A couple points:
First of all, the only thing a foolproof system does is expose better fools.
Second, when the shit hits the fan in the bc is the time for learned reaction to kick in. Not the time to be learning.
Third, a bc group needs to be carefully constructed. I personally like to keep it to about 3 people, depending on length of trip and exposure. A goup of 3 lets two help one if one is in trouble and if help is needed, one can stay and one can go. (of course this all goes to shit if two get hurt). People's skill can be difficult to judge and groups that don't know each other should stick to mellower tours until they know and trust each other. A bc group is a team, and just like any other team, experience together is probably just as important as individual experience. When the shit hits the fan, its good to know how people are going to react. You never know if someone who has been skiing bc forever is only alive due to luck.
And last, Newbies dont count. In other words, i like to see three good experienced people for every newb. It is hard to think of a situation where a newb is automatically more of an asset than a liability. They are there to learn.
Some of my scariest days have been due to not carefully selecting my companions. The only avalanche i have ever been in occurred just after the guy i was skiing with for the first time informed me he had left his beacon at home. (This was at the top of the run) He explained he didn't need it since it was a spring corn trip. Of course our late start and my lack of familiarity with the trip led to us summiting long after corn had turned to slurpie, and I got to ride down the face of Mt Blackmore in a wet slide.
<phil esterhaus> Let's be careful out there.</phil>
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin
Bookmarks