Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 41

Thread: Fun Watching Olympic Slopestyle

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    76

    Fun Watching Olympic Slopestyle

    Our boys are bring home gold, silver and bronze from Sochi in ski slopestyle. Haven't seen runs but followed thread on new schoolers. Judging ? Show supposedly off the charts and should set stick and ball sport straight..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    base of the Bush
    Posts
    15,191
    Fuck You Asseater, thanks for the spoiler, eat a rancid bag of dicks and die!
    www.apriliaforum.com

    "If the road You followed brought you to this,of what use was the road"?

    "I have no idea what I am talking about but would be happy to share my biased opinions as fact on the matter. "
    Ottime

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    crown of the continent
    Posts
    13,947
    Edited title. C'mon people, we know threads will have details but don't fkn put them in the title...
    Something about the wrinkle in your forehead tells me there's a fit about to get thrown
    And I never hear a single word you say when you tell me not to have my fun
    It's the same old shit that I ain't gonna take off anyone.
    and I never had a shortage of people tryin' to warn me about the dangers I pose to myself.

    Patterson Hood of the DBT's

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Eagle River Alaska
    Posts
    10,962
    Judging was not very good... I think 3 of the judges weren't even slopestyle judges. They also valued stomping the shit out of the landing more than anything else...

    Henrick's Nose Butter Triple Cork 1660 was messed up huge... I though Goepper's run was cleaner and bigger than Joss's

    And whoever NBC hired to do the live extra commentary was just god awful. Unless skiing switch is now called reverse, and a D Spin is called a barrel roll.
    Its not that I suck at spelling, its that I just don't care

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Vancouver BC
    Posts
    3,296
    Watched most of qualifications and woke up again to watch finals. Judging was decent, the right guys made it to finals and Joss and Gus put down probably the best runs. I might have put Andreas in front of Goepper due to 12's both ways, but Goepper did do the genie grab and stomp a triple. Harlaut looked too sloppy on his landings and his stupid pants falling down didn't help haha.

    CBC commentating was bang on as usual, LOL @ stupid NBC.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Revelstoke
    Posts
    673
    I like CBC's team. They had the one guy who didn't know a thing, so he could ask the dumb questions like "what does scrubbing mean?" for the audience at home, while the other guy knew the difference between all the different grabs and what not. I haven't watched the finals yet, but the qualifying round was fun.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    558
    Quote Originally Posted by gramboh View Post
    Watched most of qualifications and woke up again to watch finals. Judging was decent, the right guys made it to finals and Joss and Gus put down probably the best runs. I might have put Andreas in front of Goepper due to 12's both ways, but Goepper did do the genie grab and stomp a triple. Harlaut looked too sloppy on his landings and his stupid pants falling down didn't help haha.

    CBC commentating was bang on as usual, LOL @ stupid NBC.
    The ONLY problem with Henrik's second run was a less-than-perfect last landing. He stomped everything else, and the nose-butter triple was huge. He probably should have been on the podium but the judges were really harsh on perfect landings all day. Here's a NS link to his final run.

    edit: for context, here's the other run replay's I've been able to find so far:

    Joss
    Kenworthy

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,495
    These guys a pulling shit that appears so utterly impossible to me, that I have no sense of whose run was more impossible. Looking forward to watching the finals in its entirety tonight and forming strong uninformed opinions.

    And holy shit, that Henrik guy should get bonus points for being the size of Martin Short and skiing in clothes big enough for Chris Farley.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Maple Syrup and Lumberjacks, eigh.
    Posts
    4,289
    I really enjoy watching this, but I can't believe it's an Olympic sport.
    ::.:..::::.::.:.::..::.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    703
    I stayed up all night watching it. It was sick. Henrik had the best run, but it wasn't clean. He still got robbed though. he should have been around 4th. Hatveit's run was scored way too high. His reaction to his score was hilarious. I still love Hatveit though.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    the RFV in the CO
    Posts
    264
    I wonder if anybody could explain why a thread about Shaun White (not a pussy) can get bumped incessantly with drivel and then this stuff gets dustbinned.

    This stuff is outrageous. ALL these guys are doing superhuman shit and making it look cake.
    Three things I find awesome/amusing...
    1) Nobody's got shit to say about Goepper's no-poles because he stomped the piss out of everything. Poles = Optional, end of discussion.
    2) Those groms from Newschoolers that you used to make fun of just swept the Olympics. Welcome to the future.
    3) Pants CAN be too big, it's true.

    Shoutout to Gus, way to show strong for Scentennial State.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    50 miles E of Paradise
    Posts
    16,938
    Quote Originally Posted by cuseo View Post
    I wonder if anybody could explain why a thread about Shaun White (not a pussy) can get bumped incessantly with drivel and then this stuff gets dustbinned.
    Maybe because there is already an Olympics thread where this kind of stuff gets discussed?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    the RFV in the CO
    Posts
    264
    noted...

    In my defense, I was bumping an existing thread and was speaking generally on the event on not the specifics. I think a historical podium sweep by Americans in Russia is worth a few seconds of reading and maybe a minute or two of appreciation, in the general forum. Much respect, TBS, but I stand by my comments and their placement.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    2,400
    Quote Originally Posted by cuseo View Post
    1) Nobody's got shit to say about Goepper's no-poles because he stomped the piss out of everything. Poles = Optional, end of discussion.
    Ummm, no. He looks like shit. He should just throw on a snowboard and get it over with. I think anyone on SKIS w/out poles should be judged down 2 or 3 points.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    1,922
    REally enjoyed as a spectator.

    Hinrick is almost coherent now. Drug testing is a positive for the sport.

    I thought the right people ended up in the right places. If the Fin ended up on the podium, it would have been wrong, but they fixed that in the end. The gold medalists dad painted a house I lived in when I first moved here. He was the sort of guy that is fun to have a beer with. I never connected the dots on that until last night.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,746
    Quote Originally Posted by 1080Rider View Post
    Ummm, no. He looks like shit. He should just throw on a snowboard and get it over with. I think anyone on SKIS w/out poles should be judged down 2 or 3 points.
    For stuff like this slopestyle competition, what's the point of poles? (serious question)
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Paper St. Soap Co.
    Posts
    3,665
    Quote Originally Posted by Adamantium View Post
    Thanks for the links to the final runs. I turned off the TV after getting mad at NBC for interrupting slopestyle with mens ice dancing.

    Anyone have a link to Goepper run?

    edit found all 3 runs on nbc site, but warning they have spoilers for todays events on the page:
    http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/thr...s?ctx=team-usa
    Last edited by 406; 02-14-2014 at 01:00 PM.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Paper St. Soap Co.
    Posts
    3,665
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    For stuff like this slopestyle competition, what's the point of poles? (serious question)
    Personally, I think it just looks better when they have poles and adds additional challenge.

    Perhaps I'm biased, but the ski slope style seemed much more impressive than snowboard slope style.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    2,400
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    For stuff like this slopestyle competition, what's the point of poles? (serious question)
    Have you seen the poleless guys at the top of the hill. They're wallowing around and it looks as dumb as the mad walrus the snowboarders do. The reason we use poles is to get around on the flat. It's as much a part of skiing as boots and bindings.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,746
    Quote Originally Posted by 1080Rider View Post
    Have you seen the poleless guys at the top of the hill. They're wallowing around and it looks as dumb as the mad walrus the snowboarders do. The reason we use poles is to get around on the flat. It's as much a part of skiing as boots and bindings.
    In the slopestyle comp, it doesn't seem like the skiers need the poles to help get up to speed at the start of their run. (Contrast to the downhill skiers, who skate and pole to get moving a little bit faster.)
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    76
    I think lack of poles hurt Nick in Style points. Their short poles are basically useless as we think of poles as part of skiing, but I do think that they use them for balance and style points. I think the judges did a good job.
    Ski slopestyle had no drama, just amazing feats by our Athletes. These guys deserve all the attention they are going to receive and they have squashed the tomato legend and started their own. Freeskiers !
    I try and explain to my ski friends that these kids go into jumps faster than I will ever go and they are going backwards. They then do these double, triple, flip twisty things flying 100 feet through the air and land like its just a bump in their run.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    2,400
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    In the slopestyle comp, it doesn't seem like the skiers need the poles to help get up to speed at the start of their run. (Contrast to the downhill skiers, who skate and pole to get moving a little bit faster.)
    Sure, but this is also a controlled run. Should they start riding 120 cm skis because then they can do a 2160? At some point, moving away from the sport in a traditional sense turns it into something else. They may not "need" poles in a slopestyle run but if you go skiing, it's ridiculous to think you'd leave the poles at home. IMO they should "look" like they're actually able to ski the whole hill, not just the "park."

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    9,000
    Quote Originally Posted by 1080Rider View Post
    Sure, but this is also a controlled run. Should they start riding 120 cm skis because then they can do a 2160? At some point, moving away from the sport in a traditional sense turns it into something else.
    You mean like riding freakishly wide skis almost like strapping two skinny snowboards to their feet? Yeah, that totally ruined skiing and changed it to something else in a negative way.

    I agree they look like dipshits without poles though. The only thing it is changing is my immediate knowledge that the person without poles is a douchebag without talking to them. Unless they are a little kid learning, but they're probably still douchebags too
    Brought to you by Carl's Jr.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    2,400
    Quote Originally Posted by systemoverblow'd View Post
    You mean like riding freakishly wide skis almost like strapping two skinny snowboards to their feet? Yeah, that totally ruined skiing and changed it to something else in a negative way.
    Not really like that at all. Wider skis enable skiers to float higher on deep snow- they serve a purpose. Going poleless does not serve a purpose in my mind. If his "purpose" is to make his tricks easier, then I say his scores should reflect the fact that his tricks are not as technical as the other skiers in the competition.

    And really- smaller skis serve a purpose but the douchebags that competed on those got laughed out of comps until they started riding real skis (see, mike nick).

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    9,000
    Quote Originally Posted by 1080Rider View Post
    Not really like that at all. Wider skis enable skiers to float higher on deep snow- they serve a purpose. Going poleless does not serve a purpose in my mind. If his "purpose" is to make his tricks easier, then I say his scores should reflect the fact that his tricks are not as technical as the other skiers in the competition.

    And really- smaller skis serve a purpose but the douchebags that competed on those got laughed out of comps until they started riding real skis (see, mike nick).
    So fat skis serve a purpose so they don't fit your argument. Shorter skis can serve a purpose but does fit your argument. You can't have it both ways. They either BOTH "moving away from the sport in a traditional sense turns it into something else" or neither. So either I'm right and you're wrong or it's a stupid argument. I'll let you decide which it is.

    And you can't say how he would have performed/scored with poles. It's just not possible.
    Brought to you by Carl's Jr.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •