122(?), and now K116) have always had bi-radius, for as long as ON3P has been using that term. The 110 and narrower all-mountain jib ski has been elliptical for a while, since at least the Jeffrey 110 and now the Kartel 106/108. The bi-radius sidecut is more soft-snow oriented, but some people earlier in this thread have said they find it more predictable and less hooky in firm snow than the elliptical. According to Scott/ON3P, the elliptical hooks up more the harder it is put on edge, but feels pretty straight with bases flat.

    I've been very happy on the Jeffrey 110, which I thought had the biradius, but I just re-read Scott's email from 2014 and it says the Jeffrey has the elliptical. Interesting. I've been quite happy with it, but I ski a lot with bases flat so I guess it makes sense.
    OG 108 Jeffrey was Bi-Radius. After that, Jeffrey line was elliptical until it went to Jeffrey 114/122, which were both bi-radius. Besides the original Jeffrey (108), everything 110 and below has been elliptical in the Jeffrey and Kartel line.

    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    It makes sense -- ON3P used bi-radius on the pow skis and elliptical on the hard-snow biased skis.
    Bingo.

    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    To bring this back to owen three p, could we get some more folk to weigh in on the Steeple 108? Thinking about pairing with the salomon shift from the group reorder. Stated weight is 2100g in the 189 which is already heavier than I'd like...but if it crushes I could justify it as a more 50/50 than touring setup
    It's a good sidecountry ski that can handle inbounds well. That said, I do believe we are sold out of the 189cm for the year, and it won't be a stock model next year - made to order custom only. We do have 2 pairs of Steeple 116 189cm left I believe.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  11. #3461
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by teletele View Post
    Trying to figure out a slackcountry setup for New England as well....Wrens or Kartels with Shifts?
    I'm actually thinking about the same thing and trying to figure out how dumb of an idea that is. I do short tours and slack country for the most part so downhill capability is much more important to me.

    I'm looking at both the the Wren 108, and Kartel 108. I've skied both and loved both.

    Would it be overly stupid to throw a shift on here as a better alternative to frames? Anybody have frames binders on either of these?

    If this is really stupid please talk me out of it.

  12. #3462
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    367
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    To bring this back to owen three p, could we get some more folk to weigh in on the Steeple 108?
    I’ve already written a fair bit earlier in this thread if you go back and look. Experience since then continues to be very positive. Pow performance is better than the waist dimensions would suggest, firm performance is very good and predictable and funky 3D conditions are dealt with with very little drama. I think the ski makes a very good all around touring ski. It could be lighter, but then it’d probably give up some of its chops in challenging conditions. Really happy overall and haven’t found anything yet where I’ve been on the wrong ski with the steeples on my feet in the backcountry. Maybe not ideal here and there but pretty dame good all around.

  13. #3463
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    A little to the left
    Posts
    2,361
    Question for anyone who has been on both 184 and 189 BG's.

    How much do you give up in terms of maneuverability via sizing up?

    I've been on the 186? (now 184?) and love how quick it is in trees and tight spots. But I'm ~200 lbs and have had my share of feeling like I'm headed over the bars when I get forward. Especially when it's deep and chopped up. I'm not super charge-y in general.

    I've heard a lot of "you don't lose any top end on the smaller size". But do you give much up in terms of quickness in the 189?

    Also before you say it, I know I'm being stupid and it's not that much difference.

    edit: and yes, this does mean that there might be a minty pair of 186s up for grabs. Feel free to PM me if you're interested.

  14. #3464
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    apologies that my recollection of the Blister podcast was off wrt the sidecut being bi radius.
    Last edited by kid-kapow; 03-06-2018 at 12:46 AM.

  15. #3465
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,140
    Quote Originally Posted by Reformed View Post
    I’ve already written a fair bit earlier in this thread if you go back and look. Experience since then continues to be very positive. Pow performance is better than the waist dimensions would suggest, firm performance is very good and predictable and funky 3D conditions are dealt with with very little drama. I think the ski makes a very good all around touring ski. It could be lighter, but then it’d probably give up some of its chops in challenging conditions. Really happy overall and haven’t found anything yet where I’ve been on the wrong ski with the steeples on my feet in the backcountry. Maybe not ideal here and there but pretty dame good all around.
    I mostly agree with this. It has a fair amount of tip rocker (at least compared to the rest of my quiver) and is the best powder and breakable crust ski I own.

  16. #3466
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Masshole
    Posts
    2,391
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    Damnit! There was a sweet pair of barely used 189 w98s with bindings on ebay for $400 shipped and I missed them!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Oops 😎

    Sent from my XT1650 using TGR Forums mobile app
    Why don't you go practice fallin' down? I'll be there in a minute.

  17. #3467
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by prsboogie View Post
    Oops [emoji41]

    Sent from my XT1650 using TGR Forums mobile app
    Im glad a mag got them at least..


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  18. #3468
    Gman's Avatar
    Gman is offline Mack Master William Large
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Beserkley
    Posts
    2,123
    Quote Originally Posted by teletele View Post
    Trying to figure out a slackcountry setup for New England as well....Wrens or Kartels with Shifts?

    How tall/big are you? I've got 179 Wren 98 tour's with kingpins. You're welcome to take them for a spin sometime if you want. I'm a 26.5 boot.

  19. #3469
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Back in Seattle
    Posts
    1,526
    Are the 2nd run supergoats real? I want to know if I should be waiting for them and buying binders or holding out for a set of used normal bgs?

  20. #3470
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    Quote Originally Posted by carlh View Post
    Are the 2nd run supergoats real? I want to know if I should be waiting for them and buying binders or holding out for a set of used normal bgs?
    Should be done by the end of the week.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  21. #3471
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    On the mountain
    Posts
    775
    Thinking about selling my stiff, wood veneer Kartel 98’s and replacing them with Wren 108’s.

    I blew out my shoulder this season, and the wife has commanded me to keep skis on snow going forward (i’m not getting any younger). Managed to learn the hard way that 11” of powder on top of 60” of boilerplate ice isn’t enough to soften a bad landing after launching a cliff (Timberline, bottom of Molly’s, under the chair).

    I have custom BG’s for deeper days and got the K98’s for my DD’s to have something fun to pop around on. Now that jibbing is behind me/out of the question, I’m thinking a more direction ski like a Wren makes sense.

    Thoughts??

  22. #3472
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,926
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    Should be done by the end of the week.
    Various layups?

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  23. #3473
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    Quote Originally Posted by mattig View Post
    Various layups?
    Stiff on all of them. I personally think that is the ideal flex for the ski. I believe we are down to 7 pairs left available.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  24. #3474
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    Quote Originally Posted by MHSP1497 View Post
    Thinking about selling my stiff, wood veneer Kartel 98’s and replacing them with Wren 108’s.

    I blew out my shoulder this season, and the wife has commanded me to keep skis on snow going forward (i’m not getting any younger). Managed to learn the hard way that 11” of powder on top of 60” of boilerplate ice isn’t enough to soften a bad landing after launching a cliff (Timberline, bottom of Molly’s, under the chair).

    I have custom BG’s for deeper days and got the K98’s for my DD’s to have something fun to pop around on. Now that jibbing is behind me/out of the question, I’m thinking a more direction ski like a Wren makes sense.

    Thoughts??
    Really comes down to mount & balance. If you want to drive your skis more, Wren would be a good fit. If you want, schedule a demo from the factory and try a pair out. Thanks!
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  25. #3475
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    Quote Originally Posted by MHSP1497 View Post
    Thinking about selling my stiff, wood veneer Kartel 98’s
    ...
    the wife has commanded me to keep skis on snow
    Keep the skis, sell the wife?
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •