Does this belong here?
![]()
Does this belong here?
![]()
Originally Posted by grrrr
Sure, why not. Now take a couple pics from the other end and post them in the Ullr thread in the padded room.
...Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain...
"I enjoy skinny skiing, bullfights on acid..." - Lacy Underalls
The problems we face will not be solved by the minds that created them.
Cell phone pic with effects, skiing in the front yard
![]()
some college ski racing stoke.
![]()
You're goddamned right it belongs here, Willbert.
Duh?
how do you guys feel about the 800-wide image limit in the new forum setting?
_______________________________________________
"Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.
I'll be there." ... Andy Campbell
I don't believe mine was scaled at all. 1024x683. For an example, scroll up 2 posts to JCE's. His is 800 pixels wide.
I opened a new photoshop image, enabled the rulers and made them the length of my image underneath and it seems to be right on. This isn't the most ideal way to do it, but it certainly is over 800 wide. Maybe they lightened up a bit? I certainly didn't like the limitation. Maybe limit over 1500 wide or something?
_______________________________________________
"Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.
I'll be there." ... Andy Campbell
Weird. I've got an email request into the developers to limit it to 1200 in the biggest dimension and scale from there since no one else is answering. Do you think that is sufficient? I believe that scaling is important because I was sick of dicks intentionally posting 5###x3$$$ images and fucking up my window.
www.dpsskis.com
www.point6.com
formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
Fukt: a very small amount of snow.
Not so much recently but the scaling was brought up in numerous threads in the past and the general consensus was to scale gigantic images. I don't agree with the minute 800x600 with today's higher resolution monitors though. That would have been ideal in, what, 1990? For today I think an image with 1400 or 1200 as their biggest dimension will fit on most modern screens without scrolling and not look too small. Nothing I hate more is having to scroll a picture and not get the whole thing in one viewing, especially if it is a nice picture.
My $.02
repost from Tahoe thread. Digging my (new to me) EFS 10-22
![]()
_______________________________________________
"Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.
I'll be there." ... Andy Campbell
them
me
it
![]()
6x12 pinhole, Argyrotype on Weston watercolor paper.
A couple with the macro lens
and an epic sunset...cropped & sharpened but otherwise straight OOC
![]()
We've won it. It's going to get better now. You can sort of tell these things.
Don't laugh - I got these neon things at Conrads in Garmisch for 75% off - and I LOVE them with Dukes on them. Tons-O-Fun and they scare Germans.
![]()
From a couple of hours ago. We decided to go have a 'fun' workout today and climb the big 'ol sand dune about 10 kms from the house. Turned out to be a great time - and a very good leg/lung workout.
Going up
Running down
Footprints in the sand. There were actually three of us, but I was carrying Jesus. Dude isn't as light as he looks!
![]()
My son and I finally got our first day skiing together this winter. We did our usual race and he kicked my butt, skiing switch!!
BBRidgekid - haulin ass
![]()
Maldives
![]()
This is a bit old, but just got around to posting it. New Year's Day from the summit of Crystal.
![]()
My orders came through. My squadron ships out tomorrow. We're bombing the storage depots at Daiquiri at 1800 hours. We're coming in from the north, below their radar.
Bookmarks