Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: ski boot quiver question. wtf?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    not close enough
    Posts
    2,488

    ski boot quiver question. wtf?

    Yeah, there's been a lot discussed on this already, but I'm special so I started my own thread.


    I'm thinking I might opt for the BD Factor, but I'd be lugging a heavier/stiffer boot up climbs where I'm sure I'd could be more comfortable on that uptrack with say the Scarpa Spirit 3. That said, I'm not sure how well the spirit 3's would accomodate my skiing style on the way down. Faassst, aggressive, and semi hucky. I'm also about 210 in gear, so take that into consideration. I like long sufferfest tours, but I am doing it mostly for the descent.

    I'm skiing the Dalbello Il Moro ID w/ stiff tongue on resort days, and really like the smoothness of flex, though I must say they can be a bit soft at times. Now, if I opt for the BD Factor, is there complete overlap here? Should I ditch the Dalbello's and ski the Factors on resort days too? Or keep the dalbello's opting for the cheaper and tour specific spirits?

    WWMD? Please help.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    MT
    Posts
    4,020
    What bindings are you touring on? That could be a factor here. It also depends on what skis you are driving, and how much you rely on a stiff boot vs. good form for your skiing style.

    Personally, I am going with something light for touring specific missions, then my resort boot is staying relatively stiff. (Flexxon and tlt5)

    For me, it works great. If I want to jump and charge sidecountry, I could ski barons/dukes with my alpine boots, but if I want to just tour, I have the tlt5 dynafit setup.

    If you are going somewhere far enough to be considering the spirit 3, then I would reconsider jumping off of stuff big enough to warrant big boots unless you have a good way to get packed out of there with a broken leg/binding.

    All of this said, I weigh a lot less than you, like 150# in gear.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    not close enough
    Posts
    2,488
    Quote Originally Posted by single View Post
    What bindings are you touring on? That could be a factor here. It also depends on what skis you are driving, and how much you rely on a stiff boot vs. good form for your skiing style.
    FFR + and Dukes, will pick up D-fits next season or if finances allow it, sooner. Ski's are all 190+ length/105mm + underfoot, and I rely on a little of both really.

    Quote Originally Posted by single View Post
    For me, it works great. If I want to jump and charge sidecountry, I could ski barons/dukes with my alpine boots, but if I want to just tour, I have the tlt5 dynafit setup.
    I toured in my alpines last year, and they worked decently even on longer 5k+ climbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by single View Post
    If you are going somewhere far enough to be considering the spirit 3, then I would reconsider jumping off of stuff big enough to warrant big boots unless you have a good way to get packed out of there with a broken leg/binding.
    Excellent point.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SnoqWA
    Posts
    2,685
    With FFR+, dukes, and big skis, you won't like the spirit 3s. Especially at your size and for the terrain you're describing, I don't think you'll like them one bit. If you don't like the idea of too much overlap with the alpine boots, perhaps consider something inbetween the spirits and factors as far as stiffness (quadrant, method, radium, skookum maybe)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    812
    Yea, Quik, Take a look at the Quadrant. They just showed up here and are super light for the amount of boot. Can't wait to get out on them.... Great on the up and the down..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    not close enough
    Posts
    2,488
    ok, you guys are right. I'm not too worried as much about boot overlap as I'm worried about about a boot that doesn't ski well... regardless of its touring capability.

    edit: 2 Alive, any idea of an approx flex rating on the quadrant? Not finding anything in the flex rating thread here in TT.
    Last edited by QuikR12; 10-08-2010 at 05:50 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In the shadow of the moon
    Posts
    2,742
    edit: advice rescinded

    Hate the Ducks?

    I hope your feet blister early and often
    Last edited by DeathVan; 10-09-2010 at 11:28 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by QuikR12 View Post
    edit: 2 Alive, any idea of an approx flex rating on the quadrant? Not finding anything in the flex rating thread here in TT.
    The BD website says it's a 120 (to the Factor's 130). http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com...boots/quadrant

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    not close enough
    Posts
    2,488
    Quote Originally Posted by skiborsy View Post
    The BD website says it's a 120 (to the Factor's 130). http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com...boots/quadrant
    Thanks man, checked those out and they are sweet, besides the colors ( i hate the fuggin ducks!).

    So it's now the Factor vs BD quandrant & Dalbello Krypton... I like the sound of that combo.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,027
    The Factor has been my only boot since it came out. After pulling the stock liner and putting in intuitions, the weight is on par with the Spirit 3. I'm considering getting the TLT5, but only if finances allow. If I did that I'd stick with the Factor for a few more years for resort and sidecountry use (getting a new pair of intuitions this year) and think about replacing with a dedicated alpine boot after taht.
    "High risers are for people with fused ankles, jongs and dudes who are too fat to see their dick or touch their toes.
    Prove me wrong."
    -I've seen black diamonds!

    throughpolarizedeyes.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NZed
    Posts
    99

    tecnica agent bc

    along these same lines is the new tecnica agent bc. (not to be confused with the at which is a soft 3 buckle boot) I just ordered a pair after a lengthy conversation with a rep. I would be interested to hear from someone who has actually skied in these though (yes i tried search...) I'll attempt to post a review once i've tried them

    flex is a tecnica 120 w a lighter plastic than their race boots
    102mm last
    4 buckle

    edit: and they have a dynafit insert which is why i was interested, I only hope it is done better than the saloman version...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    55
    Can anybody tell this jong if the quadrant work in ISO DIN Alpine bindings with it's vibram soles and slightly rockered toe, or is it restricted to AT bindings?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Middlebury, VT
    Posts
    1,995
    Quote Originally Posted by Ninjaskis View Post
    Can anybody tell this jong if the quadrant work in ISO DIN Alpine bindings with it's vibram soles and slightly rockered toe, or is it restricted to AT bindings?
    Uhhh..Nope.
    "I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."- Alan Greenspan

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    55
    Is that a

    Nope, no one can tell me,
    Nope, they don't work in Alpine bindings, or
    Nope, they aren't restricted to AT bindings?

    This is from the Backcountry.com product description, just wanted to make sure it's accurate.

    "Binding Compatibility: All AT and Alpine bindings"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    55
    After trying to google the answer to my question and ending up back in this thread, I figured I would bump it to see if I have any better luck.

    I was considering the BD Quadrant for a quiver-of-one boo. I would like to know if I will be able to use it in my Fritschis and my Salomon STH 12 alpine bindings. I have heard that, because the Vibram sole changes the release properties, shops wont mount them for liability reasons. Is this true?

    Any light on this would be appreciated.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    sfbay
    Posts
    2,179
    AT boots don't work in alpine bindings, unless they have a swappable sole which is specifically DIN compatible. A vibram sole is not DIN compatible.

    You can get AT boots to fit into many Salomon bindings (if they have adjustable toe wings - STH12 does not), but because they fit doesn't necessarily mean they work. Many people have success with this, but you'd have to judge for yourself.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •