Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 76

Thread: Bro Models = RAD

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,288

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by spanky
    Any chance of turning a few of those blems into demos and bringing them to the JH summit? I'd love to give them a try.
    Along those same lines, will any demo pairs be making it to the Utah Mini? After this season I'll be in the market for new boards, and I'd love to try these things out. Just wondering, and great job Splat, I know that I couldn't put up with all the crap you have for these skis.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    318 Powder Lane
    Posts
    3,647
    Enough when are the blahh blah blah.... will they be yadda yadda

    make with the reviews already!!!!
    fighting gravity on a daily basis

    WhiteRoom Skis
    Handcrafted in Northern Vermont
    www.whiteroomcustomskis.com

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Cowtown
    Posts
    354
    Made my first Bro turns last Saturday, on mntlion's supersoft prototypes. Considering how soft they are, I was impressed with the stability and the lack of deflection at speed. Definitely looking forward to my soft Bro's - Idris told me that the regular softs are a good bit stiffer than the supersoft proto's.

    Splat - don't give yourserlf an ulcer! We know you've been busting your ass to get the Bro's out ASAP and we appreciate it.

    Unrelated Bro story: I was leafing through the latest issue of Powder when I came across the PM Gear ad. I said to my girlfriend (who thinks her Tua Crossrides are the best ski ever ), "Hey, here's the skis I ordered!"

    She comes over and takes a look. "Is that what colour they are?"

    Me: "Uh ... yeah."

    Her: "Don't you think they look kind of feminine?"



    And before anybody brings this up: No, there will be no naked pictures of her posted on the board. I already asked.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    634
    I skied the pro-bro (super stiffy) on icy death this past Sat. I was impressed with how light they were for such a bomber ski. Didn't feel like there was anything on my feet. They held an edge great. They reminded me of the explosiv but lighter and quicker edge to edge.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    It's impressions like these that make my day. I know someone will come along who doesn't like them or prefers another ski over the Bro, and that's to be expected. But I know we did good. We made a killer ski for all conditions on our first shot and I hope it gains a reputation and sets a standard that makes people come back for it year after year. Thanks to all you maggots who have taken the time to ski them and post. We'll have more around at the minis, etc. Ya can't keep a good ski down.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    P-tex, CA
    Posts
    8,753
    I tried the Pro Bros this past weekend and here's my review:

    http://www.vidbusters.com/~casey/Bro_1.JPG

    Tester stats: 6'2" 195 lbs....so you can compare with your quiver.

    He skis stiff skis from the 207 Pinhead Igneous mid-fat (stiffest flex they ever made), 195 Igneous Fat Carvers, 188 Volkl G4's, 190 Volkl Explosives, Kingswood (NZ) 185 Fats and Mid-Fats (Gnar Kills), 222 RD Valdez Extreme.

    Boots: Tecnica Diablo Magesium 28.0

    I only rode the Pro Bros...the stiff ones.

    Vets review from last week of the Pro Bros was pretty right on.

    The 188 size is perfect.

    The tail is more twin than I thought, more like a G4 shaped tail. So if you were concerned about that, you can still pull your 180's in the park or on the groomed.

    The graphics are very nice. Nice blues and browns that go nice with the brown sidewalls.....differently cool. My brother right away said he wanted a sticker of the Jet in the logo.

    The Ride...I was expecting the skis to not flex by reading all about these on the board. However, it didn't feel like the Pro Bros were as super stiff as talked about, but then again I'm used to stiff skis (see height/weight/skis above). The stiff boards still have a nice flex to them....so don't think that they are made of steel. They have a cadillac feel ride and power through anything. The turn initiation much like Vets said needs a little power to get the ski to rail. Don't get me wrong, you really need to be paying attention and be on-it to get the most out of these (pro) boards. Once the turn is railing, the sweetness of the tail's flex kicks in and slices through any ice rink.

    Thanks to Vets and Splat for the demo....hope this helps the prospective buyers.http://www.vidbusters.com/forums/htm...cons/johnb.gif
    Last edited by skier666; 11-23-2004 at 02:01 PM.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,102

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by splat
    Looks like yours will ship tomorrow, DJ.
    Sweet. Fucking sweet. I just kicked my mom in the face. Christmas comes early for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by splat
    I will continue to rant, scream, harass and whatever needs to be done until every one of these skis are shipped. Thanks, you guys.

    -splat
    And this is why PM Gear and the Bro Model will be successful.


    I heart Splat.
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,623
    Quote Originally Posted by Merlyn
    Definitely looking forward to my soft Bro's - Idris told me that the regular softs are a good bit stiffer than the supersoft proto's.
    Idris is right on--the supersoft protos are so soft, I thought they wouldn't be skiable on the palmer gnar--which proved to be incorrect, as they skied just fine, even for this guy who prefers stiff iggies/w105s--mtnlion will be liking them in the pow for sure. I brought a friend up to Hood that day (a 5'5" girl who usually skis 178 g4/b3s) and she LOVED them even thought they were the longest skis she has ever tried. The production softs are quite a bit stiffer, which is a good thing IMO.
    Thanks for all the hard work Splat--you know you can call me any time you need to vent!

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Ski-attle
    Posts
    2,220
    So how much are these things again??
    And splat - you read my review, right?

    edit:
    Quote Originally Posted by natty dread
    The production softs are quite a bit stiffer, which is a good thing IMO.
    They are? I thought their stiffness was perfect. I wouldn't want to see them go softer. Any more words on this?
    Last edited by divegirl; 11-23-2004 at 02:45 PM.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Warm, Flat and Dry
    Posts
    3,307
    If I remember my discussion with Splat correctly, the demo fleet is comprised of production stiffness versions. I still need to get onto some though so I can finalize my decision.
    "if the city is visibly one of humankind's greatest achievements, its uncontrolled evolution also can lead to desecration of both nature and the human spirit."
    -- Melvin G. Marcus 1979

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    634
    The tail is more twined than I expected. The pics on the website don't represent the roundness of the tail. I decided against the bros because I thought the tail was flatter and squared off.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,623
    Quote Originally Posted by divegirl
    So how much are these things again??
    And splat - you read my review, right?

    edit:

    They are? I thought their stiffness was perfect. I wouldn't want to see them go softer. Any more words on this?
    I guess I didn't make myself clear divegirl. I was saying that the production softs that you skied are quite a bit stiffer than the supersoft original protos that mtnlion snagged. I too think the softs you skied are perfect.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Telenater
    If I remember my discussion with Splat correctly, the demo fleet is comprised of production stiffness versions. I still need to get onto some though so I can finalize my decision.
    Nater, what binders are you putting on them?

  14. #39
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Warm, Flat and Dry
    Posts
    3,307
    Quote Originally Posted by CS
    Nater, what binders are you putting on them?
    UTBs. Tried Hop's and I'm a convert.
    "if the city is visibly one of humankind's greatest achievements, its uncontrolled evolution also can lead to desecration of both nature and the human spirit."
    -- Melvin G. Marcus 1979

  15. #40
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Quote Originally Posted by divegirl
    So how much are these things again??
    And splat - you read my review, right?

    Sent you a pm, girl. Read your review? That was one hell of review for anyone to write, let alone some hot redhead jongass newbie killer ski chick!

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Telenater
    UTBs. Tried Hop's and I'm a convert.
    No kidding?

    Hmmmm.

    You let me jump on the Bro's if I lug my ass to Tahoe this winter? I always wondered about those bindings. You prefer 'em over Bishops and Linkens?

  17. #42
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Warm, Flat and Dry
    Posts
    3,307
    Quote Originally Posted by CS
    You let me jump on the Bro's if I lug my ass to Tahoe this winter? I always wondered about those bindings. You prefer 'em over Bishops and Linkens?
    Honestly haven't skied the new Bishops though I've heard good things (talk to Telephil about them). I do like the way they ski better than the Linkens. They're slightly more active, have a really tight toebox and very nice control. They also weigh about 2/3 of what a the linkens do and for most spring stuff will eliminate the need for separate crampons and will effectively be step in.

    Any time we run into eachother, you'll be welcome to give my bros a try (but I am one of the last in line to get mine). I might even mount mine with both Linkens and UTBs for comparison purposes.

    end of hijack.
    "if the city is visibly one of humankind's greatest achievements, its uncontrolled evolution also can lead to desecration of both nature and the human spirit."
    -- Melvin G. Marcus 1979

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Telenater
    Honestly haven't skied the new Bishops though I've heard good things (talk to Telephil about them). I do like the way they ski better than the Linkens. They're slightly more active, have a really tight toebox and very nice control. They also weigh about 2/3 of what a the linkens do and for most spring stuff will eliminate the need for separate crampons and will effectively be step in.

    Any time we run into eachother, you'll be welcome to give my bros a try (but I am one of the last in line to get mine). I might even mount mine with both Linkens and UTBs for comparison purposes.

    end of hijack.

    Cool, thanks man. I'm eager to ski the Bros and to see how they do over the long haul of the season since I figure I'll be needing new boards next year.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    900
    I've been following this whole thing since its inception and I'm quite inpressed that you've pulled this off, starting with gloves and quickly moving up to bigger and better things. My girlfriend doesn't understand why I'm always on the board, and telling her stories of how a bunch of internet people have designed their own ski and are actually manufacturing it.
    You guys are awesome! I could handle being added to the "blemished" list if you are selling the "blemished" top sheet skis later. I can't afford the real thing but would like to give them a shot.
    Awesome Job!

  20. #45
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Finally got some momentum going and some skis have been shipped and some stiffs pressed. We'll ship again Monday and Tuesday.

    edit: You peeps whose skis will arrive next week (for Gonzo,tomorrow) the skis need tuned. We've been tuning them at 1 base,2 side. If you're doing a lot of grooms, you might want to try 2-2. They will also require a couple good waxings. Enjoy.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver/Langley
    Posts
    1,685
    Quote Originally Posted by splat
    the skis need tuned. We've been tuning them at 1 base,2 side. If you're doing a lot of grooms, you might want to try 2-2. They will also require a couple good waxings. Enjoy.
    edge bevels?? http://tetongravity.com/forums/image...s/confused.gif requesting translation from shop monkey lingo to layman's words. The waxing part I get.

    You make it sound like the skis must be tuned on receipt. I'm not planning on spending much time on grooms, would I just need to do the waxing or will I get a benefit from edge/base work?

    PS splat my email's been down, did my softs go out with that batch? please please please say yes

  22. #47
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Sorry, Pulver, if you're in Surrey, you're a ways down the list. There's 14 deliveries for softs, 15 stiffs ahead of you. They only need tuned if you use the edges. Just a suggestion.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver/Langley
    Posts
    1,685
    Quote Originally Posted by splat
    There's 14 deliveries for softs, 15 stiffs ahead of you.
    [punched in the gut]oooooof![\PITG] Thanks......for the tuning feedback. My softie Bros are gonna see nothing but deep wonderful pow so I don't really need no steeeeenkeeeng gapicski edges.

    I know you're busting ass to get the boards out the door but are you talking a couple of weeks or are these later ones pushing out closer to Xmas for delivery?

  24. #49
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    We hope to have everything out the door by Xmas. We are making 100 pair for another company concurrently and are trying to get the shop to a stride that increases pairs of Bros per day/week so we can get them shipped out. Keep the faith, mang, we're getting there.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    394
    Skiied the soft Bros at Kirkwood today and they were FUN, Felt really stable and fast. Please say you're still planning to make a shorter (but not softer) version next season. Thanks Vets.
    Last edited by Redskea; 11-25-2004 at 07:47 PM.
    'I dare to dream and differ from the hollow lies'

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •