I am kind of an old schooler and late adopter but have been on plastic boots for about 13 years now. One thing he may not like at all about a lot of plastic tele boots is how difficult it is to flex the bellows. Fortunately, there are some options that are less stiff in the bellows than others and so will be closer to the feel of leather and more easy to adapt his technique to. The higher end boots will generally be much stiffer and harder to get the feel of the ball of his foot on the ski with but of the three brands, Crispi probably has the most leather like feel. But more important than that is getting him a boot that fits his foot well. With thermo liners these distinctions are less pronounced than before but in general, conventional wisdom says that Scarpa fits a narrower and lower volume foot. Garmont fits a wider and higher volume foot, and Crispi fits a wider and lower volume foot. Also, you can't always go just by a straight size conversion, especially with Scarpa because they run big. New models run more true to mondo point size than the older ones that appear to have US sizes but in Scarpa's case, you have to assume they are UK sizes. Don't take the size off the tongue but from the shell itself.
I would say in your dad's case, a T2 class boot would be suitable. These are three buckle boots that are on the soft side. T2 is the Scarpa model. I am not sure what the other makers product names are that correspond to that but you can get a lot of information from the respective companies' web sites and also of course from http://www.telemarktips.com .
As far as skis go, my thinking is that there is no real difference between tele skis and alpine skis unless you are talking about ScottyBobs with their differential and offset sidecut. Since he cares more about powder and backcountry than anything else, a ski with a softer longitudinal flex will be more fun than a stiffer model. Some folks will tell you that you can't drive a big ski with a boot as soft as a T2 but that is pure bullshit that comes from people who have no idea how to tele in leathers. Your dad will be able to ski anything in T2s. What he will like best will come down to personal preference.
Bindings offer a lot of options in terms of how they perform or assist performance. A lot of tele skiers like what we call an "active" binding, meaning one that configures the pivot point farther back so that it helps with leverage to break the bellows. With a softer bellows and a larger person, some folks, like myself, don't feel the need and prefer a neutral binding that leaves the job of breaking the bellows to the skier. A free pivot mode (such as with an AT binding) is nice for climbing and breaking trail in powder and there are a few options with that. Probably the lightest, simplest, and least futzy of these would be the Voile Switchback.
I boiled my thermometer, and sure enough, this spot, which purported to be two thousand feet higher than the locality of the hotel, turned out to be nine thousand feet LOWER. Thus the fact was clearly demonstrated that, ABOVE A CERTAIN POINT, THE HIGHER A POINT SEEMS TO BE, THE LOWER IT ACTUALLY IS. Our ascent itself was a great achievement, but this contribution to science was an inconceivably greater matter.
--MT--
Bookmarks