"The idea wasnt for me, that I would be the only one that would ever do this. My idea was that everybody should be doing this. At the time nobody was, but this was something thats too much fun to pass up." -Briggs
More stoke, less shit.
but if yer mid slope and the feel changes, yer not gonna change up yer pressure or technique?
oh, and that go based on "skiing lightly" is made with ones own level of comfort/confidence. all of us posting here are still here for a reason. a combination of good decision making and of course, luck.
rog
Of course I am. I didn't say skiing lightly doesn't have a place (it does). I try and ski lightly all the time. That said I'm not going to drop in on something that I think will pop if I ski it hard and will stay put if I ski lightly. I know that I'm (or anybody?) not good enought to make that call with any sort of success.
"The idea wasnt for me, that I would be the only one that would ever do this. My idea was that everybody should be doing this. At the time nobody was, but this was something thats too much fun to pass up." -Briggs
More stoke, less shit.
You could stop and proceed to your nearest island of safety. Nobody says you have to link turns the entire way down if you all of a sudden see shooting cracks and whumpfing that you have to keep skiing.
"The idea wasnt for me, that I would be the only one that would ever do this. My idea was that everybody should be doing this. At the time nobody was, but this was something thats too much fun to pass up." -Briggs
More stoke, less shit.
yes, but you are successful until you are not. maybe my risk tolerance is higher and i most certainly have trusted MANY "bridged" slopes with light touch turns. slopes skied safely and without incident are success stories. till they are not. we learn to avoid the not in our own ways on a case by case basis. courses/reading only teach so much.
rog
No offense to the OP. but the entire rest of this thread is worthy of the ignore function.
off your knees Louie
True. Reading and courses only teach so much but what is learned from then cannot be forgotten simply because someone has gained experience . I think you might want to revisit the books though. Specifically the sections on rational and irrational descision making processes and how they should both be used in backcountry travel.
Eifher way your risk tolerance is way way higher than mine. To each his own.
"The idea wasnt for me, that I would be the only one that would ever do this. My idea was that everybody should be doing this. At the time nobody was, but this was something thats too much fun to pass up." -Briggs
More stoke, less shit.
hey fuck you, i just spent the evening cooking, cleaning, taking care of the animals, and making sure things are damn near perfect for when my better half comes home from a tough hospital shift!
can't i play on here too?! multitasking. ahhhhh, tgrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!
shit she's home, gotta go bye!
rog
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
black and white, for many here, seems to be the only "accepted" form of conversation when discussing human factors and the decision to go or not go.
there's a whole lot of grey area including personal practices/management in between that i think is also very important to discuss here that isn't taught or learned from books.
rog
Fair enough. Truthfully that's a much better way to go about skiing backcountry than this other bullshit we are talking about. Only ski slopes that you are confident 12 obese drunk texans could bellyflop down. That should be the take away from this stupid discussion.
I was just trying say that I've heard the term used alot, and I think it almost conveys more or a feeling about the snowpack rather than cut or dry rules. Or rather just reminding your partner to stay light and be aware. Means the same thing to me.
But there is still a big difference between you and your partner skiing down the fattest part of an open bowl and letting 6 fullfaces charge around in the rocks and hot tub 40 footers.
Drive slow, homie.
No argument from me. I make my living opening terrain so that 6 fullfaces or 12 obese drunk texans could ski any part of it all at once. Such a pretty picture.
When it comes to skiing uncontrolled terrain there are no cut N dry rules.
Aside from that I find Rog to be an annoying windbag, but again that's just me.![]()
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
this is the TGR we've all come to know and luv ...
a seemingly normal discussion turns into a bunch-a-bitchin and name calling.
but seriously, many times I've told people to "tread lightly" but not for the entire line.
We, the RATBAGGERS, formally axcept our duty is to trigger avalaches on all skiers ...
hey, there's lots of different ways we manage our own risk in the bc. for some it's a simple conservative go or no go, which is great. for others, myself included, we try to see how we can make a go of it by minimizing the risk as much a possible, but still ski the good snow that elevated danger ratings oftentimes bring.
but many folks here, especially some of the "pros"(roll eyes here) want to throw their weight around like they have it all figured out and ridicule how some of us roll. they don't really know jack shit. ya maybe pro bunion has his living making control routes figured out, but the very inexact science of snow will always keep us guessing.
rog
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
"Those 1%ers are not an avaricious "them" but in reality the most entrepreneurial of "us". If we had more of them and fewer grandstanding politicians, we would all be better off."
- Bradley Schiller, Prof. of Economics, Univ. Nevada - Reno.
Bookmarks