Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: Democratic Lawyers lining up for a paycheck.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,629

    Democratic Lawyers lining up for a paycheck.

    Here we go again. Same old schit again. Dems are going to turn Ohio into another 2004 Florida.

    Kerry spokeman: "Inapproriate call in Ohio. We are challenging all the votes untill they are counted" AP

    So in otherwards folks. This board will continue to be more about politics instead of skiing. No matter how killer the early season freshies the brothers/sisters in the west are getting. More crap will take away from the stoke.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Behind the Zion Curtain
    Posts
    5,200
    Quote Originally Posted by TJ.Brk
    This board will continue to be more about politics instead of skiing.
    Especially with choice ass threads like this.

    BobMc

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    113
    Do the democrats still want to change it so the popular vote is what determines the election and not the electoral colleges? What an exciting race. Looks like we're going to have to wait it out 11 days before we know, though.

    Edit: Do you think the president should be elected based purely on popular vote? I mean, that's what a democracy is, right?
    Last edited by swiss powda; 11-03-2004 at 02:13 AM.
    Math illiteracy affects 7 out of every 5 people.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,629
    Quote Originally Posted by swiss powda
    Do the democrats still want to change it so the popular vote is what determines the election and not the electoral colleges? What an exciting race. Looks like we're going to have to wait it out 11 days before we know, though.

    Edit: Do you think the president should be elected based purely on popular vote? I mean, that's what a democracy is, right?
    Yes I do think it should be done by a popular vote. And yes that is a democracy. Unfortunately I voted for Nader. He didn't even carry 1% in most states

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    4,334
    Quote Originally Posted by TJ.Brk
    Yes I do think it should be done by a popular vote. And yes that is a democracy. Unfortunately I voted for Nader. He didn't even carry 1% in most states
    At least Blurred lives in America... who cares who you voted for, unless we decide to invade Canada next.
    OOOOOOOHHHH, I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    in a frozen jungle
    Posts
    2,374
    Democracy is the desired illusion, however, we happen to reside in a Republic
    (now with atleast 50 million disenfranchized voters With all branches of the government in unequivocal control of one party, we really have less in common with other democracies and more in common with those beacons of enlightenment like Russia and China! So I'm going to go ski Fresh! So much for 10 charactors!
    Scientists now have decisive molecular evidence that humans and chimpanzees once had a common momma and that this lineage had previously split from monkeys.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    4,956
    Quote Originally Posted by TJ.Brk
    Yes I do think it should be done by a popular vote. And yes that is a democracy. Unfortunately I voted for Nader. He didn't even carry 1% in most states
    Wait one damn second here ... how is a moron ex-jarhead expatriate residing in Canada allowed to vote in a U.S. election?
    Balls Deep in the 'Ho

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    champlain valley
    Posts
    5,830
    expats can vote by absentee ballot in the US jurisdiction they were last registered in

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North of South, South of North, West of East
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Svengali
    With all branches of the government in unequivocal control of one party, we really have less in common with other democracies and more in common with those beacons of enlightenment like Russia and China!
    That is one of the most moronic statements I have heard in a long time. Mine and your political leanings may not be in line with the majority (and that majority may be as slim as 51/49%) but this country politically has nothing in common with countries like Russia and China.

    This country is not a democracy, it is a representative republic. The electoral college serves the purpose that it was set out to serve in the Constitution, and it's not going away anytime soon. The people have spoken with their votes as far as the Congressional elections go.

    Questioning the leadership of the country in an informed and educated manner is fine with me, but comparing the administration of this country to that of Communist countries is neither of those.

    The person I voted for got even fewer votes than Nader.
    I should probably change my username to IReallyDon'tTeleMuchAnymoreDave.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    in a frozen jungle
    Posts
    2,374
    Teledave,? what part of my statement did'nt you understand
    "Democracy is the desired illusion, however, we happen to reside in a Republic "

    My comments regarding Russia and China serve as a parallel to those who believe it is good to have one party in charge of the whole shitting match



    Communism is/was an unrealized ideal, an illusion if you will(also an economic system and not a form of government)------just like Democracy(a form of goverment;here we practice the economy called"capitalism" aswell in china and russia) is in this country-----For this country to truly be Democratic the voter must have a direct and uninhibited path to the top------
    enough already----I think you are arguing semantics----our statements really are not that far apart!
    Last edited by Svengali; 11-03-2004 at 08:07 AM.
    Scientists now have decisive molecular evidence that humans and chimpanzees once had a common momma and that this lineage had previously split from monkeys.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North of South, South of North, West of East
    Posts
    1,728
    Svengali, I agree with what you are saying about the one party in control issues. I really think we should just get rid of parties altogether; or have 4-5 viable parties rather than the 2 we have now. All the 2 party system does is polarize the population. You are right I think we are arguing symantics and our views are probably not that far from each other. I will say that I found the comaprison to Russia and China inflamatory and that's what really drove my response.

    See you on the snow, maybe they'll have the election figured out by then.

    (Edit: No more politics for me today, it is done.)
    I should probably change my username to IReallyDon'tTeleMuchAnymoreDave.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    4,426
    I hope a court battle for the Presidency is not in our future. I would like to see a the electoral college stay but it wouldn't be all or nothing. The electoral votes would be divided based on the percentage of the popular vote for each state. This way when a state goes 51% to 49% to a candidate the 49% of voters could still be heard. I doubt this is likely to happen though.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    on the pointy end, calling the line, swearing my fucking ass off
    Posts
    4,682
    And John Henry (owner of the Red Sox) is making his personal jet available to the Dem. lawyers to get where they need to go.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Dave, who did you find to vote for that got less votes than Nader? Lyndon Larouche? Seriously, I'm curious.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North of South, South of North, West of East
    Posts
    1,728
    Michael Badnarik-Libertarian
    FWIW, if Bush hadn't been projected as a strong winner in TN I would've voted for him as the lesser of the 2 evils that were the Rep. & Dem. candidates.

    Edit: i wint to publick skoolz and don't spel so guud
    I should probably change my username to IReallyDon'tTeleMuchAnymoreDave.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Emulating the ocean's sound
    Posts
    7,008
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman
    Dave, who did you find to vote for that got less votes than Nader? Lyndon Larouche? Seriously, I'm curious.
    the green rainbow party got 1/3 of a percentage in mass. woot.

    Candidate(s) Office Votes Percentage
    David Cobb/Pat LaMarche President/VP 11,012+ 0.39%


    http://www.green-rainbow.org/grp_logo.gif

    why is the rainbow only green. that makes no sense.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Quote Originally Posted by basom
    the green rainbow party got 1/3 of a percentage in mass. woot.

    Candidate(s) Office Votes Percentage
    David Cobb/Pat LaMarche President/VP 11,012+ 0.39%


    http://www.green-rainbow.org/grp_logo.gif

    why is the rainbow only green. that makes no sense.
    Are you sure it's not the green slash rainbow party?

    'Cause an all-green rainbow would be spooky.

    Maybe that's why nobody voted for them. Too spooky.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,543
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman
    Dave, who did you find to vote for that got less votes than Nader? Lyndon Larouche? Seriously, I'm curious.
    Pat Paulsen. Oh wait--I guess he's dead now.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Fart Louderdale
    Posts
    633
    Quote Originally Posted by teledave
    Michael Badnarik-Libertarian
    Yeah, right. You voted for Fullmer, admit it .

    J-

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,490
    Quote Originally Posted by likwid
    And John Henry (owner of the Red Sox) is making his personal jet available to the Dem. lawyers to get where they need to go.
    Is Schilling the co pilot?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,373
    I'm gonna dip my toes in the water here and ask a somewhat serious question. I see on various sites that nothing is really determined yet and Ohio might take days to give the final tallies. I realize this sort of thing went down last time and I realize the States is a very big country but...what's up with that? I mean, how big are the polling stations that the votes can't be counted overnight? I've worked elections here in Canada and we don't leave until all ballots have been recorded. Granted, the States are 10 times as big, but shouldn't that correspond to 10 times as many people working the election? Count, add, report. Am I missing something?

    I understand that sometimes things are tight and recounts are needed etc., but can anyone explain these long delays in results without using the words "moronic" or "hapless" or "clusterfuck?"

    SaAaH (and honestly just curious),
    d.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,490
    We are as polarized down here as any time since Vietnam. We don't like each other, and certainly don't trust each other.
    We need the draft to really heat things up. Benny predicts that will be considered in '06. Sad to watch history go 'round and 'round.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North of South, South of North, West of East
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by gincognito
    "clusterfuck?"
    That pretty much describes our entire governement workings, regardless of which group is in charge of it. If our governement had any kind of efficiency we'd be, what's the word, "unfuckablewith".

    (Says the guy working for a quasi-govt. agency and typing on a message board at work.)
    I should probably change my username to IReallyDon'tTeleMuchAnymoreDave.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Emulating the ocean's sound
    Posts
    7,008
    gin, it's the ballots that were cast by people who for some reason didn't show up on the voting lists in their precincts, for whatever reason. those people get to cast a provisional vote, but their vote is not counted in the inital tally. if the sum of these provisonal votes is greater than the sum of the votes the state is won by, as is the case in ohio, then they are counted. but as they are counted they are also looked at for validity, and many of them get thrown out at that point. it is a painstaking process that aparently will last two weeks. i heard earlier this morning that 93% of those votes would have to be for kerry in order for him to pull ohio. in past senatorial elections the highest percentage of these votes theat has ever been counted has been 17%. so its a shot in the dark as it seems to me.
    Last edited by basom; 11-03-2004 at 10:30 AM.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Upland, CA
    Posts
    5,617
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane
    We need the draft to really heat things up. Benny predicts that will be considered in '06.
    While what you said before was correct, this last piece is moronic and completely wrong. Stop fueling inaccurate speculation done by morons who have no idea on the actual state of things.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •