seeking suggestions: 90-100mm ski

[Deuge]

Hi,

Im looking for some suggestions for a good all moutain / powder ski that will handle all conditions, including the groom. Im going to Japan early next year so i want a ski that ill enjoy over there, but also something that will handle Australian conditions (where i live) where we dont always get a heap of snow.

Ive already got a pair of Line Darksides which are 73mm underfoot, so i got the ice / hard pack side of things sorted (tho after a few 180's on them, the backs are bent! watch out...)

So yeah, im probably looking for something round the 90-100mm range. I've been told the Pocket Rocket is a good ski, but to be honest im looking for something a little stiffer than the blue noodle. Dont really want a ski thats 100+ cos then its gonna be useless in anything but deep powder & crud, so im looking for something thats more versitile & has a good rep.

suggestions??

[dubu]

my top choices

v-ex (sommone had to day it), the stiffest and least sidecut,
Tankers, they dont like ice and are work in moguls
sugar daddies, everyone likes them
Seth Pistol, by far the softest of the bunch but seem to handle very well

might want to consider
rex's or whatever they are called now.
and G4's

[joshbu]

ahem...

Bro Models

[seldon]

I recommend using http://tetongravity.com/forums/search.php? JONG.

[Deuge]

already have mate, and couldnt find the answers i was looking for.

thanks anyways.

[Ski Beaver]

Seldon can't offer advice, in fact his parents still tell him which skis they are going to buy him.

Oh , and he is good at deleting posts and threads that don't always work out for him.

Seldon, if someone such as Deuge asks for ski suggestions, provides details about what sort of skiing they like doing, what ski they currently have etc and genuinely wants to know of some other skis that they should look at.

It doesn't deserve a little smartarse coming in here offering no advice except for use the search function - Jong.

You could have at least said LP's - I hear your parents think they are good.

Rant over.

[Theodore]

[Bandit Man]

Most ski mags release their buyer's guides about this time of year...spend the five bucks and drool away...

Then get some V-Ex's...or Some Goat's...or a Karma...(you get the idea)

[Vets]

Bro Models - 99mm waist
and/or
Volkl Explosive - 95mm waist
and/or
Dynastar Legend Pro Rider - Not sure about the exact waist, but it will be somewhere in the 90's

What length are you looking for?

[seldon]

Honestly, except for powder, the gear guides are useless. The only ski over 90mm in SKI is the Apache Chief, and thats not much of a help when there's only one.

The search function is actually fucked up right now - which is probably why you're not getting any results.

If you want something on the stiffer, more crudbusting end of the spectrum I'd look into
-Volkl xploders- burly, stiff, a classic. there's gunna be a revolt when volkl tries to change the dimensions on these
-Bromodels - untested but all the indicators are good
-Tankers - never skied 'em but they're supposed to be similar in burl to the xploder
-Legend Pros - very similar to the bromodel. see dude_le and phunks reviews on these along with my overly excessive comparisons between these, the xploders, and the bros.


If you want something floatier and softer, I'd look at:
-Sugar Daddys - a favorite. a versatile ski, good in most conditions. slightly twinned.
-Gotamas - floaty and s'posed to be in the sweet spot for flex for pow sticks. word is that combined with freerides they make an unbeatable BC pow setup. not so good on hardpack.
-B3s - rossi dampness. rossi durability. its a tradeoff.

The massive skis fall into their own category:
-Spatulas
-Fischer Big Stix 1.06
-Big Daddies
-Powder Plus
But since this isn't really where you're looking, I won't go here.

Jib-ier Sticks:
-Seth Pistols - these fall into a couple of categories but are sposed to be much improved for this year
-Scratch BCs -a little too damp and spongy, but I've had a reasonably good time on these
-Pocket Rockets - whatever the answer, the question is "Why they suck"
-Head Moships - I've heard good things about these but neither flexed nor skied them
-Armada ARVs - see the other thread within tech talk about these
-4Frnt MSPs- a burlier twin. haven't skied it, but somebody on the board helped build these.

hopes thats a lil bit more helpful.

And for the record (a little bit late):
the only requirement my parents put on skis to which they will contribute ~1/2 is that they are from an established manufacturer - for the same reasons phUnk cites here:

Also, an unproven ski, even from PM Gear, is still an unproven ski. So it's pretty ridiculous that people are spraying about the Bro model quite this hard. ... I bet the ski is awesome, but I won't spray about it until I've ridden it myself or I hear first-hand experiences of a bunch of skiers I know.

edit for fixing the quote with a "]"

[Darkside]

Honestly, except for powder, the gear guides are useless. The only ski over 90mm in SKI is the Apache Chief, and thats not much of a help when there's only one.

The search function is actually fucked up right now - which is probably why you're not getting any results.

If you want something on the stiffer, more crudbusting end of the spectrum I'd look into
-Volkl xploders- burly, stiff, a classic. there's gunna be a revolt when volkl tries to change the dimensions on these
-Bromodels - untested but all the indicators are good
-Tankers - never skied 'em but they're supposed to be similar in burl to the xploder
-Legend Pros - very similar to the bromodel. see dude_le and phunks reviews on these along with my overly excessive comparisons between these, the xploders, and the bros.


If you want something floatier and softer, I'd look at:
-Sugar Daddys - a favorite. a versatile ski, good in most conditions. slightly twinned.
-Gotamas - floaty and s'posed to be in the sweet spot for flex for pow sticks. word is that combined with freerides they make an unbeatable BC pow setup. not so good on hardpack.
-B3s - rossi dampness. rossi durability. its a tradeoff.

The massive skis fall into their own category:
-Spatulas
-Fischer Big Stix 1.06
-Big Daddies
-Powder Plus
But since this isn't really where you're looking, I won't go here.

Jib-ier Sticks:
-Seth Pistols - these fall into a couple of categories but are sposed to be much improved for this year
-Scratch BCs -a little too damp and spongy, but I've had a reasonably good time on these
-Pocket Rockets - whatever the answer, the question is "Why they suck"
-Head Moships - I've heard good things about these but neither flexed nor skied them
-Armada ARVs - see the other thread within tech talk about these
-4Frnt MSPs- a burlier twin. haven't skied it, but somebody on the board helped build these.

hopes thats a lil bit more helpful.

And for the record (a little bit late):
the only requirement my parents put on skis to which they will contribute ~1/2 is that they are from an established manufacturer - for the same reasons phUnk cites here:


edit for fixing the quote with a "]"

Seldon, you go so put in your place. One minute you're ripping the guy, and the next you're writing him a review of every ski model out there.

[AltaPowderDaze]

deuge,
it sounds like you'd be happy with the b3. they're stable as hell and are tortionally stiff, yet longitudinally (mostly tip) have some play. my buddy has the 185 and enjoys them, even though they are short. he usually skis long stixs in the mid to upper 190's. they are 94mm under foot (i think) and pretty good all around. there are plenty of skis that will fit your description, this is just one.

[acostiga]

deuge,

i don't know much about anything, and i haven't been on many of the different/newer models of stuff out there these days- but i can at least report my personal experience... last season, when i was able to get out and ride, it was my first opportunity to use a pair of nordica beast 92's that i picked up off ebay. the price was right, so i figured that i'd give them a try- even though i live in pittsburgh and ski at a vertically-challenged resort named seven springs. the shop where my roomate works at as a second job didn't have a jig to mount bindings on a ski as wide as 92mm, which i thought was kind of amusing. anyhow...

the beasts are a good time. they're a wooden core ski, so there's plenty of life to them- which is a good thing because i'm over six feet tall and my weight hovers somewhere north of 200 lbs, depending on how much drinking and/or jogging i've been doing. the pocket rockets are a similar ski, but they're a foam core and thus not as likely to stand up to abuse over the long haul. i think i'd break lesser skis than the beasts, especially when my dumb ass tries to copycat the little flippy-spinny kids with flexible skeletons out in the park.

honestly, the width didn't bother me too much at all- even on hard, icy conditions. some skiers, and especially industry folks, make such a huge deal out of minute differences in lengths, widths, etc as if these details make or break the entire riding experience. of course i recognize that each ski is different, but i think my attitude about the skis i'm riding with is just as important as anything else. the beasts make me feel more confident. they're a stable platform, and at speed despite being shorter than the 205 GS skis that i was riding back "in the day" they feel light and agile yet stragely solid.

although i'm frequently the only person i ever see with wider skis at my home resort, it doesn't bother me a bit. yes, the skis might take some technique adjustment- but it's not a conscious effort for me. you just do what comes naturally to make the skis function how they're supposed to function. i'm probably being too vague, all apologies. give the beasts a chance if you have the opportunity to demo them... they could be what you're looking for.

[PNWbrit]

Honestly, except for powder, the gear guides are useless. The only ski over 90mm in SKI is the Apache Chief, and thats not much of a help when there's only one.

The search function is actually fucked up right now - which is probably why you're not getting any results.

If you want something on the stiffer, more crudbusting end of the spectrum I'd look into
-Volkl xploders- burly, stiff, a classic. there's gunna be a revolt when volkl tries to change the dimensions on these
-Bromodels - untested but all the indicators are good
-Tankers - never skied 'em but they're supposed to be similar in burl to the xploder
-Legend Pros - very similar to the bromodel. see dude_le and phunks reviews on these along with my overly excessive comparisons between these, the xploders, and the bros.


If you want something floatier and softer, I'd look at:
-Sugar Daddys - a favorite. a versatile ski, good in most conditions. slightly twinned.
-Gotamas - floaty and s'posed to be in the sweet spot for flex for pow sticks. word is that combined with freerides they make an unbeatable BC pow setup. not so good on hardpack.
-B3s - rossi dampness. rossi durability. its a tradeoff.

The massive skis fall into their own category:
-Spatulas
-Fischer Big Stix 1.06
-Big Daddies
-Powder Plus
But since this isn't really where you're looking, I won't go here.

Jib-ier Sticks:
-Seth Pistols - these fall into a couple of categories but are sposed to be much improved for this year
-Scratch BCs -a little too damp and spongy, but I've had a reasonably good time on these
-Pocket Rockets - whatever the answer, the question is "Why they suck"
-Head Moships - I've heard good things about these but neither flexed nor skied them
-Armada ARVs - see the other thread within tech talk about these
-4Frnt MSPs- a burlier twin. haven't skied it, but somebody on the board helped build these.

hopes thats a lil bit more helpful.

And for the record (a little bit late):
the only requirement my parents put on skis to which they will contribute ~1/2 is that they are from an established manufacturer - for the same reasons phUnk cites here:


edit for fixing the quote with a "]"

Seldon - how many of those skis have you actually ridden? Your "review" seems to only refer to your personal experience on Scratch BCs.

Please - until you have something worth saying - SHUT UP!

[Woodsy]

Stockli hand made swiss goodness
Stormrider SS pro or Dp or whatever they call it in your time zone.

[Bandit Man]

Honestly, except for powder, the gear guides are useless. The only ski over 90mm in SKI is the Apache Chief, and thats not much of a help when there's only one.

In contrast to other mags with glossy pages, I buy them just for the pictures, not the articles...

[Below Zero]

JONG!

I recommend every single powder ski out there because each all have qualities that someone out there enjoys!

These posts are so hard to answer. You don't even give your height, weight, sking style, skiing ability, and what kind of terrain you ski. How is someone supposed to be able to give advice.

If this was the Math section of the SAT, I would choose:

D - Not enough information

[descender]

deuge,
some skiers, and especially industry folks, make such a huge deal out of minute differences in lengths, widths, etc as if these details make or break the entire riding experience. of course i recognize that each ski is different, but i think my attitude about the skis i'm riding with is just as important as anything else.

True. I am guilty of this. As long as you go 90mm+ you will be happy, unless there are space robots your skis. But then again 100 is the new 90, so yeah, good luck:

Gotama 130-105-122 32m @190
Mad Trix Mo 125-90-118 22.4 @ 186
V Karma 119-87-111 22.4 m at 185 cm
ScatchBC 122-90-115 22.8 @ 188 21.3 @ 182
Armada ARV 125-92-115
S Pistol: 128-95-118 24m @ 189 21 @ 179
MotherShip: 127-97-117 21m @ 182cm 23 @ 192
Fischer 106 136-106-123 26m/180cm
BroModel 125-99-114 34m @188cm ?
N Beast 124-92-116
T@nker 125-93-116 26 @ 190
Dynastar LP 123-97-115 ? 122-97-117mm ?
K2 Apache 126-98-116 31m @188cm?
SugarDaddy: 126-99-116 29m @ 183
Explosive: 120-95-112 30.7 @ 180 35 @ 190
Stormrider 123-91-111 26 @ 186
Rossi B3: 122-94-112 25.5 @ 185
FRFNT MSP 122-92-108
DB Surreal 124-94-112
Atomic Powder Cruise 128/105/118
BigDaddy 133-107-123 34 @ 193
Head m103 126-108-118 41.5 @ 193cm
KS Kahuna 137-108-127
P Rocket 122-90-115 21 @ 185
old XXX 123-90-110
Insired Nob 117-89-110 27M
R:EX 115-84-107 21 @ 177
VPro 113-83-105 23.1 @ 180
ScratchFS 110-80-103
1080 114-80-108
PublicEnemy 113-80-103 20m @ 179cm

[phUnk]

It's not a fucking ski review if you've only "heard good things about them but never skied them" !

"I recommend Ski X even though nobody has skied it."

"I recommend Ski Y even though the damn [i]design[i/] hasn't been finalized yet."

Fucking victims of marketing. Unreal.



Big text == serious business.

[optics]

mmm.
Enough times for damn 10-limit.

[CS]

It's not a fucking ski review if you've only "heard good things about them but never skied them" !

"I recommend Ski X even though nobody has skied it."

"I recommend Ski Y even though the damn [i]design[i/] hasn't been finalized yet."

Fucking victims of marketing. Unreal.



Big text == serious business.

Whoa.

Deuge,
Listen to Woodsy.

[phUnk]

Whoa.

When they say Size=7, they ain't joking.

[Jumper Bones]

yo phUnk - move that forward slash, and the italics will actually work

[Deuge]

Hi, thanks for the replies guys! It is helping.

For those who asked, My height is 178cm, and weight 61Kg.

I'll convert from metric for u americans: height 5'8" and 135 pounds.

im a relatively advanced skier

cheers!

[Ski Beaver]

I would suggest eating more.