Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Montana creek access issues...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6

    Montana creek access issues...

    Hey all,
    Spoke with a couple of locals up in the Helena area and have confirmed that access to Falls Creek,MT (class IV-V+ - Dearbrn Trib.) has been completely cut-off. The reason given thus far is disrespectful kayakers and trespassing kayakers on private land.
    For those of you unfamiliar with this creek - Falls Creek began being run regularly around 2004. There are several good class IV drops, a sweet and lappable 20-foot waterfall and far and way the cleanest/largest runnable waterfall in the state of MT IMHO, a fifty-foot plunge from pool to pool. This creek coupled with a run on the Upper Dearborn(right up the street) provided a great opportunity for diverse crews of creek boaters to paddle together for a full weekend of mellow IV to V+ and at the same time satisfy the needs of the entire lot with a jaw dropping backdrop to boot. (There are good photos and short write-ups for both Falls Creek and Dearborn River on the AW website)

    This new issue probably sounds vaguely familiar...
    Last year about this time, we contacted the owners of the Lazy K Bar Ranch in MT's Crazy Mountains about permission to host the race on Big Timber Creek. We were immediately informed by the landowner that he was seriously considering closing access to Big T because of disrespectful kayakers speeding and cranking gangsta rap while cruising past his property. We worked diligently with Tack Van Cleve(Landowner) and have the situation currently well in hand(with your help, thanks) and are developing a very positive relationship that goes beyond simple access issues... but it was a close call indeed.
    I know that over 400 people have read the recent post about Big T on mountianbuzz, but humor me, for this is a very important point for everyone to understand. Especially for those of us who live here.

    Tack can shut down Big T. Period. There is no way to scout or portage the big drops without trespassing on his property and proving this to the local USFS would be a chip shot for him. Tack and the landowners on Sweetgrass Creek have communicated with each other on their respective issues with paddlers in the past, so it should be obvious that good relations with one will help maintain the other as well. Please keep up with the recent trend of being chill and respectful in that area.

    Falls Creek is currently fucked and the potential for this issue to bleed over into the Dearborn run is also very real.
    The initial reports are almost exactly the same as last year.
    Young dudes in fancy rigs being loud, disrespectful, and trespassing/speeding on private property.
    We have a very good idea who the landowners are referring to on both counts, but this isn't a witch hunt for the Silver Spoon Posse...
    Those who parked on private property at Falls Creek on creek right, hopped fences, and took shortcuts know who they are. I just want to let you know that you have took away a run many local Montana boaters enjoyed the hell out of paddling by being lazy and ignorant. And that, my friends, is some weak-assed sauce.
    If you have the cajones to trick off the fifty-footer on Falls Creek, you sure as shit have the energy to make the 500 yard hike up to scout it first, from the lower, established parking area and onto Forest Service(re:Public) land.

    We have a plan in place to establish contact with all parties(landowners) and to hopefully arrange a meeting to try and see if there is any way we can establish a protocol up there that will allow us a second chance on Falls Creek. With any luck at all, Tack Van Cleve may put a good word in for us... To be honest, it will be a longshot at best.

    In the end, Young Creek Boaters of America, y'all need to step up and recognize how the way you act around non-boaters and landowners can have a hugely negative effect on an enitre paddling community, not just on your little "gang" of all-star hucksta's. For the sake of the rest of the Montana creeking community I hope that those involved in these damaging events have the humility to recognize their shameful role in these back-to-back issues seriously enough to consider changing their ways when encountering such situations in the future....

    For those who have read this far. We would appreciate comments, opinions and ideas from folks in areas that have had similar issues with a few bad apples spoiling the bunch. Montana does not have enough sweet, accessible creeks to allow this to continue.
    Our process for Falls Creek access reclamation will be long... We will post our efforts and results as they happen.
    Thanks,
    Dave Schroeder and Jason Matthews
    Headwaters Paddling Association, MT

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sikskiyou's
    Posts
    1,602
    This is a good post. All too often, I find that many youngsters are devoid of access history knowledge - and even if they have good intentions, they can give relative long-time local paddlers a tarnished reputation.

    Keep talking to the landowners. Keep getting the word out to the young guns, as respectfully as possible. Respect breeds respect, for the most part. Be the bigger person/persons. Apologize for the ignorance of newer, less respectful boaters - and assure landowners that it is possible to get the access issues resolved.

    Good luck.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    O+Positive
    Posts
    3,175
    Preach it, Brother Blake!


    Agreed, very good post.
    Montani Semper Liberi

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Making the Bowl Great Again
    Posts
    13,817
    Bump.

    In addition to this great advice b y stonefly, who has played a HUGE part in securing access to the best creek in MT....

    Stonefly and I have already communicated about this, but if anyone is lurking in western MT, please try and take out immediately after the last slide on Kootenai Creek, instead of the normal takeout near the parking lot/trailhead.

    Hopefully this issue will be resolved quickly and amicably.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    882
    Hate to hear about this. We have a couple issues down here but nothing this bad. It seems that a lot of the land near rivers in the SE is owned by the USFS....I never realized how good we actually have it.

    Hope it works out - I've found out that respect for the locals (whether or not they have the same values as you) is the key. If you're going to go all out on the river do you really need to haul ass down the road to the trail/put-in? There are some rivers in NC where access is based solely on the relationship with a local.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sikskiyou's
    Posts
    1,602
    Quote Originally Posted by MarsB View Post
    Preach it, Brother Blake!
    Dramatic, I know. Quality whitewater access that was once golden, but now cloudy and tarnished, is an issue that I feel strongly about. Yes.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The great north
    Posts
    2,170
    I used to work for Tack and Carol. And yes, when people go blowing through the ranch at fifty miles an hour, or leave gates open, it is a pain the ass for all involved up there. The way the land is checkerboarded (thank you railroads) we will be fucked the moment he decides that it isn't worth the hassle. You may think that he can't shut down access to that area, i.e. being able to drive up, but, it could happen fairly easily. I know when working there, kayakers were usually pretty much taking the brunt of everything access related, but the shitty thing is it won't be paddlers that get it shut down, it will be other users and abusers.
    backcountry makes my wee wee tingle...
    "What was once a mighty river. Now a ghost." Edward Abbey
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    It's not wyoming...it's Jackson.
    Different rules apply.
    My Adventures

    "Feeling good is good enough."

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6

    Hey Skibuminwyo...

    Interesting post,
    Thought it would be relevant to post what happened to Tack this past fall after your words...
    Last fall, some "hunters" from Bozeman trespassed on Tack's land and started a wildfire that burned Tack's home to the ground, with all the history contained inside along with it.
    Tack's response to us regarding the race this year was very positive, including a date, and permission to host, etc... but between the possible logging up there this summer, the "adventure race" up there that would have overlapped with the Big T Race and the lack of time to put it together properly, we decided to leave her alone 'til next year. I will say that Tack certainly does have a lot of class and patience to not just stop any access he could up there after such a tragic event. I appreciate the feedback from everyone and hope that the younger boaters out there can understand that we don't want to alienate anyone, or stir up any us and them, your-turf/our-turf vibes within the paddling community. All we want is to maintain and create access and opportunity for all boaters in Montana on the maximum number of high quality streams. End of story.
    By putting all our petty and often ego-driven issues aside, we can quite easily solve all these access problems and hopefully put a new perspective on the sport that mirrors the late-great Conrad Anker's attitude towards climbing... "he who has the most fun, wins." (at leat that is who I have heard this quote attributed to...)
    Thanks all
    Dave

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Upper Left, USA
    Posts
    2,199
    Quote Originally Posted by stonefly View Post
    By putting all our petty and often ego-driven issues aside, we can quite easily solve all these access problems and hopefully put a new perspective on the sport that mirrors the late-great Conrad Anker's attitude towards climbing... "he who has the most fun, wins." (at leat that is who I have heard this quote attributed to...)
    Thanks all
    Dave
    Sorry to hear about the access issues up there. The youngin's are pretty bad when it comes to not thinking about how their actions affect people's perceptions of them.

    Just to clarify, Alex Lowe said that. Although I don't live in Bozeman anymore, I'm pretty sure Conrad's still alive.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    24,133
    Yes, Conrad is very much alive. In fact he had a letter in the Bozeman Chronic supporting Obama last week.

    Back to the subject.

    Keep up the great work, access issues these days are the key, whether you mountain bike, BC ski, climb or boat.

    It only takes 1 asshole to tarnish the rest of us. Good to see there are some willing to take the time to try and fix that.
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

Similar Threads

  1. ......You might live in Montana
    By FreakofSnow in forum The Padded Room
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-12-2006, 03:34 AM
  2. is this actually going to happen!?! (Wolf Creek Development)
    By wahama88 in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-20-2004, 03:34 PM
  3. wolf creek fighting back against developer
    By Crinkle in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-16-2004, 03:04 PM
  4. TR: Big mountain fishing in Montana
    By Zeedashbo in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-10-2004, 02:11 AM
  5. Sheep Creek Lake, hiking TR
    By FreakofSnow in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-05-2004, 08:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •