Interesting. Never skied either but both have caught my eye before. Not sure I need that type of ski this year though.
Think I'm on:
185 praxis pows
192 GPOs
192 Bros
195 superbros
195 igneous (something)
181 Caylors
183 m103
18X bros of some type for touring
220 Salomon dh
Not sure if the GPOs or Bros will survive the year. Seems hard to justify both. Currently mulling over skinny, stiff RXs in case the Heads die but I probably could pick up another cheap pair
So many long skis. You need to work on your fitness.
Why did they have to make the 88 the prettiest?!
Reddddd
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Idk this is Lindahl, quoted from Blister
"Jonathan will be talking more about sizing w/r/t this Monster series of skis in his upcoming review of the Monster 98, but for the Monster 88, our recommendation is not to size up. In this narrower width, you still get good stability out of the 177 cm model, while also getting a ski that works well in moguls and tight spaces."
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
He also says you're skiing Zeus' pro model. Which is true
Its almost stupid how stable it is. You just zoom by everyone, yet it feels like just another stroll through the park. These things will get your pass pulled if your not careful. They make you want to ski figure 11, and they make it easy.
The 191 108 is really not that hard to ski at all, as long as your in semi-open terrain. Its not for noodling around at slow speeds, or anything very technical, but can easily handle bumps, and wider spaced trees at medium speeds just fine. Im sure the 98 and 88 just get easier.
Its like the camber and sidecut are really engaging, and there is quite a lot of "help" translating your input to the ski. The flex of the ski is like a 2x4, but squeezing the camber together is significantly easier than squeezing the camber of my noodly K2s. I have no idea how they make such a plank so easy to de-camber. Im not a very traditional skier, and although I cant "slarve" with them, they will perform bases flat, quick, precise movements and speedchecks really easily.
I find the sidecut on my 191 Wrens more "locked in", and straight. The wrens are harder to ski moguls with, than the 191 Monsters. The wrens are pretty close to as stable and smooth, maybe 85%, yet without the weight of the metal, so they float better..
The only flaw in the monster is weight, but that also makes them so smooth. Luckily, the weight is all underfoot, or atleast thats how they feel. The swing weight and balance feels phenomenal for how heavy they are. You only notice the weight at the very end of the day.
In short, its an amazing ski. One of my favorites, and my favorite non-On3p. Just slightly beating out the 191 Katana. The monsters are even more smooth than 191 Katanas, and even though they both have higher speed limits than I, I assume the Monster is more stable at mach looney.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Done. $200 shipped for 177cm Monster 83s flat.
If I was revamping the quiver entirely, maybe 88s would've made more sense. But now I've got alpine spacing of: 83 -> 99 -> 112 -> 118, and touring spacing of 94 -> 112.
Now, got to sell those ugly K2s for a nickle. And mount up the Monsters for a new quiver pick.
Speaking of steamrollers, did a mag buy those 200CM Stockli Stormrider pro? They were in Colorado discount skis and their eBay seller name. I was not man enough, would have bought if the 190 length - those were the not two lengths that ski came in. Last big man burly man ski stockli made or so I've heard . Betelgeuse- that may be the only burlier ski out there with a relatively ''modern' shape
I didn't see them or I would of grabbed them. They sound like a challenge
So if I was to sell the jjs or the patrons, what would be an approximate amount to ask? Patrons have 1.5 mounts, one for fks and then the demo mount but I reused holes, and the jjs have only one mount and have never seen snow.
Sent from my VS988 using TGR Forums mobile app
Bookmarks