Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Infrared Photography (cool)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    north by northwest
    Posts
    9,456

    Infrared Photography (cool)

    Last edited by f2f; 03-10-2009 at 09:14 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MT
    Posts
    889
    that is some really cool stuff. the subtlety of the color changes is what makes it so good, i think. I've been toying with the idea of making an infrared setup myself.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NOLA
    Posts
    1,777
    holy tits that's sweet! I fear it'd become cliche pretty quicklike (more than the 5 photos you posted) but those horses are awesome. How do you take shots like that?
    Hail Ullr

  4. #4
    Those are very nice. I bought an old Sony f828 that has been modified for infrared an have just started playing around with it. I think a modified DSLR is in my near future.

    The colors in these pictures are "false" colors. The files don't come out of the camera even remotely resembling these. I'm not sure how to recreate those in PS but after seeing these I am going to learn.

    Thanks f2f.

    This is what I have gotten so far. Xpost from Picture of the Day thread.






    Bleck! They kind of pale in comparison to the color. I am going to have to learn how to do that.
    Last edited by Rubicon; 03-10-2009 at 10:14 PM.
    it's all young and fun and skiing and then one day you login and it's relationship advice, gomer glacier tours and geezers.

    -Hugh Conway

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Used to shoot IR film all the time back in school. 89b filter (Dark red) and some good Kodak HIE film made for some very cool pictures. We also learned to put some matte black gaffers tape on the film pressure plate to keep the halation down, but sometimes that "blooming" effect was kinda cool.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    north by northwest
    Posts
    9,456
    Quote Originally Posted by Rubicon View Post
    Bleck! They kind of pale in comparison to the color. I am going to have to learn how to do that.
    here's some color film info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrare..._infrared_film

    but, i suspect, you can use any colorization techniques to make the infrared BW look like color photography (the originals do feel like they were colorized post-factum).

    glad you like it. my particular interest is in figuring out how things that don't necessarily perceive visible light may see the world

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dramarado
    Posts
    1,717
    Quote Originally Posted by f2f View Post
    my particular interest is in figuring out how things that don't necessarily perceive visible light may see the world
    Naked! From wikipedia: "Also, some clothing is transparent in the infrared, leading to unintended (at least to the manufacturer) uses of video cameras."

    It would be fun to modify an old DSLR and play with infrared images.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainwreck View Post
    Naked! From wikipedia: "Also, some clothing is transparent in the infrared, leading to unintended (at least to the manufacturer) uses of video cameras."
    NSFW....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    318 Powder Lane
    Posts
    3,647
    there's some pretty cool stuff search UV+IR photography. Also there are some pretty cool GIMP filters to simulate IR and UV type of photos. And since gimp and its filters are free, much cheaper than high end IR filters.
    fighting gravity on a daily basis

    WhiteRoom Skis
    Handcrafted in Northern Vermont
    www.whiteroomcustomskis.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dramarado
    Posts
    1,717
    I am looking around for an old D100 body now to try this. Apparently the D100 sensor is pretty good for IR and UV even without a conversion.

    For the Nikon guys: http://nikongear.com/smf/index.php?board=57.0

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    das heights
    Posts
    2,542
    that shit is sick. thanks for the post

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    206
    I just started playing around with IR film & an opaque filter. These are from the first batch I've had that were properly exposed. They're not really great photos, but I was excited that they turned out








  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Nice! I love IR!

    You are aware that you have to shift the focus a bit for IR, no? From an old Leica manual:
    Images formed by infra-red rays focus slightly further back of the focal plane formed by visible light. To compensate for this the lens should be racked out about 1/200 of it's focal length, with the exception of the 35mm and 28mm lenses whose depth of focus takes care of the matter.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by Tippster View Post
    You are aware that you have to shift the focus a bit for IR, no?
    Yeah, I'd read that. I just set the aperture to f/16 and hoped for the best. The film (Efke Aura) doesn't have an anti-halation layer, so that might be contributing to the fuzziness.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4
    It was more than thirty years ago when I last experimented with photography in infrared. Too much hassle: special film handling, black-and-white processing, inability to evaluate results (and adjust settings) until the whole roll was exposed and pictures were printed...

    Now this has changed. Due to the arrival of digital photography, we can take infrared pictures whenever we please, mixing them with "normal" ones, and see results on the spot, tweaking the settings to our hearts' desires...

    All depends, of course, on how your camera sensor array reacts to the infrared — and, depending on the filter you are using, to the far red end of the visible spectrum.


    If you want more information about this ... go here

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dramarado
    Posts
    1,717
    I've been working on it but have yet to have a good image come out. I got the focus issue handled, working on exposure and post-processing, but the hardest part IMHO is composition.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Quote Originally Posted by powellperry19 View Post
    Now this has changed. Due to the arrival of digital photography, we can take infrared pictures whenever we please, mixing them with "normal" ones, and see results on the spot, tweaking the settings to our hearts' desires...[/IMG]


    If you want more information about this ... go here
    As you point out, that's pseudo-IR, since most CMOS and CCD Sensors have anti-IR filters installed. You need to modify your camera to get true electronic IR images, and then your camera isn't much very for regular color photography anymore.

    Might be kinda cool to modify an old cheap Rebel... hmmmmm.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dramarado
    Posts
    1,717
    Here's a full visible light shot of a spruce and aspen against the sky. The camera has the internal cut filter removed so this is recording ultraviolet and infrared as well as visible light. The IR reflectivity in foliage is very apparent but the sky came out looking quite natural, the only post processing I did was to lower the exposure a bit (still refining my on camera technique).

    I took some shots with an IR-pass filter too, I'll see how they come out after processing.

    Last edited by Trainwreck; 04-21-2009 at 01:06 PM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,708
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainwreck View Post
    Very cool shot.
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dramarado
    Posts
    1,717
    With an IR filter then tweaked to add more blue.


  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    north by northwest
    Posts
    9,456
    i knew about heat signatures for buildings, i now know about infrared photography, but i just didn't put two and two together... this article gives me an idea, with your IR camera you can go to your neighbours and for a nominal price offer to show them where they're leaking heat in the winter and cold in the summer:

    http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04...ehold-changes/

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpine Meadows, CA
    Posts
    4,461
    Not my picture, but cool nonetheless. A picture of yesterday's space shuttle launch.

    **
    I'm a cougar, not a MILF! I have to protect my rep! - bklyn

    In any case, if you're ever really in this situation make sure you at least bargain in a couple of fluffers.
    -snowsprite

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Oxnard, CA
    Posts
    264
    If you have an old sony camcorder that takes photos you can probably shoot your own Ir photos on the cheap. Just get some heavy ND filters and turn on night shot mode then take photos in daylight. I used a sony PC33 i think to take this a few years back.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •