Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 45

Thread: Opinions on definition of "vertical feet"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Øøøtahhh
    Posts
    2,780

    Opinions on definition of "vertical feet"

    Many of you know that I do the VerticalFeet.com site. It has turned into a great reference site and gets a ton of traffic. I like to be as accurate as I can with the info I've gathered on the hundreds of resorts.
    I've got an accuracy question and I need some opinions. I'm getting a few emails questioning how I'm defining one of the entries. I'm going to go with the majority opinion of you hard-core maggots on this one:

    Should a ski resort's lift-accessed vertical drop measurement include terrain accessed by a cable tow that only runs a few weeks per season?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Impossible to knowl--I use an iPhone
    Posts
    13,182
    Unfortunately, maybe, yes.
    Not that much different from a lift that's often on wind-hold or something like that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Park City, UT
    Posts
    1,789

    Re: Opinions on definition of "vertical feet"

    Originally posted by Endlessseason
    Should a ski resort's lift-accessed vertical drop measurement include terrain accessed by a cable tow that only runs a few weeks per season?
    Is the resort you refer to Snowmass?

    I think, technically it would be included. I mean, it is a lift, it does run, albeit rarely. Perhaps you can add a disclaimer that it's a tow? Refine lift accessed to chair/tram accessed?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Eagle River Alaska
    Posts
    10,962
    2,100 appx. feet
    Alyeska - Girdwood, Alaska
    and the base is 250 feet freaking little mountains here
    Its not that I suck at spelling, its that I just don't care

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,125
    What not using the poll option?

    Yes, IMHO, absolutely.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Øøøtahhh
    Posts
    2,780
    Originally posted by Ski Monkey
    Is the resort you refer to Snowmass?
    Yes.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,545
    I'd say that, yes it should be counted. The fact the lift doesn't run all the time doesn't matter.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North of South, South of North, West of East
    Posts
    1,728
    It counts in my book.

    A) It's a lift. Doesn't matter whether it's a surface lift or a 100-person gondy. Some of the best terrain in the world is accessed by surface lifts.
    B) What lifts are open all season? Whether it is rarely open or not doesn't disqualify it's existence. Would you include the Marte in your ranking of Las Lenas? (Hypothetically, of course)

    Just my $0.02. Sounds like somebody in mktg at a nearby area that just gets beat out on vertical because of it is whining to me.

    Edit: After looking at your site, maybe its the other way around.
    Last edited by teledave; 10-24-2003 at 08:22 AM.
    I should probably change my username to IReallyDon'tTeleMuchAnymoreDave.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    7,581
    yes, include drags even if infrequently open. a lift is a lift!

    when are you gonna start doing euro resorts???? would be great to compare. i could help you out with the swiss ones! quite a few will bump whistler from that top spot.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,145
    List both and put an asterisk by the one with the rarely run lift. I mean next thing you know they'll want foot access terrain counted for vertical!
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,837
    "161 feet
    Boyce Park - Boyce, Pennsylvania"

    i bet that place rips



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,763
    The only way to measure vertical feet is lying down.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Eagle River Alaska
    Posts
    10,962
    he did you get the email about alpenglow
    Its not that I suck at spelling, its that I just don't care

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Carbondale, CO
    Posts
    130

    Thumbs up

    You have to include it. Some years the Cirque only runs a few weeks but other years like this past season it was running for several months (I'm thinking feb-april but don't recall the exact opening date). The snow levels where about average so hopefully the Mtn. and patrol are starting to prioritize getting and keeping this terrain / lift open.

    Crested Butte's High Lift would probably fall in the same catagory.
    There's only one law ya can't break .......embarrassing a cop in public.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Powpow New Guinea
    Posts
    2,981
    Originally posted by dipstik
    "161 feet
    Boyce Park - Boyce, Pennsylvania"

    i bet that place rips


    I've been there and its siiiiiiiiick, brah.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    4,647
    I'd say yes, include it, but put some sort of notation. Or maybe even list the resort twice - once including the top and once with only the part where it's normally open.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Nowhere near Boner City
    Posts
    1,135
    Probably depends on the gender of the person taking the measurements(?)
    Signature removed for non-payment

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Halfway Between the Gutter and the Stars
    Posts
    3,857
    A lift is a lift. If it gets you any vertical anytime it should be counted.
    You are what you eat.
    ---------------------------------------------------
    There's no such thing as bad snow, just shitty skiers.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North of South, South of North, West of East
    Posts
    1,728

    Re: Opinions on definition of "vertical feet"

    I'm really disappointed that no one has inserted a pic of a certain maggete showing some vertical feet .

    But I couuldn't find it.
    I should probably change my username to IReallyDon'tTeleMuchAnymoreDave.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Bend, WA
    Posts
    741
    Yes.

    As long as it carries folks up the hill at least once a season it should count as part of their lift system.
    Good runs when you get them.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Snoqualmie
    Posts
    1,298

    Angry

    Slight thread hijcak:

    Crystal: 3102'? No way. That's way too high.

    In fact, from the trailmap:

    Base = 4400' Silver King = 7013' Vertical = 3100'

    Yet, 7013 - 4400 = 2613.

    So where did that extra 500' come from, eh?

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Impossible to knowl--I use an iPhone
    Posts
    13,182
    I'm sure Buster and others who have actually been there can explain this, but I believe at Crystal their vertical can't be accessed continuously.

    edit: just checked the Crystal site and map, and they say the vertical includes something they call 'backcountry return', so I guess maybe they run a shuttle down below the bottom lift??
    Last edited by Dexter Rutecki; 10-27-2003 at 06:26 PM.
    [quote][//quote]

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    EWA
    Posts
    23,141
    Originally posted by Dexter Rutecki


    edit: just checked the Crystal site and map, and they say the vertical includes something they call 'backcountry return', so I guess maybe they run a shuttle down below the bottom lift??
    Yup - ff you ski Northback you have to catch a bus to get back to the area.
    When you see something that is not right, not just, not fair, you have a moral obligation to say something. To do something." Rep. John Lewis


    Kindness is a bridge between all people

    Dunkin’ Donuts Worker Dances With Customer Who Has Autism

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Behind the Zion Curtain
    Posts
    5,208

    Re: Re: Opinions on definition of "vertical feet"

    Originally posted by teledave
    I'm really disappointed that no one has inserted a pic of a certain maggete showing some vertical feet .

    But I couuldn't find it.
    This you mean?

    http://www.outdoorsinutah.com/Mir.jpg


    BobMc

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Snoqualmie
    Posts
    1,298
    Originally posted by KQ
    Yup - ff you ski Northback you have to catch a bus to get back to the area.
    That's true. I just never thought that was 500 feet vert. Learn something new every day.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •