Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 106

Thread: Preview/Review: 2014 Salomon Sth2 bindings

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,018
    I don't get it. Current STH Driver toes accommodate the height of a Mercury/Vulcan sole fine.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,375
    Quote Originally Posted by LC View Post
    I don't get it. Current STH Driver toes accommodate the height of a Mercury/Vulcan sole fine.
    Yes, but the rollers on the wings allow for smoother release for the different plastics that are used in tech boots.
    Click. Point. Chute.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,375


    Here is a video review of the Sth2
    Click. Point. Chute.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    438
    Does the STH2 heel have the same mount pattern as the Guardian heel?

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,375
    Quote Originally Posted by RiderX View Post
    Does the STH2 heel have the same mount pattern as the Guardian heel?
    The Guardian heel has 6 screws, the Sth2 only has 4.
    Click. Point. Chute.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,375
    I've been skiing the Sth2 for the past 2 months. Both the 13 and the 16 have performed as expected. The differences between the 13 and the 16 is the cast metal base plate under the toe and (cosmetic) metal stanchions on the heels. IMHO in skiing both of these on the same ski (2014 Nordica 107's) I could not feel a performance difference due to lateral rigidity. With many other bindings, I would err to the higher DIN version but the for these two, the $299 7-16 DIN Sth2 16 is not $70 better than the 5-13 DIN Sth2 13.
    I spent some time talking to Daron Rahlves, an Atomic athlete who was one of the beta testers for their version. Daron also has been skiing both versions and while he will be skiing mostly on the Atomic Sth2 16, he also spent some time on the Atomic Sth2 13 and did Banzai pre runs along with...SUGAR BOWL SILVER BELT GULLY video. Which also is a testate to it's stoutness.
    Click. Point. Chute.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    209
    So... How do we mount these new things? I won't get hold of a jig for a couple of months but I got my pair of Atomic STH2 16 last week (way meaner looking than the Salomon) and my Praxis Protests should arrive tomorrow so I want to do some mounting!

    I got access to the old STH jig and the Guardian jig. Will I find matching distances and guidance from those jigs or should I just try to copy the bases and figure out the boot sole distance through test mounts on a piece of wood?

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,375
    Quote Originally Posted by CarlE View Post
    So... How do we mount these new things? I won't get hold of a jig for a couple of months but I got my pair of Atomic STH2 16 last week (way meaner looking than the Salomon) and my Praxis Protests should arrive tomorrow so I want to do some mounting!

    I got access to the old STH jig and the Guardian jig. Will I find matching distances and guidance from those jigs or should I just try to copy the bases and figure out the boot sole distance through test mounts on a piece of wood?
    For the toes, you can use your old Sth jig but the heels do not match either jig, you might have to do them freehand which with the track design, shouldn't be too difficult.
    Click. Point. Chute.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Pleasuretown
    Posts
    1,095
    You can't use the old jig for the toes unless you know that the boot will sit the same, relative to the holes. Otherwise your boot center will be off a bit, which you might not care about too much. It sounds like the toes aren't exactly the same. Maybe I'm over-thinking it.
    Last edited by davieboot; 06-07-2013 at 07:33 PM.
    JigaRex Universal Ski Mounting Jig

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,462
    ^^^ i would still use the jig for the toes to ensure a centered mount (with regard to the centerline of the ski).


    however i'm not sure if the distance between the toe/heel of the STH vs, the STH2 is the same.
    In search of the elusive artic powder weasel ...

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    209
    I tried to investigate a bit today and compared the toes (STH to new STH2) and the boot placement. It was a bit tricky to get a good look (I just put them base to base) but it seems to align. Maybe the new STH2 might set the boot a few mm further back.
    But as pluffenmeister said, it is still very wise to use it as guidance to get it centered.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Pleasuretown
    Posts
    1,095
    I'm all for using a jig, and was just thinking aloud (typing?) that it probably wouldn't give you 'perfect' placement. Still better then any other options.
    JigaRex Universal Ski Mounting Jig

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Bern, CH
    Posts
    346
    Got the Atomic STH 2 16 in, dislike the orange colour, rubber dampening strip (wait for those stomp pads to stress crack...) and new mount pattern... Also the new brake and heel unit requires the heel to be screwed off its track to access the screws, which will make for slow swaps on inserted skis.
    The supplier said they are compatible with AT boots, which is true and false. Yes, AT boots will fit no problem, yes the rollers on the toe wings might help a bit with release, but no they are not up to the touring standard and a teflon plate to vibram interface is not as reliable as a din spec interface or a sliding afd.
    On the note of binding swaps, only looks really allow for a quick swap these days, probably not done on purpose but annoying all the same as inserts are more and more common.

    Despite the fact that there is no improvement to the previous model in obvious problem areas, il still be riding a pair this season, as its probably a great binding like it's predecessor.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Tutuko View Post
    The supplier said they are compatible with AT boots, which is true and false.
    The supplier should have been more specific - the party line is that they are only compatible and indemnified for WTR soles (alpine or AT), so Salomon and Atomic and whoever else bites. One nice thing is the STH2 16 is slightly lighter than the STH/FFG 16 - I get 1146 grams for the STH2 vs. 1178 for last year's FFG 16, and they appear equally if not more burly. The brakes also go on easily, where the metal tabs on the old ones didn't always fit into the slots like they were supposed to.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Bern, CH
    Posts
    346
    True, love the brakes, had too much trouble banging those old tabs into spec. I whine...but they are still my choice of alpine bindings, and I just ordered a pair.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,770
    Besides being heavier, the STH2 toe stack height (18mm) sure looks higher than prior STH models, but according to the specs they're only 0.5mm taller. Weird.
    Last edited by 1000-oaks; 06-22-2013 at 06:25 PM.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Bern, CH
    Posts
    346
    ^ a good mm, plus I'm not sure if someone mentioned it, but the front screws if the heel plate are floating on rails. I'm not averse to this, as it might give the tiniest bit of give/ flex through the long rigid heel plate and save stress on the mount.
    Atomic 16 colours are disgusting flouro orange.

    At 95% open they just fit my Cochise tech soles.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    That track looks like a demo toe plate with adjustment room.....or is it like a griffon heel with room? Standard up/down heel release?
    The real test on those wings for me is if they'll almost release but come back in if they don't need to go.



  19. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,375
    Quote Originally Posted by splat View Post
    That track looks like a demo toe plate with adjustment room.....or is it like a griffon heel with room? Standard up/down heel release?
    The real test on those wings for me is if they'll almost release but come back in if they don't need to go.


    Not a demo track, there is over 20mm of travel in the heel vs. 11mm for the Marker Royals. The heel is what you are familiar with from the Guardian but in skiing this new Sth2, it skis great. Elasticity in the toe is what you expect from a single pivot design.
    Click. Point. Chute.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    hey phil, can you confirm, the STH2 has +/- 20mm in the heel? whoa! that's awesome.
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SLUT
    Posts
    2,040
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson View Post
    hey phil, can you confirm, the STH2 has +/- 20mm in the heel? whoa! that's awesome.
    Hey Marshal, I have a set of STH2 13s sittin in the garage if you want to fondle them.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Phil, Marshal, what's the general thinking on heel-only binding travel as it relates to bcl's, weight distribution, sidecut and overall efficacy?
    There must be a general consensus that the manufacturers have come to on all that to justify an increasing presence in half a demo bindings on the market.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,375
    Would and adjustable toe and heel be better as a demo binding? Sure, but it tends to be at the cost of performance as the interface between the boot and ski gets compromised let alone the additional weight. I do think the Marker Royal demo bindings are the closest in performance and feel to their retail counter parts.

    Marshall, as far as the travel, Salomon is billing 28mm!
    Click. Point. Chute.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Back in SEA
    Posts
    9,656
    Quote Originally Posted by splat View Post
    ...There must be a general consensus that the manufacturers have come to on all that to justify an increasing presence in half a demo bindings on the market.
    yeah, it is cheaper for them to make a binding that only adjusts in one place, BCL's be damned...

    at least I think that's what you are driving at?!?
    ... jfost is really ignorant, he often just needs simple facts laid out for him...

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Bern, CH
    Posts
    346
    Just measured 28mm usable adjustment on the STH 2. Really happy with it so far after 4-5 days skiing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •