Check Out Our Shop
Page 13 of 16 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 389

Thread: ️snow tire recommendations

  1. #301
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Tejas
    Posts
    12,552
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    and I gotta say - there's nothing better in a snow storm than some nice, fresh snow tires.
    It's the BEST!!!

  2. #302
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    I can still smell Poutine.
    Posts
    26,651
    Quote Originally Posted by MontuckyFried View Post
    It's the BEST!!!
    HOoN!!!

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    11,762

    ?snow tire recommendations

    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Installed brand new Michelin X-Ice Snows on the CX-5 a couple days ago, and I gotta say - there's nothing better in a snow storm than some nice, fresh snow tires. Found the slush performance of these newer X-Ice model seems to be quite a bit better than the old ones, too.

    BRING ON WINTER!
    We’ve been on the X-ice, w/3 cars, for the last few winters, and need new for this season, so I just checked to compare with the newest Hakka’s. All the rating show that they’re essentially equal, yet the Hakka’s are ~$100 more/tire. I agree also that the this newest version of the X-ice is indeed better.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,268
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    We’ve been on the X-ice, w/3 cars, for the last few winters, and need new for this season, so I just checked to compare with the newest Hakka’s. All the rating show that they’re essentially equal, yet the Hakka’s are ~$100 more/tire. I agree also that the this newest version of the X-ice is indeed better.
    Drove Frisco to Copper Mountain this morning - roads were snowpacked/"icy" and man... what a pleasure. [emoji106]

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    7,924
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    We’ve been on the X-ice, w/3 cars, for the last few winters, and need new for this season, so I just checked to compare with the newest Hakka’s. All the rating show that they’re essentially equal, yet the Hakka’s are ~$100 more/tire. I agree also that the this newest version of the X-ice is indeed better.
    I've had both X Ice and Hakka's (studded), there's no comparison, Hakka's rule in every condition, except dry roads

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247
    X-ice snow is a totally different tire than X-ice.
    focus.

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,268
    Quote Originally Posted by k2skier112 View Post
    I've had both X Ice and Hakka's (studded), there's no comparison, Hakka's rule in every condition, except dry roads
    Are you *actually* comparing a studded tire to studless?

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sandy by the front
    Posts
    2,385
    Have loved the X-Ice, sounds like the new X-Ice Snow is even better. We bought a new Toyota Grand Highlander AWD Hybrid last spring and scored a set of OEM wheels on Marketplace for $100 each. Could not find the X-Ice in 255-55-20, nobody had that size. I was hoping that as we got closer to fall they would show up but no dice, everyone including Tire Rack did not have them. I always use Costco for tires but they talked to Michelin and they said it was unlikely that size would be available any time soon. Last month on a whim I was driving past a Discount Tire and stopped. They searched around and found three in Seattle and another in Northern California, YIPEE!. Had to buy new TPMS, by the time I was done it was $1600 but we got what we wanted.

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,136
    I think if I was buying studless, I'd be hard pressed not to pick X-Ice because it is nearly as good, or as good, as anything else while being MUCH longer lived. True snow tire with a treadwear guarantee? Amaze!
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  10. #310
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    7,924
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Are you *actually* comparing a studded tire to studless?
    Yes/no

    A lot of people say how awesome X-Ice are on the ice (I thought they were just OK), not even comparable to studs. X-Ice also lacked in deep snow, IMO

    This new X-Ice Snow has me intrigued. The lack of open side lugs on the X-Ice is what had me recommend Blizzaks to my son

    The Blizzaks performed as good as X-Ice on the ice for us

  11. #311
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    11,762

    ?snow tire recommendations

    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Are you *actually* comparing a studded tire to studless?
    I laughed when I saw it. When I had Hakka studs, there were plenty of times I was so happy to have studs. But when the studs wear, they get kind of rounded and drive kind of weird, and they’re just not at all that great on rain pavement…so everything‘s a compromise.
    If I only drove in the great white north where it never got warm. Oh, I’m going studs.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  12. #312
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,268
    Quote Originally Posted by k2skier112 View Post
    Yes/no

    A lot of people say how awesome X-Ice are on the ice (I thought they were just OK), not even comparable to studs. X-Ice also lacked in deep snow, IMO

    This new X-Ice Snow has me intrigued. The lack of open side lugs on the X-Ice is what had me recommend Blizzaks to my son

    The Blizzaks performed as good as X-Ice on the ice for us
    Yeah - on "real" ice I'm still going to drive cautiously even with the X-Ice. With studded I'd probably drive like a moran.

    Drove back to Denver last evening from Copper Mountain and had a variety of shitty conditions, including deep slush from Idaho Springs to town, and I have to say, these new Michelins are *very* good in slush, which wasn't so much the case with the previous ones we had.

  13. #313
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    At the North end of the Parkway
    Posts
    1,834
    Mostly due to my local shop's recommendation (and what they carry) I went with a Toyo GSI Observe 6 last winter, not studded I thought they we a great winter option at a fair price. They replace a set of Hakka studded and I felt we made a good decision. Those melted in our wildfire this summer so back to the shop I went, slightly different needs this winter with more ice and snow cover highway travel on a consistent basis (Icefields Parkway) I went GSI 3 Ice studded. So far so good, we shall see what a winter on those is like.

  14. #314
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,219
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    …so everything‘s a compromise.
    Snow tires and campers are both a metaphor for life; there are no solutions, only tradeoffs.

  15. #315
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Snow tires and campers are both a metaphor for life; there are no solutions, only tradeoffs.
    But why not just rage that the world doesn't bend to you?

  16. #316
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247
    Just a nod to aesthetics…because shut up that you don’t care. Michelin look great as car tires. Clean corners and sidewalls. Blizzaks look great as truck/suv tires with blocky corners and busy sidewalls. The inverse looks weird.

    /musings after installing new Blizzaks on my wife’s Atlas.
    focus.

  17. #317
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    11,762

    ?snow tire recommendations

    That’s funny. It’s kind of true. I’m pretty sure there’s a bunch of BMW folks who get those Perelli high-performance snow tires cause they look good.
    This is from a couple years ago. he might’ve done a newer review, but this is just fun background info while I watch football.

    https://youtu.be/YNjVsdbD998
    Last edited by plugboots; 11-09-2024 at 01:35 PM.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  18. #318
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,086
    Test showing Conti>Nokian>Michelin:

    https://www.tire-reviews.com/Article...s-for-2024.htm

    But what it really shows is that we’re missing out by not getting the newest Viking 8 in North America.

    Also nice that this test directly compares studded and non-studded tires.

  19. #319
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    Tire review guy
    Jonathan does lots of performance, track day, etc, tire reviews as well, and the BMW forums eat it up. He definitely has skills, and knows what he's talking about (and definitely has his biases), but my one gripe is that he's always drifting. And tires that drift well aren't necessarily the best for everything else.

  20. #320
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,136
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    Test showing Conti>Nokian>Michelin:

    https://www.tire-reviews.com/Article...s-for-2024.htm

    But what it really shows is that we’re missing out by not getting the newest Viking 8 in North America.

    Also nice that this test directly compares studded and non-studded tires.
    I really really enjoy his work and have watched most of his vids over the years.

    But I disagree with your conclusion. You weight how you want, but what the test shows is:

    Hakka 10 is the best WINTER tire in existence beating Conti while have 10% better resistance to aquaplaning than the studless Conti Viking 8. I find this accurate and have driven the Viking 8 back to back with the Hakka 10 both on Outbacks. That said, the Viking 8 is sweet.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  21. #321
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,086
    Quote Originally Posted by summit View Post
    I really really enjoy his work and have watched most of his vids over the years.

    But I disagree with your conclusion. You weight how you want, but what the test shows is:

    Hakka 10 is the best WINTER tire in existence beating Conti while have 10% better resistance to aquaplaning than the studless Conti Viking 8. I find this accurate and have driven the Viking 8 back to back with the Hakka 10 both on Outbacks. That said, the Viking 8 is sweet.

    That one wasn’t his, he was just providing the results of a Swedish test.

    I knew I wasn’t being clear enough. Was just referring to the non-studded tire order.

    Also, are you sure you were on Viking 8 not 7? As far as I can tell they’re not available in the US, and just became available in Canada (correction from my previous post that said not available in NA).

  22. #322
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Warrrrrrrshington
    Posts
    1,176
    Those VikingContact 8s looks a bit better than the 7s, hopefully they fixed the issues I had with the 7s I picked up last winter. I found the Viking7s have horrible traction on snow and ice when the tires aren't parallel the direction of travel. They are great when going straight then get super loose until they are turned 45 degrees. It makes sense looking at the tread design, there are no blocks, edges or sipes parallel to the sidewall. Eventually I learned to rely on countersteer and trust that if the tires slide laterally they will bite again at a certain angle. First snow/winter tire I've regretted buying (I've had Blizzak WS90s, X-Ices, Toyo Observes).

  23. #323
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,933
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Snow tires and campers are both a metaphor for life; there are no solutions, only tradeoffs.
    If you want to whine about the tradeoffs of Campers and snowtires just man up ... its nothing compared to Marriage

    re: the swedish test, none of you are swedish

    if you don't like the grip on studs when it isnt snowing, wait for it




    slow down
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  24. #324
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,086
    Quote Originally Posted by Stikki View Post
    Those VikingContact 8s looks a bit better than the 7s, hopefully they fixed the issues I had with the 7s I picked up last winter. I found the Viking7s have horrible traction on snow and ice when the tires aren't parallel the direction of travel. They are great when going straight then get super loose until they are turned 45 degrees. It makes sense looking at the tread design, there are no blocks, edges or sipes parallel to the sidewall. Eventually I learned to rely on countersteer and trust that if the tires slide laterally they will bite again at a certain angle. First snow/winter tire I've regretted buying (I've had Blizzak WS90s, X-Ices, Toyo Observes).
    We have VikingContact 7s on a CX-3 and Sienna right now, and I haven’t had any complaints about handling like that. (Previously had Hakka R3 on the CX-3 and X-Ice XI3 on the Sienna, and the Contis were an upgrade on both.)

  25. #325
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,136
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    That one wasn’t his, he was just providing the results of a Swedish test.

    I knew I wasn’t being clear enough. Was just referring to the non-studded tire order.

    Also, are you sure you were on Viking 8 not 7? As far as I can tell they’re not available in the US, and just became available in Canada (correction from my previous post that said not available in NA).
    Ah yes they are 7s, had to go out and check.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •