I've got someone saving a space for me out there. So neener.
I've got someone saving a space for me out there. So neener.
Obviously this is true, but I think grrrr is on the right track. No, we can't outright "ban" people from having kids, but we shouldn't be supporting people who choose to have children when they aren't capable of supporting them themselves.Originally Posted by tonghands
Unfortunately, if we don't 'support' them, the child pays the price. We spoon feed the parent to have more kids.Originally Posted by The AD
Let everyone move out of the Northeast for all I care - leaves more great skiing for those of us smart enough to stay![]()
This is true, but I guess my response is: "tough."Originally Posted by Trackhead
the govt shouldnt be in the business of incentivizing people to reproduce. people who have children and can't/won't support them should have them taken away, not given more money. there are plenty of people who can't have their own children and willing to adopt. they can financialy support these kids and provide good homes. sounds kind of harsh, but so is having a child raise themselves in squalor with their parents using govt support $'s to finance their drug/alcohol habit.
Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing. -Helen Keller
Really it comes down to setting fires. We need to set the occasional suburban neighborhood fire to thin our numbers. Keep the fire trucks at home. I also like the idea of 1 in 3 school lunches being poisoned in poorer neighborhoods.
I work in an ER. I see the worst of the US population on a daily basis (drunks, assaults, prisoners, meth heads, etc) My view point is therefore quite skewed.
My biggest beef is with Medicaid. I bust my ass, pay taxes, pay expensive health premiums. When I go to the doctor or ER, I pay out the nose for co-pay's, deductibles, non-covered expenses, etc. Guess what, Medicaid recipients DON'T PAY SHIT! They come to the ER for sore throats, cough's, minor complaints that are clearly abuse of the system and non-emergent. Often times they can afford a carton of cigarette's, but not a bottle of Tylenol or Pediprofen for there child with a fever. So we give them a prescription for an over the counter med so Medicaid will pay it. Nice.![]()
When Democrats speak how they want to expand health care coverage, it makes me want to puke. It will be expanded, but it still won't affect the middle class. More and more social programs IMHO makes us weak and apethetic.
Again, my opinion is skewed, take it with a grain of salt.
Anarchy is the only solution that will lead the human species to the freedom we so desire. Anything else is bureaucracy which leads to corruption, which leads to anger, which leads to hate, which leads to McDonalds.
No, Trackhead. Dem's have consistently supported health care for all Americans, not just those who can afford it or the poor (as you said). And obviously the reason you see what you do in the ER is the result of Republican obstruction (on behalf of the insurance industry) of primary health care for the poor, which forces all those problems, at far greater expense, into the ER. If we had national health care costs for everyone would go down, and the only losers might be some doctors/administrators who wouldn't see the six and seven figure paychecks they currently do. Oh, and maybe some insurance companies.
I used to not like this alias, but s/he is getting better all the time.Originally Posted by AlpineZone
[quote][//quote]
I can tell you that they don't come in thier own car either. They use the emergency taxi.Originally Posted by Trackhead
Ha!!! Healthcare in the US is so broken.Originally Posted by flykdog
If people don't tell you that, reality will tell you that -- in an infinitely more painful way.Originally Posted by tonghands
When you are dying of hunger because excessive grazing makes the Sahara desert grow and blow sand over your village's fields, reality is telling you "you don't get to have kids".
When your religion makes you reproduce until every square foot of your country is cultivated to feed you -- and then you have a few drought years or a flood and tens of thousands of you die -- reality is telling you "you don't get to have kids".
When there are too many of you in one place, and there isn't enough water or grazing land or farmland to go around, and they give you a machete or a gun and send you off to war and you get shot or cut and bleed to death on a battlefield, reality is telling you "you don't get to have kids".
When your government dams the Nile, and instead of yearly floods that replenish the soil, you have hundreds of square miles of flat water that breed mosquitoes and parasites, and the shrimp, fish, and sardine fisheries have disappeared, and people are dying of hunger and bilharziasis and malaria -- reality is telling you "you don't get to have kids".
We don't notice this in the United States, because we have a large country rich in natural resources, and have only been exploiting them for 150-250 years. However, we can easily look just like Bangladesh or Ethiopia if we want: just keep piling on the people until everyone is just as hungry and desperate as everywhere else.
Read Malthus? He'd love you. Marx would hate you.Originally Posted by grrrr
The way I see it, people are going to have kids regardless. Not because they want kids, but because sex is fun. Unfortunately, protected sex is a luxery people in third world countries can't afford. Instead of blaming poor people for doing what comes naturally to all of us, we need to strive to eliminate disparities in wealth. Capitalism REQUIRES a poor population to ensure cheap labor for the rich. As long as we are driven by a capitalist economy, global population will probably increase.
Because the US is very wealthy, we will probably see a stabalizing population in the future, assuming imigration slows or even stops. However, the population in the third world is going to continue to explode until we find a way to eliminate poverty, which I don't ever see happening.
I'm in a band. It's called "Just the Tip."
It seems like 50 cents or $1 for a condom is a whole lot cheaper than caring for a child.Originally Posted by PaSucks
I support John Kerry's stance on health care for kids. And it's true, all private insurance companies are crooks, with the bottom line being the dollar made.
On a smaller scale, perhaps if a co-pay was required at the time of visit to the ER, medicaid patients might think twice about coming into the ER for a sorethroat. It's the Big Mac, fries and a coke mentality. Why wait to see my private doctor when I can go to the ER free of charge and get instant gratification.
I personally don't know what the answer is reguarding the health care issue. I think it is a big quagmire without a simple solution, like a political thread.![]()
Actually it is. We are supposed to be the richest country in the world, yet, most Americans lack health insurance. We have a program, such as Medicaid and Medicare, that are losers...LOSERS! and broken and could use a fixing....but let's fix and privatize Social Security, which is so broken its in the black.Originally Posted by meatdrink9
I brought up the India example because it is just one of many I could have used. They export, their country starves. They also import and their country starves. Every country does the same and thats why we need to look at the ENTIRE environment, not just pockets because everything is based off of one another.
Some may think the micro-invertebrates in the Snake River have nothing to do with the economy of California, Washington, ORegon, IDaho...well they do.
Some may think that damming the Columbia has nothing to do with Utah...it does. Hundreds of salmon actually swim upstream to spawn near the Raft Rivers.
It is all connected, which a lot of people clearly cannot see.
I think a good example of this was the devastating volcanic eruption that occurred, i forget when, in SE Asia that put a cloud over the US, changed weather patterns, killed fish and wildlife and plants, sent people to the hospital...the list goes on.
Do we really want to look at the big picture? maybe. I do. And do we really want the world's population to double to 12 billion? That's a tough call but I can only imagine the poverty, diseases, pollution, and the like that will set in. Its a scary thought.
Population control should be taken upon ourselves to relieve our society of what may happen, voluntarily of course. If not, we might be heading down a dark and grim alley.
There's a world out there full of color, dreams, and imagination. What are you waiting for?
Tax the churches.
Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
>>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<
If we socialize medicine, you're grandmother will not be able to get an Endarterectomy until she has a stroke, versus prior to her stroke. Or your grandfather won't be able to have angioplasty done until after he has a heart attack.
That MRI for your knee you blew, forget it, might have to wait a few months.
Again, what is the answer? I'm not sure there is one.
Living in Canada, I see the problems associated with national healthcare. My g/f's dad lost his leg because he had to wait months for a routine vein by-pass. Ask him how well national healthcare works. Like Trackhead said about medicare, people in Canada show up to the emergency room to blow their nose. It clogs up the triage and hurts people with real issues. There was a report about people dying from heart attacks because they were forced to wait in overcrowded/understaffed ER. There is a shortage of qualified staff because the pay sucks. Lastly, you still pay roughly the same amount as private healthcare, just in the form of TAXES. National healthcare is not the answer. It doesn't work.
Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing. -Helen Keller
Don't nationalize healthcare, nationalize insurance.
Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
>>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<
The problem is the intelligent people that realize that overpopulation is the source of all the worlds ills take steps to have a small number of children, while the idiots who don't see the big picture have 10 kids. This creates a reverse Darwin effect, which will ultimately result in God blowing up this planet, and ending this failed experiment.
Stoy: Pinatubo? Not exactly an emergency here.
And Trackhead: Don't go blaming all the Democrats. The last effort to overhaul Medicare was by a Democrat (who is now the Jr. Senator of NY) and was subsequently laughed out of committee... by Republicans. The Welfare Reform Act is in place and has had a positive effect on reducing the rolls. It was championed and signed into law by: A Democrat.
Also, let's not confuse migration (to an extent) with Population Growth. People move around in the US to seek oppotunity, not to escape the crowds (for the most part.)
If it's broken, let the governement fix it. Their track record is impeccable.Originally Posted by Buster Highmen
That is simply not true. Go to Germany and see how long you have to wait for an MRI.Originally Posted by Trackhead
Preventive Medicine is one of the cornerstones of a good Socialized Medicine program. In those countries where it's utilized (Norway & Sweden, eg) the average health & lifespan are greater than here. Do not believe the Hype.
I honestly would like to model our Healthcare system after Cuba's, which given their limitations in infrastructure and materiel, is awe-inspiringly great.
Bookmarks