there doesn't appear to be enough structural damage to warrant surgery?
Like many others here, I have shitty knees. Right MCL was injured 9 years ago and was rehabbed to good strength, but it still clicks and pops and over the years it's become sore and painful after intense activities. Left knee had similar soreness issues and got worse when I flat landed a big air in the terrain park a year ago. I stopped running 7 years ago because it feels like I am getting stabbed in the back of my knees with a knife.
I'm still able to snowboard, cycle, and backpack - with Ibuprofen and minimal time on the bike trainer to keep the muscles stable - and have just dealt with the pain and inflammation. Every once in a while I put a load on one of my legs that causes a sharp pain and I have to stop and readjust my leg or whatever.
I have good insurance now and see a local knee doc this morning. The xrays are clean - bone spacing is decent and the kneecap is in a good place though closer to the bone than in most people. No signs of structural damage and his range of motion and torque tests aren't enough to produce any sharp pains or anything, just areas of sensitivity. So he thinks any surgery would be overkill.
He says to just go to PT and not worry about MRIs since I am getting through my activities okay - and that getting from "good knees to great knees" can be hard. I don't even think I have "good" knees. I think I have functional knees that suck ass when I'm carrying more than 30 pounds or riding more than 30 miles on my bike or riding hard through firm snow.
Anyways, should I just resign to the fact that my knees are shit and go into PT with no MRI? Or should I really push for the MRI to see if it's going to tell me something else that would be important to know?
Bookmarks