
Originally Posted by
KQ
yes and I spoke to that in my post - the thing with Wal-Mart is that they undercut their competition - Starbucks does not. I could go to Monorail Espresso and get a cheaper cup o'joe.
In any case - I ask again: What is this line we draw re: positive vs. negative when a business is expanding? That is to say, when do we stop admiring them for doing well and who gets to decide? Do we put a cap on expansion just like we do on building? What about free enterprise?
Disclaimer: Blatant stereotype use
Starbucks can put a coffee shop wherever they want for all I care. I dislike the culture surrounding Starbucks. The semi-elitist, SUV driving, soccermom crowd. Or in the case of the Starbucks on the Ave, the frat/sororiety, semi-elitist, look at my fancy clothes bullshit that seems to be present there.
We can stop admiring them when they lose sight of their roots. I personally think Starbucks has.
I guess it boils down to the fact that I don't like the vibe in Starbucks, never have, never will. And I like to support small, local business because I feel that the level of service and quality of goods I recieve is better.
"These are crazy times Mr Hatter, crazy times. Crazy like Buddha! Muwahaha!"
Bookmarks