With great expectations I headed over to the demo tent at Cystal today to take a spin on the next great ski . . . Volkl Mantras. I stepped up and asked for a set of 184's with hopes of comparing to the 191's. No deal. 170 & 177 only. The rep said he didn't have any 184's and said they are hard to come by.
I took a pass and tried some other too-short skis Head Monster 88 in something short of 180 as well. Liked them, great on groomers, not bad in light chop. Rep said they are mounted 5cm back on purpose. They need to be skied from a more upright position. Blah blah blah. Bottom line, they were fun, but I wouldn't want them on a powder day or going aggo in variable steep chute. Not enough ski. Of course, he didn't have access to anything longer either.
Later in the day I wandered back over to the Volkl tent and decided to at least try the 177cm version of the famed mantras. I liked my 180 exploders, but they were too short and while I never skied the 190, I kind of knew I wouldn't like it without a little more tip to help with initiation.
So I take the 177 out for a relatively steep fall line run of now corned up mank. They held a nice line, but they really hooked around way too much for my taste. I couldn't throw them out gently and butter turns in the corn. They just wanted to carve across the hill. On the groomers, they cut a much nicer trench than the explosives due to the shorter radius and bigger tip.
I guess the whole point of this thread is that the 177 Mantra is very very different from a 180 explosive. Better for carving, less versatile for the chop. For a reasonably aggressive skier, I would go up to 184 if you are debating between the two.
"Don't tease me about my hobbies, I don't tease you about being an asshole"
Bookmarks