Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Legend Pros vs current quiver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352

    Legend Pros vs current quiver

    I'm faced with a decision....

    Sell the current quiver:
    176 Scratch BCs w/ look p14 maxplates
    170 Bandit XXs w/ noname rossis
    +$$$

    and buy 186 Legend Pros for next season?

    Unanimous answer will prolly be: YES. I figured as much. But will it be worth the extra $$ I would have to throw in to it?

    -John

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Nhampshire
    Posts
    7,873
    I don't know, have you skied them? How do you like your current quiver? It really depends.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    Have not skied the legend pros. I have skied xploders, g4s, etc. and based on reviews it seems that this comes from the burlier breed of skis, which i like
    Current quiver is :-/. I like the scratches but am utterly, completely sick of rossignol durability. Also, the scratches i am on are too short and do not provide enough float to really mach in pow... I skied the bandits for a total of 2 days this year on pure hardpack/ice days and from what I've heard the legend pros should have better edge grip neways.... bandits are not an issue really

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Under the bridge, down by the river
    Posts
    4,881
    Seldon, where are you skiing now?

    Ive skied with tons of folks at Sugarbush and MRG on the Legend Pros(the entire town of waitsfield owns them) and they all say they rock for east coast tree bashing.

    But if you are out east you might want to save the XXs or have something else so you wont destroy the legends so quickly, and to use when the snow is less than epic.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Sound
    Posts
    674
    i skied a 186 Legend Pro demo, a normally ski a 195 rossi sidewall blowing XXX. Did not like the 186, but next year they come out in a 194, that might turn me on.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    I'm based in San Francisco and ski mostly kirkweed and alta (my breaks). I'd love to have a pair of "rock skis" but at this point I don't think I can afford "rock skis" as well as a pair of good skis... Otherwise I'd keep the XXs for those early days...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Under the bridge, down by the river
    Posts
    4,881
    I'd say consolidate to the Legends then, and wait until mtnlion has some cheapo fatties to pick up.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    none
    Posts
    8,896
    Originally posted by seldon
    I'd love to have a pair of "rock skis" but at this point I don't think I can afford "rock skis" as well as a pair of good skis...
    I don't care were you ski, you almost always have to have a pair of rock boards to start the season. If you don't the legends would become them pretty quick.

    I skied the Pro's last weekend at Snowbird and they are a great ski. But they weren't that great early, but it was fkn hard! Later after it softened they carved all types of turns and were still stable at speed.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    das heights
    Posts
    2,542
    i rode the 194 lp's all year... it is alot of ski, no shit
    i would have liked the 186 so i coulda been a little more versatile- skiing trees (ec) was really really challenging on the 194's

    other then that they rock.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Slut Lake City
    Posts
    7,785
    Originally posted by pointedem
    i rode the 194 lp's all year... it is alot of ski, no shit
    i would have liked the 186 so i coulda been a little more versatile- skiing trees (ec) was really really challenging on the 194's

    other then that they rock.
    Would the 186's really be that much more versatile at 8cm's shorter but 6mm wider?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    4,334
    Well, if you look at Example A - Legend Pros, and Example B - Pocket Rockets, you'll see that the Blue Noodles have been designed with thinner tips and tails, which greatly reduces the swing weight. The LPs, on the other hand, don't really give a shit about swing weight, because #1 - you shouldn't be skiing them on the east coast, and #2 - they'll choke a robot bitch out like Wayne Brady.

    8cms of length is a ton different than 7 mm of waist difference, IMO, especially with swing weight in trees and whatnot.
    OOOOOOOHHHH, I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    416
    i think if you're sick of a shorts piece of shit rossi the dynastar is your ski. 186 would be fine in the trees and those things are fucking bomber. screw rossi.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    verbier, milan, isla de pascua
    Posts
    4,806
    wouldn't you like to demo karmas before buying legends? be patient. I made a mistake last year when I bought B2..... without demoing B3

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    Originally posted by verbier61
    wouldn't you like to demo karmas before buying legends? be patient. I made a mistake last year when I bought B2..... without demoing B3
    The Karmas are volkls, and narrower.... Too narrow (thinner than my scratches). I'm probably going to wait to buy the Legends until I get a chance to demo them at the beginning of next season anyways....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •