
Originally Posted by
geoffda
I believe the sidecut simulation is based on deformation of the wheels, but however it works, it provides a good correlation between tipping angles and turn radius. Harb Carvers don't respond well to pivots (subtle or otherwise).
The HC wheels are standard in-line skate wheels and I have not seen any deformations in them or the way they are mounted. There are board solutions with multiple rows of wheels that simulate a side cut e.g. flowboard or the one disclosed in the US patent 5855385 but it's a completely different ball game.
Check this video of in-line skate slalom run and tell me what you can do on HC which you can't on in-line skates
The main advantage of HC is that they simulate edges but if you have old style skis without a side cut rolling your knees on the edge is not going to induce a meaningful turn. You can turn on HC because they are short and amenable to subtle pivoting movements which you can see in this video of one-footed exercise
.
The slightly more advanced turning technique is demonstrated in this video
It works by advancing one of your feet and positioning them in a divergent way i.e. simulating side cut between two of your in-line devices. To a degree this is also done when you carve but the main reason is to effectively extend the turning radius of your outside ski i.e. it works a bit like the diff in a car which makes adjustment for a different turning radius of inside and outside wheels. However, even in this case if you have aligned wheels there's no other way to make them move along a curve without slight pivoting of your feet.
Try extending the length of HC to the same length as my device and turn on them to see the main difference. This is not to say that HC is not a great training device but I am trying to achieve much more i.e. make it something that can be made a training device but also fun to ride on off road. I have been contacted by a guy who wants to run his ski lift in summer so people can have a more realistic skiing like experience. The reality though is that whatever we do we can only achieve a better or worse approximation of skiing but there's no substitute for the real thing. Obviously you can ski on all sorts of artificial surface but this is a high maintenance proposition.
Last edited by nosnowski; 07-03-2012 at 10:08 PM.
If it has wheels, people will race it and sometimes even wheels aren't a requirement
Bookmarks