Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: Choice of fat skis

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735

    Choice of fat skis

    K2 Apache Chief 181 or 188, 126/98/116


    Scott Santiago Mission 183 130/90/116


    Scott Santiago Pure 188 132/92/117



    Bro Model 188 125/99/114 (no pics)


    Imagine you are 5'10'' and have the choice between these 4 stick, which would be your choice for powder, crud and bc in general and why (without considering price)?

    Please discuss!

    Last edited by Hicks; 08-01-2004 at 03:58 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,246
    Definitely Bro's. Too much sidecut on both of the Scotts and the K2s are probably a lot softer than I like. Plus, I have a feeling the Bro's are going to be a lot more durable (P-tex 6000 bases, double-size edges, etc.).

    edit: the graphics are waaaaaay better too!

    Last edited by Dantheman; 08-01-2004 at 04:47 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Emulating the ocean's sound
    Posts
    7,008
    also, buying skis from friends is cooler than buying skis from k2. to my way of thinking.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    881
    Gotama v's Bro model?

    Any thoughts.
    Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of resume's in the bin without reading them.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,838
    I've got one: apples vs. oranges.

    go

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Logan, Utah.
    Posts
    2,053
    I'm not at all biased, but here's something to chew on.

    Bro Models = bigger Rockwell edges. (Bros on the left, Head Monsters on the right). When she says size doesn't matter, she's not talking about your edges. Bigger is better:



    Here's a full lineup with all of the Bro prototypes in the mix. The Bros in the middle are the closest to the production ski:



    Keep in mind these pics are of the proto's which have white/blank topsheets. Also, the finished bases will be black, not clear like with the protos.
    Last edited by Twoplanker; 08-01-2004 at 06:49 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    5,017
    Originally posted by Twoplanker


    Here's a full lineup with all of the Bro prototypes in the mix. The Bros in the middle are the closest to the production ski:



    Wow. I'll take that quiver with a few sets of freerides and some skins to go with 'em.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    tropicana
    Posts
    1,176
    the phase FKNA! comes to mind

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    the ether
    Posts
    6,389

    Talking

    Originally posted by iskibc
    Wow. I'll take that quiver with a few sets of freerides and some skins to go with 'em.
    you want fries with that??

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735

    Wink

    Thanks everybody who posted senseful stuff here.
    TP, the collection above just makes me frickin' jealous.

    Although the sidecut on those sticks is quite different as mentioned but then why are still many pros riding boards with a lot more sidecut than the Chiefs or Bro Model, is that just because these guys ski a lot better than anyone else or the sticks just turn better? And why are skis on the market with a 141 shovel and a 90-92 waiste?

    Aside from that, 5'10'' = 176 cm. 188 cm perhaps too long except for perfect pow?


    Discuss!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Eagle River Alaska
    Posts
    10,962
    Originally posted by Hicks

    Aside from that, 5'10'' = 176 cm. 188 cm perhaps too long except for perfect pow?
    Seems fine to me, more length just means more float in things like windbuff and funky cruddish but kinda soft stuff, the only thing it'll suck in is bumps but who skis bumps seriously? I personally ski on 178s wich are too short IMO but thats the longest they make PEs, my skate skis are 195s and my classics are 210 though, and damn they are intersting in icy turny hilly situations
    Its not that I suck at spelling, its that I just don't care

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    4,334
    Originally posted by Hicks
    Although the sidecut on those sticks is quite different as mentioned but then why are still many pros riding boards with a lot more sidecut than the Chiefs or Bro Model, is that just because these guys ski a lot better than anyone else or the sticks just turn better? And why are skis on the market with a 141 shovel and a 90-92 waiste?
    Because pro's are paid to ski on a certain brand of ski, and different brands have different ideas of what kind of sidecut is best....

    Why are there skis on the market with reverse sidecut and reverse camber? Why are there "skis" on the market that are 100cms long and not kids skis? Why does ak_powder_maggot relate stories of his skinny-ass XC skis when he talks about downhill boards?!? Who knows...
    OOOOOOOHHHH, I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735
    Originally posted by BakerBoy
    Because pro's are paid to ski on a certain brand of ski, and different brands have different ideas of what kind of sidecut is best....

    Why are there skis on the market with reverse sidecut and reverse camber? Why are there "skis" on the market that are 100cms long and not kids skis? Why does ak_powder_maggot relate stories of his skinny-ass XC skis when he talks about downhill boards?!? Who knows...

    Thanks BB, good enough.

    But let me ask you the real question then: What works better in your opinion for bc conditions overall (I'm talking about really shitty snow too, not only the perfect pow dream where pretty much every carpenter's board in any lenth works)?
    Thanks

  14. #14
    Vets's Avatar
    Vets is offline Orange Mocha Frappuccino!
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Topaz, NV
    Posts
    3,893

    Re: Choice of fat skis

    Originally posted by Hicks

    Bro Model 188 125/99/114

    Imagine you are 5'10'' and have the choice between these 4 stick, which would be your choice for powder, crud and bc in general and why (without considering price)?

    Please discuss!
    I can imagine that I am 5'10" because I am. I was fortunate enough to demo the Bro Model up at Hood last weekend. I'm buying that ski. I haven't tried the other skis you showed in order to compare them to the Bro Model. I do know that the Bro Model is a high performance ski that is versatile, unique, and a pleasure to ski on. I'd post a link to my review along with others if the forum database was working correctly. (I'll can add it in an edit when things are functioning correctly)

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735
    Vets,

    How do they compare to a pair of 190 Explosives then (if that's possible for you) in pow and junk snow?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5,917
    What is the sidecut on the Bros vs. the Apache Chief?
    "Can't vouch for him, though he seems normal via email."

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Orangina
    Posts
    9,653
    Yo Hicks and SkiBeav,

    a) In my opinion, lots of sidecut doesn't always suck, but it really depends on what sort of conditions we're talkin'. For instance, if you're getting some fatties that you'll often be using on groomers, then sidecut ain't that bad. BUT, if you're getting fatties for steeps and variable conditions, then lots of sidecut means that the tips and tails can "hook up" and cause some trouble. That's why, in example, the "gordy stock XXX's" have reduced sidecut...and it works.

    b) Gotamas vs. Bromodels really is apples to steaks. I'd imagine that the Bromodels are somewhat similiar to XXX's in that they're fat and stiff. This makes them ideal for crud, variable conditions, speed and steeps--and they prolly rail the groomers pretty well, too. The Gotamas are the ulitmate ski---only in powder. But the flex combined with their float and feel makes them more fun when the pow is uniform and consistent...they're like surfboards and because they're pretty soft, you really get to feel the powder as opposed to sheets of steel like the XXX's. So, no comparison, if you ask me. Two different animals.
    "All God does is watch us and kill us when we get boring. We must never, ever be boring."

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735
    Originally posted by The Reverend Floater
    Yo Hicks and SkiBeav,
    In my opinion, lots of sidecut doesn't always suck, but it really depends on what sort of conditions we're talkin'.
    As stated before I am talking about skiing groomers on the way back to the parking lot, else I got an ole' x-scream for shit and giggles. But I'm also talking often shitty b/c conditions we have here more often than we like to admit. And to conclude a Bro model with it's waiste being better in 2' upwards than any of the other sticks mentioned (except Gotamas maybe) and lenth doesn't matter in such conditions makes sense to me without further question, too. Before I throw a couple of 100 Bucks on the table I wanna be damned sure that I spend it right.
    But thanks anyway.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    verbier, milan, isla de pascua
    Posts
    4,806
    sorry hicks, it's all second hand but there's one guy in verb who used the mission lately and was very happy with them (Olivier at www.mountain-guide.ch)
    Hope can be of help

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    verbier, milan, isla de pascua
    Posts
    4,806
    Originally posted by verbier61
    sorry hicks, it's all second hand but there's one guy in verb who used the mission lately and was very happy with them (Olivier at www.mountain-guide.ch)
    Hope can be of help
    said that......
    C'mon, pick up a Bro until the euro is at 1.2something
    It can't be wrong

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735
    Verb,

    are you a nurse or what?

    You think each time I wipe my ass the paper converts to Greenbacks.......

    But thanks for the reference, maybe will give this guide a call.....to make splat nervous!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    verbier, milan, isla de pascua
    Posts
    4,806
    Originally posted by Hicks
    Verb,

    You think each time I wipe my ass the paper converts to Greenbacks.......



    hehe it's always funny to talk here about Scott USA sticks that are actually UNAVAILABLE in USA......

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735
    Originally posted by verbier61


    hehe it's always funny to talk here about Scott USA sticks that are actually UNAVAILABLE in USA......
    ...and my grin is always freezin' like after a knee shot when they talk about all the Voelkls coming outta here and only being available over ...there....

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Snoqualmie
    Posts
    1,298
    If it helps at all, the Apache Chief has a real nice flex to them. They aren't soft at all, very similar to explosiv only wider.

    Only time will tell if they are just as durable.

    Of course, if you buy the bros, you can be one of about 3 people on the continent who has a pair...

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735
    Josh,

    so did you ski the Apache? Rumours I heard tell the same about the flex.
    Not sure about the Bros yet, although I'd love to support a fellow maggot like splat for his courage.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •