Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 52

Thread: Phantoms new fatties

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Soon to be Denver
    Posts
    23
    And.. If Elan has a simialr ski coming out.. I dont think the new fad in Fat sks is that far off

    New length !80

    middle 120

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    tawhore
    Posts
    698
    Originally posted by skiphant
    And.. If Elan has a simialr ski coming out.. I dont think the new fad in Fat sks is that far off

    New length !80

    middle 120

    um, are you serious. The Elan SCX was one of the original "super-sidecut" skis back in the day. It isn't produced anymore, that I know of, because I think the skiing public thought that much sidecut was a little ridiculous. I

    f you need that much help turning the ski something is wrong. IMO.
    steezarific!!

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Soon to be Denver
    Posts
    23
    feel as you may.. all I know is that I started skiing again for the 1st time last season on these skis I was doing Double diamonds and backcountry at jackson hole with no problem at all.. as far as i know not many skis can offer that.

    If these arent your deal.. then no worries.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado Cartel HQ
    Posts
    15,931
    Originally posted by skiphant
    feel as you may.. all I know is that I started skiing again for the 1st time last season on these skis I was doing Double diamonds and backcountry at jackson hole with no problem at all.. as far as i know not many skis can offer that.

    If these arent your deal.. then no worries.
    Dude, with gaped out posts like this, you've opened the door to all kinds of ridicule. BakerBoy is the sweetest skier here, you should spancer him....he was in Powder magazine this month you know.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    4,334
    Originally posted by BlurredElevens
    Dude, with gaped out posts like this, you've opened the door to all kinds of ridicule. BakerBoy is the sweetest skier here, you should spancer him....he was in Powder magazine this month you know.
    Get it right focker, it was last months. And being "able to ski" at an area like Jackson Hole isn't really representative unless you are an east coast person (where Phantom is phrom), and then its a lost cause, since we have poor ignant people from NY skiing on Spatulas. Then again, there's hope afterall!
    OOOOOOOHHHH, I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Soon to be Denver
    Posts
    23
    i didnt say it was impressive, just that I'm still startin out.

    I'm just a lady that likes her skis- and that's all

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Montrial
    Posts
    1,000
    super-snoolers
    shut up and ski

  8. #33
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Slut Lake City
    Posts
    7,785
    Originally posted by skiphant
    I'm just a lady that likes her skis
    How you doin'?

    http://skiingismylife.com/media/quagmire.gif

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    It's gorges here
    Posts
    950
    Lemme see if I got this straight:

    - Someone made a ski specifically for skiing dense, uncut north eastern glades. They're advertised as having a tighter turn radius than any other ski or snowboard. From the copy on the website it looks like they're aiming for the middle-aged intermediate/advanced skier group.

    - A bunch of extremo-mountain dudes who like to go fast and straight are ripping on the skis and those who ski them.

    Does this strike anyone else as a bit silly?
    My dog did not bite your dog, your dog bit first, and I don't have a dog.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,373

    Thumbs up

    Originally posted by Will
    Lemme see if I got this straight:

    - Someone made a ski specifically for skiing dense, uncut north eastern glades. They're advertised as having a tighter turn radius than any other ski or snowboard. From the copy on the website it looks like they're aiming for the middle-aged intermediate/advanced skier group.

    - A bunch of extremo-mountain dudes who like to go fast and straight are ripping on the skis and those who ski them.

    Does this strike anyone else as a bit silly?
    Yes. Well said. From what I've heard, they do what they were designed to do very well. And some folks who don't want to like them, do.

    Sick and ashamed and happy (and let's all bag on Ski and Epic next),
    d.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,302
    Ski and Epic suck.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,373
    Originally posted by iceman
    Ski and Epic suck.
    So do oranges.

    Sick and ashamed and happy (and going way back),
    d.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1
    180cm tall & 120cm in the waist-wow! Finally somebody gets it.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Slut Lake City
    Posts
    7,785

    Thumbs down

    Originally posted by Derek Fisher
    I'm somehow related to Phantom. Here's some hype!

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Impossible to knowl--I use an iPhone
    Posts
    13,182
    Originally posted by gincognito
    Yes. Well said. From what I've heard, they do what they were designed to do very well. And some folks who don't want to like them, do.
    Yeah, I had fun on 'em the day I skied 'em. I woulda been on 196 GS skis, or 190 Head Supercrosses that day otherwise, so I was really unsure, but in the middle of ultra-tight (tighter than anything you've skied in the west, I can guarantee you) trees, they were really the only option.
    Also, you can easily carve a 360 in the middle of a half-pipe.
    [quote][//quote]

  16. #41
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Slut Lake City
    Posts
    7,785
    Originally posted by Will
    Does this strike anyone else as a bit silly?
    Skiphant never said that's what they were designed for. They were just pitched to the general Maggot populace. Hence, ripping ensued.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    It's gorges here
    Posts
    950
    Originally posted by phUnk
    Skiphant never said that's what they were designed for. They were just pitched to the general Maggot populace. Hence, ripping ensued.
    Good point, perhaps she should have.
    Pound away then.

    (which it looks like your avatar's already doing)
    My dog did not bite your dog, your dog bit first, and I don't have a dog.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,288
    Originally posted by BakerBoy
    since we have poor ignant people from NY skiing on Spatulas. Then again, there's hope afterall!
    Was this supposed to be a poke at me by any chance? Yes, I do have Spatulas, but get it right, I live in NJ, damnit!

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Soon to be Denver
    Posts
    23
    ok- so i didnt exactly mention that they were Area specific (thought i did). I'm kind of an ass clown sometimes.
    but w/ dims like those- they wern't exactly made for racing

    just saw the chicken suit pics, you guys are fantastic. if theres any pics of a chicken mooning Bush- i'll pay good money for those.

    ~ sorry for the delayed resp.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    On your left
    Posts
    1,272
    I believe they call those thing snowblades!

    Mark my words - folks are going back to big. The guys on the world cup on going back to 200's+ for GS, SGS and downhill. Don't get me wrong, they will never be on 225's again but those things look like something my grandma would put on her feet.

    Stop jibbing in the park and make big turns on real skies - something around a 100 underfoot in a 198 please.
    why make ten turns when you only need to make NONE!

  21. #46
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado Cartel HQ
    Posts
    15,931
    I've been saying this for years, short skis are a FAD. They went through THE SAME THING in the seventies. You CANNOT go as fast in bumpy terrain with a shorter ski!

    And that being said, all "new" skis that don't have reverse sidecut/camber are NOT new skis. Only a difference of flex, width and sidecut. If youre going to present something as "new", don't do it with a design thats been around for 100 years.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    167
    Originally posted by BlurredElevens
    If youre going to present something as "new", don't do it with a design thats been around for 100 years.
    has skiing been around for 100 years?

    i want to see an epic thread on this ski. "the sidecut dimensions, along with the angular roational force of the skiers left foot make the ski unstoppable on naturally occuring focrces of nature."
    I was amazed at how light and fluffy the powdery snow was and at how the challenge never ended.
    -Charles Kelly, CT

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    The Garden State
    Posts
    4,907
    Originally posted by elevens
    I believe they call those thing snowblades!

    Mark my words - folks are going back to big. The guys on the world cup on going back to 200's+ for GS, SGS and downhill. Don't get me wrong, they will never be on 225's again but those things look like something my grandma would put on her feet.

    Stop jibbing in the park and make big turns on real skies - something around a 100 underfoot in a 198 please.

    What a relief!
    Haven't I seen you at the morning rope drop at the Londonderry transfer station? That's where I get all of my boards... Hands off my Siderals!!

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    On your left
    Posts
    1,272
    I've been cutting down some shruberry this summer around those parts.

    All we need is snow
    why make ten turns when you only need to make NONE!

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    A little to the left
    Posts
    2,361
    Originally posted by skiphant
    I started skiing again for the 1st time last season on these skis
    A: Strange choice of people to have represent your product in this forum.
    B: Strange person to have directly involved in the development of this product.
    C: Both.

    ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •