Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Backcountry 101: Who’s Responsible?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442

    Backcountry 101: Who’s Responsible?

    http://skiingbusiness.com/18417/feat...s-responsible/

    Andreas's comments are very interesting

    "I think we can try to mediate humbleness for the mountains and encourage people to educate themselves in general mountain sense. I think most of this can come from the media (films, magazines, etc.) that the industry is sponsoring. And I think we should stop supporting media that is showing disrespect towards the mountains. As an example it’s not really cool to out-ski an avalanche and then scream how cool that was. Instead maybe we should see it (and communicate it) as a mistake made and celebrate that we survived our own stupidity. "

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    7,167
    very few lives are lost to avalanches each year in the grand scheme. avy edu and gear offered is on the up, so are users. we as humans choose what we wanna watch, listen and follow. if folks wanna ski stupid, let em ski stupid, and live, or die. 1st world problem.

    rog

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    5,732
    Honest question:

    Which recreational 'hobbies' in North America kill 30-50 of it's participants per 4 month season in recent years? Ocean rock fishing, para/hang gliding, mtb, scuba, rock climbing, rodeo, surfing, parachuting, white water?

    I think I asked this question in the past but can not find the answer again.
    Life is not lift served.

  4. #4
    Hugh Conway Guest
    90-150 people a year? Scuba numbers appear to be about that http://www.rf30.org/final2012/wp-con...umbers_PDF.pdf The key is participation rate for BC skiing ; the data for BC skiing I've seen is almost universally shit. Even with actual numbers it's highly unlikely the avalanche risk is uniformly distributed.

    Which ties into 1) what do you teach people who have diverging desires? A brobrah who's goal is to huck cliffs in the Slackcountry has different needs for education than someone who's interested in the Spearhead and Garibaldi Neve. The brobrah should probably have some mention of hazards involving trauma in addition to avys. I guess the industry could help some, but there's no way the industry alone is going to convince a kid raised on Tony Hawk Pro Skater that meadow skipping might be fun. Besides a succesful meadow skipper needs simplicity, durability and wants low cost, orthogonal to the goal of the selling shit industry.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    5,732
    I'm not sure I can get away with this annualisation, however 90-150 scuba deaths per year is roughly 30-50 per 4 months. I'm assuming here that scuba is a 12 month per year sport whilst backcountry skiing is not a year round activity. If it were, we may perhaps see the same mount of avalanche deaths as we do scuba deaths.

    Agree participation numbers are key. And even then, demographically skewed.
    Life is not lift served.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    My WAG is that mortality rates are exaggerated but I have no basis for that.

    An intro for an article that I canned because it was such a WAG pulled together numbers that i could get

    "Interest in backcountry skiing is about as high as its ever been. How much interest? Accounts vary and anecdotes abound:

    From Backcountry Magazine in Fall of 2012, increases in visits to Rogers Pass (a world famous backcountry destination in Glacier National Park, BC) rose 124% from 2009 - 12

    From Snowsports Industry America circa Sept 2010 (SIA)- AT ski sales were up 57% from 2009 - 10

    From Skiing Business November 2012 - The biggest growth in the category, AT boots, shot up from about 6,000 units during the 2007–08 season to 10,000 units for the next two before nearly doubling again last year to 23,000 units. Bindings went from about 6,000 units during the 2009–10 season to 11,700 units the next.

    The true growth is hard to figure out (for example SIA numbers are notorious wild-ass-guesses). Also keep in in mind that backcountry equipment sales (and by extension the numbers of people who venture into the backcountry) are a fraction of the total skiing population of North America; from an ESPN article published Nov 28, 2012 - In a North American snowsports market that grossed just over $3.3 billion in 2011-12, sales of backcountry-specific equipment and accessories such as beacons, AT boots and bindings -- outerwear and skis that can pull double duty in both the resort and backcountry notwithstanding -- came to around $32.5 million, or 1 percent or total sales."



    Source: Skiing Business, October 2011; numbers of people getting into backcountry areas via resort access steadily increasing

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    2 hours from anything
    Posts
    11,076
    Quote Originally Posted by neck beard View Post
    I'm not sure I can get away with this annualisation, however 90-150 scuba deaths per year is roughly 30-50 per 4 months. I'm assuming here that scuba is a 12 month per year sport whilst backcountry skiing is not a year round activity. If it were, we may perhaps see the same mount of avalanche deaths as we do scuba deaths.

    Agree participation numbers are key. And even then, demographically skewed.
    I wouldn't call Scuba a 12 month sport except for the caribbean and certain other areas. Even where it can be done 12 months a year there are ups and downs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,574
    Every backcountry region is different in terms of what type of mistakes people are making. Here is CO, education is in your face and widely available for a very affordable (often free) price. I see this lack of humility and respect for the mountains to be a huge part of bad decision making. Using the shit show that Berthoud Pass can be as an example, lack of respect for the mountains can be used to explain both the uneducated getting in over there heads and the educated, geared up "advanced" backcountry skier going for it.

    One of the biggest challenges to overcome is that a powder covered slope does not "look" scary.

  9. #9
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Foggy_Goggles View Post
    One of the biggest challenges to overcome is that a powder covered slope does not "look" scary.
    Isn't that awareness and conditioning? Humans didn't always think mountains were fluffy wonderful playgrounds; people used to treat them with fear. A 20th century example is how Balinese weren't "watermen" they were mostly fearful of the ocean (except for some fishermen, who even then were somewhat fearful) until westerners came and started surfing/swimming/everything and now there's a number of balinese surfers/watermen some of whom really rip. The ski industry isn't powerful enough to get people to wake the fuck up and pay attention to their surroundings


    If it matters ~750 AT/Tele boots sold in N. America on eBay and ~350 AT bindings in the past 3 months so that ratio appears about right Lee. ~50k AT boots in 4 seasons is tiny, but goes along way to explaining much "industry" behavior.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Where the chairlifts do double corks
    Posts
    527
    to any one that thinks avalanches only happen 4 months out of the year.. remind me not to go anywhere near you. avalanches happen every month out of the year.
    long live the jahrator

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    7,167
    Quote Originally Posted by totaliboard View Post
    to any one that thinks avalanches only happen 4 months out of the year.. remind me not to go anywhere near you. avalanches happen every month out of the year.
    stay away from me then. i'm a firm believer that if you fear avalanches, they will kill you. no fear, you live

    rog

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    5,732
    Quote Originally Posted by totaliboard View Post
    to any one that thinks avalanches only happen 4 months out of the year.. remind me not to go anywhere near you. avalanches happen every month out of the year.
    Of course. But the throngs of recreational backcountry consumers are generally only exposed to that hazard for 4 months a year. Hazard is year round, exposure - therefore risk, is seasonal.

    Adding to the data from Lee above, very up to date BC Coroners data: http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/coroners/p...che-deaths.pdf

    Coincidentally, the Coroner in BC defines an Avalanche Season:
    Cases are grouped by avalanche season, with each season defined as beginning in November and ending in April of the following year
    Life is not lift served.

  13. #13
    Hugh Conway Guest
    that'd be 6 months and at least in California scuba season is pretty much year round I think. Or people die year round.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    5,732
    I just picked 4 months based on the very obvious ebb and flow of tourists I see in my area. Dec-Jan-Feb-March is also the period that avalanche centers seem to publish for.
    Life is not lift served.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Where the chairlifts do double corks
    Posts
    527
    well, i got broke off in a wet slide last june. 12 or so people died in august on manaslu, then the Canadian in October..
    long live the jahrator

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    funland
    Posts
    5,255
    we get that you're special, totaliboard. but your stupidity in june doesn't equate with the hazards that the vast majority of backcountry skiers deal with during the winter season.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Where the chairlifts do double corks
    Posts
    527
    yo dick weed. the point is to make responsible decisions whether its june or january. in case you havent noticed, it can get warm in in the winter and snow in the summer
    long live the jahrator

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by neufox47 View Post
    I wouldn't call Scuba a 12 month sport except for the caribbean and certain other areas. Even where it can be done 12 months a year there are ups and downs.
    I know a number of people that SCUBA all year round. This is in NZ where the water temperatures get well below 10 deg celcius.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •