I haven't been tested lately because the numbers are mostly trash anyway: "LDL" is an imputed number, which is to say it's completely made up based on your TG and TC and has nothing to do with anything. Add to that the fact that some types of LDL are associated with CVD and some are inversely associated, and I don't really care what my numbers are.
http://www.jpands.org/vol10no3/colpo.pdf
My attitude is "Are your numbers bad? Eat healthy. Are your numbers good? Eat healthy."
My mother, however, did just get tested. She's not pure paleo by any measure, but she is gluten-free and has been eating a diet very high in saturated fat and low in carbs, with lots of eggs, red meat, butter, etc. I don't remember the exact numbers, but they're something like:
TG: 51
HDL: 115
"LDL": 90?
In other words, she's off the bottom of every chart as far as associations with heart disease are concerned.
And these numbers are an improvement over her numbers previous to changing her diet.
She and my father are also building rock walls in their yard at an age most people are driving mobility scooters.
Re: Trackhead's chart, also recall that once you reach appx. age 65, greater total cholesterol is associated with longer life... something few doctors will tell you.
Bookmarks