The issues with removal of hardware include, 1) additional surgery and associated risks and, 2) risk of still not feel better after having the hardware removed (e.g., any joint can have a baseline ache after a fracture, especially a severe one). That being said, there are certain findings on exam that would push me to remove the hardware. For example, in thin people the screws can be quite prominent and if the pain can be recreated by pushing on the screw heads. Another example is that someone describes that a healed ankle fracture doesn't hurt when in regular shoes but in hiking or ski boots the pushing on the plate hurts. You get the idea.
Intramedullary (IM) rods are their own category. Honestly, one of the biggest hesitancy to removing IM rods is that it can be quite challenging to do so and you can potentially cause damage in the process. Trying to get the insertion handle to lock into the nail often involves scraping away substantial bone that grew into the rod and, even once the handle is attached, you can sometimes mallet it quite hard and the nail doesn't always budge, etc. Furthermore, issues such as knee pain after insertion of a tibial nail may be inherent to its insertion, not the hardware. That being said, some people feel much better after removal, and because it's hard to predict, it can be hard to do a cost-benefit analysis.
As with most things in this forum, much of these considerations should be discussed directly with the surgeon, ideally the one that performed the original surgery.
Best of luck to you!
Originally Posted by jm2e:
To be a JONG is no curse in these unfortunate times. 'Tis better that than to be alone.
Bookmarks