Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Line Bindings?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4

    Line Bindings?

    I am thinking about purchasing the new Line Reactor bindings. Is anyone skiing on them? Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    In the fields, under the yoke
    Posts
    3,342
    Quote Originally Posted by RipCord
    Thoughts?
    Tech talk. Search function.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tawho Citti
    Posts
    1,531
    Why don't you buy them, ski on them, and then give us a report?

    TECH TALK, JONG.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,136
    Cool idea. Looks neat. Might save your knee.

    Heavy as hell: (150-200% the weight of other alpine bindings on the market, and thats before a mounting plate if you want to put them on non-Line skis)

    Expensive as hell (150-200% the price of other alpine bindings). Made up for by interchangable factor.

    Adjustable to whatever boot size.

    Few breakage reports (VIS != actual DIN, broken toe). Doesn't seem failure prone yet, but first model year time will tell.

    I'm keeping my Looks.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Under the bridge, down by the river
    Posts
    4,881
    Quote Originally Posted by RipCord
    I am thinking about purchasing the new Line Reactor bindings. Is anyone skiing on them? Thoughts?
    would you want to ski on a reactor? I think not. That shit could blow up, pollute, and then you'd piss off the Whelk.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    3,627
    and then be drown.
    Craig Kelly is my co-pilot.

    Buy Your Lift Tickets in Advance and Save

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4
    Looking for a lighter binding, so I'll probably pass on them if they are that heavy.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    416
    i think anything from a company new to producing bindings is sketchy. that shit's too important to trust seomthing new and unproven. just read today 4frnt's making some now too.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    On the early flight from San Diego
    Posts
    1,021
    The Reactor's were designed by an engineer with a few decades of experience with other company's, so I think the design is sound. The weight is definitely an issue.

    4FRNT is a completely different situation. They are essentially buying bindings from a company that's established in Europe but doesn't distrubute in the U.S., and marketing them as 4FRNT.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    2,490
    Discussed here
    "Steve McQueen's got nothing on me" - Clutch

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    72
    I have a friend who has broken two pairs of line bindings (he is back on Looks now). He broke the lock that holds that back heel piece in place both times. Stetchy. I wouldnt recommend it, wait till they work out all the kinks and until them stick with a name you already trust.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,315

    this is neat

    1. go to a shop with a line reactor binding put on a line ski for display.

    2. set the ski on the floor.

    3. hold the brake up and twist the heel of the binding as if it were releasing from the heel in a binding eject situation.

    4. take note of how the brake gets stuck on the top of the ski causing the brake to not drop.

    5. think of sending your ski down the hill and or stunt ditch and looking for it, loosing it or killing a small child or wild animal.

    6. ask the sales staff at the shop what they think of this.

    i think line has some great ideas, but they got some work to do still.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    2,490
    Here is a VIDEO (Quicktime) from Line's site showing a load test for the Reactor verusus a competitor. Don't quote me on the accuracy of the test, cause I don't know.
    "Steve McQueen's got nothing on me" - Clutch

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Mcwop
    Here is a VIDEO (Quicktime) from Line's site showing a load test for the Reactor verusus a competitor. Don't quote me on the accuracy of the test, cause I don't know.
    "Holy fucking Gawd - Jeesus!"

    At least we now know where Winnebago Man has found gainful employment...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    2,270
    Quote Originally Posted by BC-FLOW
    1. go to a shop with a line reactor binding put on a line ski for display.

    2. set the ski on the floor.

    3. hold the brake up and twist the heel of the binding as if it were releasing from the heel in a binding eject situation.

    4. take note of how the brake gets stuck on the top of the ski causing the brake to not drop.

    5. think of sending your ski down the hill and or stunt ditch and looking for it, loosing it or killing a small child or wild animal.

    6. ask the sales staff at the shop what they think of this.

    i think line has some great ideas, but they got some work to do still.
    Doesn't the release spring bring the heal piece back to center allwoing the brakes to deploy?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Lurch
    Doesn't the release spring bring the heal piece back to center allwoing the brakes to deploy?
    it didn't on the set we were messing with at our shop. go to a shop and try it yourself and decide what you think. IMO it looked like a bad thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •