Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 249

Thread: ProtoPolyAss: What About Building Water Pipelines To CA and the SW?

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Maybe almonds seem somewhat more frivolous to people, like a snack, while alfalfa all people know is it's a regular farm crop and animals eat it so it seems more core/important.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,370
    Bomb Canada, divert the Fraser River, profit.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    706
    Pricing, pricing, pricing. The econ really is that simple. Yes, ag will take it...big time. So what? Are we really going to defend the model that's killing the West?

    In other news, these guys are doing neat stuff: http://waterfx.co/news/press-releases/

    Edit: ok, so there's lot's killing the West...

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,763
    It's funny how most "serious' responses are so heavily seasoned with snot.

    I've had people tell me this is not only a great idea (running a pipe from the Columbia River to Sandy Bagel) but convey that haughty incredulity that it hasn't been done or couldn't be seen as reasonable by even the most slow people.
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    2 hours from anything
    Posts
    11,076
    Quote Originally Posted by DJSapp View Post
    3. It's a drought. Droughts do pass in time. If it's climate change, the population will move.
    While agriculture may go elsewhere, I can't see the population centers moving. Even if most areas had to rely on 100% desalination, the cost is a drop in the bucket compared to the value of the real estate and infrastructure that is already in place.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,257
    Quote Originally Posted by BraddA View Post
    In other news, these guys are doing neat stuff: http://waterfx.co/news/press-releases/

    After six months in operation, the 6,500 square-foot, solar-powered test facility on North Russell Avenue has produced up to 8 gallons per minute of pure water from saline discharge drainage
    "Neat" is an apt description for a system that produces a whopping 8 gpm.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    EWA
    Posts
    23,123

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,102
    Quote Originally Posted by KQ View Post
    Totally achievable and not horrifically expensive, however if your local wastewater treatment plant eventually discharges into a surface water body, it is getting picked up and turned into drinking water somewhere else downstream. There are two main issues though--public perception is tough to break and only about 30-40% of water used in cities actually makes it back to the sewage plant. The quantity isn't there to dent this.

    Further, ag is the main water consumer in the state. The Farm lobby is why there's so much noise about this drought. The poor farmers of the valley are either forced to drill more wells (and further accelerating the subsidence issues in the valley) or letting their fields go fallow. The recent almond boom in the market (almond milk, almond flour, almond butter, etc.) has triggered the valley farmers to plant more almond fields which are exceptionally water intensive, as they water their fields by flooding them. Yes, flooding them. In 100 degree dry heat. Super effective use of water.

    Alfalfa is another issue as it is just a market exploit due to the trade imbalance with China. Loading up empty containers going to Bejing is cheaper than shipping to Portland at the moment.

    As for high speed rail, you have a better idea of how to move tens of thousands of people inbetween cities every day for less money? Please say hyperloop. I love it when morons talk about the hyperloop and they actually believe Musk's idea without actually having read his proposal, or having any concept of basic engineering principles and construction costs.
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    More water is used in almond production than is used by all the residents and businesses of San Francisco and Los Angeles combined.
    Mother Jones ran a recent article in which an expert figured that it takes >1 gallon of water to grow each CA almond. Freaky

    For those who haven't read it, pick up a copy of Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water, a remarkable and informative book, as good as non-fiction gets, will educate the reader about how the fuck we got where we are.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    OREYGUN!
    Posts
    14,563
    oops i should hit refresh- this was in response to Ice's first post on this page...

    well in that sense what about horses. There are 10 million horses in the US and the common figure thrown around that each horse takes up 7 acres of farmland in pasture and growing feed. Im sure the water footprint of a horse is not small.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,763
    Quote Originally Posted by steepconcrete View Post
    well in that sense what about horses. There are 10 million horses in the US and the common figure thrown around that each horse takes up 7 acres of farmland in pasture and growing feed. Im sure the water footprint of a horse is not small.
    Just remember son, that the west wasn't won on mountainbikes.
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    OREYGUN!
    Posts
    14,563
    i recall a figure-> something like 26 million draft animals at the peak in 1915 and that the move to mechanical tractors freed around 160 million acres of farmland and pasture that was used to feed them.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,935
    Quote Originally Posted by steepconcrete View Post
    well in that sense what about horses.
    Pipes would probably work better at transporting water than on horseback?
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,763
    John Wayne rode tractors?
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    EWA
    Posts
    23,123
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Steve View Post
    will educate the reader about how the fuck we got where we are.
    Hard to believe that people can't understand "how the fuck we got where we are" but as a species humans can be pretty stump dump.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    EWA
    Posts
    23,123
    Quote Originally Posted by steepconcrete View Post
    oops i should hit refresh- this was in response to Ice's first post on this page...

    well in that sense what about horses. There are 10 million horses in the US and the common figure thrown around that each horse takes up 7 acres of farmland in pasture and growing feed. Im sure the water footprint of a horse is not small.
    some dry reading for you:



    A Global Assessment of the Water
    Footprint of Farm Animal Products

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    OREYGUN!
    Posts
    14,563
    Quote Originally Posted by KQ View Post
    Hard to believe that people can't understand "how the fuck we got where we are" but as a species humans can be pretty stump dump.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulare_Lake

    edit- Thanks KQ-> Ive read that link. didnt think people would care that a horse water footprint is 1.3 acre feet of water a year....
    edit 2- that study includes rainfall -> many think that rainfall should not be included in footprint as dryland farming is not the issue...

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    EWA
    Posts
    23,123
    Quote Originally Posted by steepconcrete View Post
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulare_Lake

    edit- Thanks KQ-> Ive read that link. didnt think people would care that a horse water footprint is 1.3 acre feet of water a year....
    as I said - stump dumb



    A postcard shows what remained after a herd of buffalo was slaughtered; buffalo skulls piled on grassland, somewhere in Michigan.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    OREYGUN!
    Posts
    14,563
    FWIW according to all the signs along I-5 this is simply a "congress created dust bowl"

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    Quote Originally Posted by KQ View Post
    Hard to believe that people can't understand "how the fuck we got where we are" but as a species humans can be pretty stump dump.
    Well, so you know all about how dam building deals controlled the direction of Congress for decades, Floyd Dominy, Army COE v. BLM rivalry, William Mulhollond, O'Shaughnessy dam, etc., etc., but not everyone does.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    below the Broads Fork Twins
    Posts
    5,772
    Let the Arabs finance western research into desal. plants, refine the tech for a period and implement in CA.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,102
    Quote Originally Posted by neufox47 View Post
    While agriculture may go elsewhere, I can't see the population centers moving. Even if most areas had to rely on 100% desalination, the cost is a drop in the bucket compared to the value of the real estate and infrastructure that is already in place.
    San Diego has been under some form of housing moratorium since 2004 due to lack of water supply. The infrastructure is only the CA government's issue, not the population's. The public can walk away. Ag is here to stay as long as there is water to fuel them. They have endured drought before. 12.8% of the US total ag production in one central location isn't something you walk away from. The quality of soil and sunshine isn't something that you can take with you. The tech folks can pack their laptops and beat it.

    The new plant in SD is over one billion dollars to supply 50 million gallons a day: for reference the California aqueduct can deliver nearly that much EVERY HOUR. Water from desal costs approximately 10x the cost of conventional water supplies, that is, while there is enough capacity within our own power grid to supply the plants. To achieve 100% desal, we're talking about a complete western US power grid upgrade, complete with enough power plants to push the megawatts of energy required to run the plants. Who on the west coast is ready to approve a new Nuke plant?

    The main problem with desal is that it is too expensive to operate consistently, which turns operators off from building them in the first place. It is not likely to ever see a positive return on investment as once we have a good snow year, all of the desal plants get mothballed. It's the same logic behind the fracking boom of the moment. If OPEC and the Saudi's decided to up production, fracking gets mothballed until the next supply crunch. This is what happened to Santa Barbara and their desal.
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,102
    Quote Originally Posted by steepconcrete View Post
    FWIW according to all the signs along I-5 this is simply a "congress created dust bowl"
    Yup. They all believe that the water in the CA aqueduct should be theirs (i.e. fuck LA) and that the delta should be sucked through right up to the point the whole thing is full of brackish water.
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    OREYGUN!
    Posts
    14,563
    i think its crazy that most places in California have no ground water protection laws. Here on our farm in Lane County, Oregon we have two strong wells (and several creeks but thats aside the point) and we can't use a drop for farm use aside from watering livestock. From what I gather nothing is stopping farmers down there in many locals from drilling wells and pumping water at will.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Couloirfornia
    Posts
    8,874
    Quote Originally Posted by steepconcrete View Post
    i think its crazy that most places in California have no ground water protection laws.
    That just changed, as of last year. Though implementation/phase-in needs to speed up A LOT.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernest_Hemingway View Post
    I realize there is not much hope for a bullfighting forum. I understand that most of you would prefer to discuss the ingredients of jacket fabrics than the ingredients of a brave man. I know nothing of the former. But the latter is made of courage, and skill, and grace in the presence of the possibility of death. If someone could make a jacket of those three things it would no doubt be the most popular and prized item in all of your closets.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •