On friday, ptavv, ski_pdx, and myself headed up to Mt Hood to scratch our way around the 1" of fresh and grind on the underlying chalk and dust on runnel playground that is Mt Hood Meadows currently. We recently experienced a wet warm front that douched the unstable snowpack, which has since refrozen into a nice stable base. 3-4" inches have fallen since then.
After 2.5 hours of high speed groomer carving and sampling the number bowls for soft spots, we noticed some relatively unmolested 3-4" of fresh snow on the east faces of the ridge between the Cascade liftline and Ridge Run (low angle groomer). This short 100 ft face begins at the edge of the groomer, and if bootpacked will gain you about 150 vertical feet max if followed to the top. It was untracked, and a very obvious target of adventurous extreme skiers, of which we were apparently the only ones on the mountain friday.
We hiked it, skied it, collected at the bottom, at which point a patroller approached us on a snowmobile and asked to see our passes inbetween fuming grunts, claiming we were out of bounds and in danger of being too close to control work. He only had to ride 300 feet laterally and downhill from the new patrol shack at the top of Mt Hood Express to reach us, and crossed a groomer full of beginning snowboarders to do it. If they're bombing that close to an open groomer, then I concede the point.
I don't recall his word verbatim, but the jist of the exchange was that he claimed we were skiing out of bounds on basis of an implied closure (my term, since he could not articulate the complex reasoning regarding why unmarked terrain next to a groomer is closed), based on the fact that the lift that serves that terrain is not open. He also claimed that we ignored "no hiking" signs posted on the Mt Hood Express lift. There were no ropes, no closed sign, I assume because it's terrain that is normally open and a heavily trafficked when Cascade is running. This is my account, based on what I could get out of him by asking 20 questions while he studiously wrote our names down in his notebook, confirming the police-like mentality and self-image that many patrollers have. Punish first, inform if there's time before your buddies call on the radio about lunch. I do enjoy talking to a cool patroller, but they tend to be older guys.
After dancing with his ego for a few minutes to "clarify" our violation he bid us bon boyage and we skied to the lodge under a cloud of buzzkill.
Yesterday, after looking unsuccessfully everywhere for a "no hiking" sign, I cornered a patroller to ask him about the policy, and run by him what the other patroller had told me.
"Yeah...it's more actually the spirit of the law rather than the letter of the law, and you know, i miss signs all the time driving around town....patrollers are just ansy this early in the season." Airtight.
He could not answer me regarding the "No Hiking" sign so I assume it was written on a dry erase board somewhere for contextual application when Cascade is not open.
I really can't argue with the implied closure policy, we were wrong to ever consider bootpacking 150 ft straight up off of an unsigned, unroped groomer to proudly ski 5 turns of fresh in plain view of the patrol shack. Now we know.
Insert Fensler Film GI Joe character Alpine saying some weird shit.
Bitch.Moan. I'm a computaaahh.
Funny lame photos:
I need to start wearing clothes that enhance my figure rather than ones that make me look like a doughboy.
Carve Party Criminals.
The Big Poach:
Red pants are all the rage in rural Oregon.
I kinda wish I was still here, paddling with my lady.
![]()
Bookmarks