
Originally Posted by
Huckin eh?
I had a ski custom built by Wagner. Its a flat ski , no camber. Its 133, 104, 122. Its a good ski for powder. its actually a pretty strange but cool sensation. It will sink into the powder cos its not too fat, then it shoots you back up and out just after you pressure the ski and make it flex. Its a medium-stiff ski so it wont flex right away.
I like it, and to be honest I am still getting used to it, but I still preffer my rockered toons with the pin tail as I know the tails wont ever catch on any variable surface.
I agree though, for the market swing, there should be a few more flat skis on the market, but they kinda suck on groomers.
Keith at Praxis made me a pair of demo Back Country's this summer with some carbon in them for added stiffness, as he rates the standard BC as a 5 flex and I wanted something closer to 6-7. He also made my pair with flat camber, it has a nice gradual tip rocker that I think will either blow through or float over crud/cut up snow and the tails have just a gentle rise, not a true twin tip. At 130-105-120 it sounds similar to your Wagner's. Due to the tip and tail rocker, the running length on hard packed snow looks pretty short. It is a 190 ski, but looks like a 170 if your not in soft snow to engage more of the ski. I can hardly wait to try them on those in between days where there is between 6"-12" on the mountain. I am hoping they give me the confidence to hit those conditions at a higher speed than I could sac up for on my Goliaths.
Never in U.S. history has the public chosen leadership this malevolent. The moral clarity of their decision is crystalline, particularly knowing how Trump will regard his slim margin as a “mandate” to do his worst. We’ve learned something about America that we didn’t know, or perhaps didn’t believe, and it’ll forever color our individual judgments of who and what we are.
Bookmarks