Last edited by ImSearchingforPowder; 03-14-2008 at 01:43 PM.
Wasn't 2001 just a few years ago or something like that?
Coolest thread since..... yesterday!
This is the best thread I've seen since the last one I looked at.
EDIT: Sorry AJ, didn't mean to steal your concept.
"Active management in bear markets tends to outperform. Unfortunately, investors are not as elated with relative returns when they are negative. But it does support the argument that active management adds value." -- independent fund analyst Peter Loach
[FONT="Arial Black"]GLOBAL COOLINGS!!!!![/FONT
![]()
2001 was seven years ago for the math impaired.
Globabl warming debate all started in 2006 so there you go global whining advocates
Bullshit. You lie.
Stay off my internet bitches.
paging David Witherspoon
Yeah, get that butthurt faggot in here. He's really been letting me down lately. Fucking fag.
Stay off my internet bitches.
Stay off my internet bitches.
Stay off my internet bitches.
Stay off my internet bitches.
Stay off my internet bitches.
Stay off my internet bitches.
Stay off my internet bitches.
Stay off my internet bitches.
That's irrelevant.
That debate ended up with legislation limiting/banning flouro-carbons, which has had a tremendous net benefit to airborne particulate and ozone depletion. There has been absolutely no downside to the positives borne by that debate.
Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident
i know you are a troll, but you fully missed the point.
Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident
Oh I got it denier. You tried to equate the Ozone threat to the start of my religion. Nice try, but everyone knows that GW started in the mid nineties, not when Time mag was bitching about the Ozone.
Stay off my internet bitches.
Uhhh...the scientific reports that al reviewed (re: Global Warming) in Congress were prepared in the early eighties. By scientists n' shit.
And obviously the Ozone layer depletion was/is a critical component of any climate model.
Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident
Bookmarks