Who knows for sure if different actions by a president could have caught OBL, or more precisely the 9-11 hijackers? We can all speculate, but it's just that.
OK, now with ^^^ that said; It has been confirmed that before the 2000 New Year there was increased terrorist type "chatter" from our monitoring sources. Clinton was involved in raising the level of observation and monitoring in all our security services. They had an emergency meeting/conference of those services and had the word sent out to every level right down to the shoes on the street, to be on our toes and keep a keen eye out for anything suspiscious. An observent border guard (in Washington state I believe) ended up catching someone smuggling explosives across the border for an attack.
Now with Bush in office, when a similar increase in "chatter" occured... He did nothing. He initiated nothing new/special as Clinton had... Hell, he did the opposite, he took his stupid ass down to Texas for a month long vacation. Also, remember Condoleeze Rice having to admit one of the daily briefings titles??? OBL/Al Quaida determined to strike inside the United States!!! There were signs there. Again, I can't say that if Bush had helped make sure the level of our observation was raised as Clintion had, that we would have caught them... But at least he could have done something???
If some of the best times of my life were skiing the UP in -40 wind chill with nothing but jeans, cotton long johns and a wine flask to keep warm while sleeping in the back of my dad's van... does that make me old school?
"REHAB SAVAGE, REHAB!!!"
Bookmarks