Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Unstable layers in Sea to Sky corridor snowpack

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442

    Unstable layers in Sea to Sky corridor snowpack

    Bulletins are all from MCR - Mountain Conditions Reports - http://www.acmg.ca/mcr/ to subscribe.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Message: 1
    Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:41:34 -0800 (PST)
    From: Public Mountain Conditions Report <mcr@informalex.org>
    Subject: [MCR] Musical bumps
    To: mcr@informalex.org
    Message-ID: <1829.24.87.200.29.1230658894.squirrel@mail.sunbow l.ca>
    Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

    Went for a tour on the N side of Flute yesterday. A largely overcast day
    with moderate SW winds and a few ?exquisite? sunny breaks in the
    afternoon. The skiing in the upper alpine was quite wind affected and not
    particularly great. As you approach tree line the surface conditions
    improved along with the skiing.

    Safe to say that we skied conservative lines and tip-toed our way around.
    As reported by many the upper snowpack is quite interesting if not a
    little unusual for the Coastal region. 15cm of low density (F) new snow
    over a 15cm (4F) slab over 10cm of cold low density (F-) facets all
    resting on the December 6th crust. Though this ?sandwich? made for
    descent skiing it also made for very challenging uptracks as skies
    continually collapse through to the December crust.

    We experienced regular whumping especially in thin rocky areas and any
    area peppered with small trees. Though there have been numerous reports
    of Skier accidental and remotely triggered avalanches we were unable to
    ski cut any features and saw little natural avalanche activity. Whistler/Blackcomb did produce numerous size 1-2 avalanches from ski
    cutting on specific terrain features and from explosive control work

    With forecasted precipitation and wind for the remainder of the week I
    would expect the load and slab properties in the upper snowpack to
    dramatically increase along with the hazard level. It is very likely that
    the facet layer overlaying the December crust may be with us for a very
    long time.



    Keith Reid
    ACMG/IFMGA Mountain Guide
    Whistler BC
    keith@reid.bc.ca


    ------------------------------

    Message: 2
    Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:58:48 -0800
    From: Public Mountain Conditions Report <mcr@informalex.org>
    Subject: [MCR] Diamond Head/ Paul Ridge, South Coast
    To: <mcr@informalex.org>
    Message-ID: <00ca01c96afc$1590be00$40b23a00$@com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

    Greetings West Coasters,



    Considering the limitations of terrain that I would want to be on right now,
    we opted to give bigger areas a miss today and do a short day tour up at
    Diamond Head/Paul Ridge Area, thinking there could me more options for
    skiing low angle terrain.



    Just below the high point of Paul Ridge, the total snowpack depth was around
    160 cm . We decided to have a look in the snow. About the sketchiest I have
    ever seen it up there. At the site we dug our profile, we found 110 cm of
    mostly unconsolidated snow sitting on 15 cm of ballbearing facets above the
    hard crust that was buried in early Dec. We also found a (almost hidden)
    3-5mm surface hoar layer down 75cm below the snow surface. The surface hoar
    layer sheared easily with a 'pop', and the facet layer was so weak it was
    almost falling out of the pit.



    Even though the trail breaking was not difficult (skis only penetrated 25
    cm), stepping out of the skis had us sinking almost up to our waists.



    Heavy 'Whumfs' reverberating in the snowpack near ridgetop had me really
    thinking about the terrain I wanted to be on. Sure enough, we were able to
    trigger a LARGE size 2 avalanche (from jumping on safe terrain above the
    slope, after I had someone watch from the side to make sure there was no
    skiers/boarders below). It was at the top of the widest bowl off the north
    side of Round Mountain (NE Side) for those that know the terrain. The
    avalanche was 60-85 cm deep, 60 m wide, running 150m down almost to the
    flats. Even though the failure plane was on the surface hoar, I think it
    would have stepped down to the facets and crust if the terrain had been
    bigger (wider and longer bowl), or the slab properties a bit stiffer.



    There was plenty of blower pow to be had up there, but have to admit there
    are many lines up there I wouldn't touch today.
    Many groups heading into the Elfin Lakes hut for New Years. Good time to use
    the designated 'winter route' with the orange stakes.



    Keep in mind this weak snowpack is very unusual for the Coast, and is not
    likely to heal quickly. Stick to low angle terrain, well away from avalanche
    slopes above. If you are not really sure what this means, or have difficulty
    holding back when you see those big powder lines, it might be best to enjoy
    the in-bounds slopes for a while.



    Brian Gould

    Mountain Guide

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Whistler
    Posts
    2,066
    Thanks Lee.
    == | slacktopia | ==
    http://twitch.tv/fugitivephilo
    still bangin' beats

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •