Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Duke and alpine boots for touring ...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Utrecht, NL
    Posts
    121

    Duke and alpine boots for touring ...

    I want to use Duke for outbounds and non-lift served primarily. Good idea? I know it is too bomber and heavy for long tours but I want some bomber stuff. Boots used will be some Lange Banshee 110. Not that stiff. I can withstand all day in them so no problem for me to use alpine boots for hiking / touring instead of proper AT rig. Is it total nonsense to think that i wound be possible to hike 5000ft vertical on Bros / Goats with Dukes and in Lange alpines which fit my feet well and are comfy? sorry for fu@king jong but I want to know who is touring in alpine boots XY thousand ft and is ok with them.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ventura Highway in the Sunshine
    Posts
    22,445
    Sure you can do it, but if you are going to climb 5,000ft get something lighter. You can also drag a boat anchor uphill, but why?

    If you you were just doing some slack country, then no problem, but that sound like a pretty long tour in alpine boots.

    I agree it is a constitutional right for Americans to be assholes...its just too bad that so many take the opportunity...
    iscariot

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    sure, you absolutely can. but do you want to?

    i personally don't mind a setup like that, but that does not mean you will.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Carson Range
    Posts
    379
    As stated above, of course it is possible. I know folks that climb cascade volcanoes in Freerides and Alpine boots. Have seen people doing long tours with trekkers even.

    But most folks that get serious about this upgrade to lighter gear. Especially true with the new generation of 4 buckle/stiffer AT boots.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    293
    a few times i've been on my heavy rig (goats, lange130wc, FR+) and a quick jaunt into the resort sidecountry has turned into a 5000ft day cause the snow was worth staying out of bounds and touring...but I wouldn't wanna give up my dynafits for backcountry specific days.

    if you're really fit and/or don't mind the weight, then no problemo...but if your primary reason for wanting heavy gear is so that it is bomber, dynafits are more than capable bindings for just about any backcountry skiing and it'll save you tons of weight.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sunriver, Orygun
    Posts
    529
    I use my Kryptons all the time.
    I've always used my alpine boot w/ AT unless there's lotsa rock and scrambling.
    There are times I wish it was lighter but I'm a phatazz.
    Shasta from 14K it was worth the weight.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    Quote Originally Posted by Bud View Post
    dynafits are more than capable bindings for just about any backcountry skiing and it'll save you tons of weight.
    this is GROSSLY over-generalized.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Skiattle
    Posts
    7,750
    ^
    as someone who drinks the dynafit koolaid, I agree

    dynafits are not for everyone

    which is fine by me cause I, "Do want MOAR!!"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    691
    People can tell you this setup or that setup, but it completely depends on your style. I have skied cascade volcanos - 8000+ vert in alpine boots with trekkers, because I didnt' have the money to afford more than one setup. It sucked, but I made do. Now I have dukes on gots and dynafits on lotus 120's. I never tour on the gots. They are too heavy, I don't huck much and normally tone things down a bit in the backcountry. If you are a big person and or huck dukes are probably what you want, but if you are the average bc skier out for pow turns a lighter set up is the way to go, in my opinion.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    171
    What about you try it and then decide?
    For me it's akin to doing all-day epic Mtb rides on a 45lbs, 8" travel DH rig while wearing full body armor and fullface. Some people are up to it condition-wise and others are required to have such burly gear due to their agression level and/or skills.
    The most important thing is to assess yourself honestly and decide if you fall in one or the other category.
    Perhaps a 30lbs 6" AM rig is better suited to what you want to do...I'll let you find out what the skiing equivalent is...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Squamish BC.
    Posts
    711
    My back country rig consists of G3 Reverends, light but at the heavier end of the scale for serious touring, about 188 Bro weight or even a little more. They are mounted with 05/06 white Freerides and I have just switched from Garmount Adrenalines to Endorphines. I found the Adrenallines heavy by touring standards and the Endorphines are even heavier, but much lighter than most any Alpine boot. I would consider my gear heavy, and it would be way lighter than your setup. It is Ok to do big day tours on and even have done some overnighters, but would not want to do long tours on anything heavier. The rig you describe sounds great for resort back country though. I have Gotamas mounted with the Freeride Plus for side country and have considered mounting Dukes on them. I prefer to use the Endorphines if I am considering any skining, because the walk mode makes quite a difference to me.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    191
    i know its a pretty broad question cause 5,000 ft can mean different steepness and conditions etc.

    but whats the average it would take someone to climb 5,000 ft.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    C-Town
    Posts
    5,541
    I came off trekkers so touring with my dukes feels like heaven.
    Quote Originally Posted by twodogs View Post
    Hey Phill, why don't you post your tax returns, here on TGR, asshole. And your birth certificate.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3
    i know its a pretty broad question cause 5,000 ft can mean different steepness and conditions etc.

    but whats the average it would take someone to climb 5,000 ft.
    Personally, with the dukes on a heavy ski and moving at a comfortable pace, i'm usually about 1000 vert. in 50 minutes. Very subjective. So many variables. Just go for it.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    T-town, CO. USA
    Posts
    2,098
    Quote Originally Posted by bigpetey05 View Post
    i know its a pretty broad question cause 5,000 ft can mean different steepness and conditions etc.

    but whats the average it would take someone to climb 5,000 ft.
    First of all, there are very few places in North America that you could actually ski tour 5,000 ft of vertical. Time variables include; weather, snow conditions, speed of the slowest skinner, etc,...
    I have done a 4,000 ft. tour in as little as 2.5 hrs. That same tour in different conditions has also taken me 4+ hrs.
    Leave No Turn Unstoned!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,935
    Quote Originally Posted by DropCliffsNotBombs View Post
    First of all, there are very few places in North America that you could actually ski tour 5,000 ft of vertical.
    Bullshit on so many levels it's difficult to know where to start.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sawtooth's
    Posts
    1,336
    I did 4500 feet yesterday with Dukes, Gotama's with Tecnica's. I have blisters on both of my heels but that is another story. I have Dynafit's but I wanted to get some time on my Dukes and see how I felt after a day. I think you could do 5000 vert with out to much problem.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    8,467
    I skinned a few hundred sidecountry vert today in Atomic RT 150's and Dukes on Bluehouse Districts. It was my first skin on the Dukes and all worked fine. One note (anyone else notice this?) was that I noticed that since the Duke in tour mode moves the binding backwards a little bit, it was a little more difficult to get the tip up and around when doing a switchback turn. It should be noted however that I am a gaper, especially on skins, and this issue is likely entirely dependent upon mounting point.

Similar Threads

  1. Duke as alpine binder confessions.
    By BradyCU in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-19-2008, 10:18 PM
  2. Katana And Duke early review
    By deeppo in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-13-2007, 07:20 PM
  3. Dynafit FR Aero and Marker Duke Review
    By laseranimal in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-16-2007, 09:29 PM
  4. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-13-2007, 01:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •