So, a question for all you. How do I tell what "fit" my Lange comp 120 is? I have had them for three seasons now, well over 300 days, and they are tired(shells cracked, liners shot). I want to replace it with the same boot, same fit, same modifications, but I don't know if it is low fit or medium fit. Anyone know how to tell the difference? No way do I want any tighter fit, already lose toenails every year.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: Lange boot fit
-
02-26-2005, 11:46 PM #1
all things gaper
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- The Higher the better
- Posts
- 442
Lange boot fit
"Is it necessary to disdain the affluent Escalade driver in the ski area parking lot just because he never threw caution to the wind and gave up work, meat, and let his hair grow in the surreal international sojourn of powder skiing and self-actualiztion?"
WELL OF COURSE, thats why I am me and you aren't
-
02-26-2005, 11:51 PM #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Down the valley a bit further on the good side of the 49th
- Posts
- 4,342
Pretty sure that was the first year for the 120 and it only came in one volume, low. It may not have been marked since it only had the one fit.
It's not so much the model year, it's the high mileage or meterage to keep the youth of Canada happy
-
02-27-2005, 07:08 AM #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Vermont
- Posts
- 316
Not so sure that there wasn't a medium fit the first year. I have a pair of pre-production 120's and they are a medium fit. I can't find any markings on the boot or liner that say that it is a medium fit. Maybe a good shop can tell you which one you've got.
-
02-27-2005, 10:45 AM #4
singletrack state of mind
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- between here and there
- Posts
- 6,230
i remember reading last year was the first year of the medium fit, so i do believe you have the low volume, maybe a step up to the medium fit might benefit your toenail issue.
More fucked up than a cricket in a hubcap
-
02-27-2005, 09:26 PM #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Warrrrrrrshington
- Posts
- 1,176
I thought it was:
1st yr. 120- low and med 120 FR- low
2nd yr. 120- low and med 120 FR- med
Wasn't the part of hype of the first 120 the fit-ability for "non-lange" foot types, higher volume feet could finally fit a L10 type boot without major mods?
-
02-27-2005, 10:11 PM #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Down the valley a bit further on the good side of the 49th
- Posts
- 4,342
Recalling further I don't think the 120 was brought in to Canada the first year of the comp series but they did exist. Second year I think it was just the low fit here but that may have no bearing on what was available elsewhere. I think you'll have to take them in and compare them by shell fitting with a low or medium.
Last edited by L7; 02-27-2005 at 10:14 PM.
It's not so much the model year, it's the high mileage or meterage to keep the youth of Canada happy
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks