Can both lick my nutsack.
That is all, please continue.
Printable View
Can both lick my nutsack.
That is all, please continue.
I never met Mill, but Waldron was less than inspiring.
I'm impressed with your decisiveness on this issue.
I was expecting a "WWMD: Should John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Waldon lick my nutsack?" thread.
Killing me right now. Why I ever signed up for a course entitled "Ideas of the First Amendment" is beyond me.Quote:
Originally Posted by MakersTeleMark
Your prof. is a stud. And a decent philosopher as they go. Too bad he is regarded as a liberal and a legal positivist.:eek:
I am assuming he is your prof...
Immanual Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
Who could think you under the table
David Hume could out consume
Schopenhauer and Hegel
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel
There's nothing Nietzche couldn't teach ya
'Bout the raising of the wrist
Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed
John Stuart Mill, of his own free will
On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill
Plato they say, could stick it away
Half a crate of whiskey every day
Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle
Hobbes was fond of his dram
And Rene' Descartes was a drunken fart
"I drink, therefore I am"
Yes, Socrates, himself, is particularly missed
A lovely little thinker
But a bugger when he's pissed
Unfortunately, it sounds like Waldron wouldn't be into licking your nutsack.
Quote:
"It is a matter of some shame that we now have to devote lectures to torture, not as something of historical interest but as a matter of topical concern," Waldron, who is University Professor of Law and director of the Center for Law and Philosophy at Columbia University, said. "The U.S. is now widely regarded in the world as a torture state."
Heh, heh. Funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pope Benedict XVI
Maybe some should clue Rontele's girlfriend in. Looks like she has been subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pope Benedict XVI
Ha, Waldron is most definitely not my professor. I am taught First Amendment by some second tier scholar, who hikes his pants, refuses to wear belts, is condescending as fuck, and farts in front of Einer Elhauge, then blames it on a student.
He too can lick my nutsack for requiring me to write an eight page paper on how I can explain the Court's decision in Hill v. Colorado by looking at Mill and Waldron's views of moral distress and harm.
So I guess Jeremy Bentham can work the old taint while the other two handle the sack?
I am decisive that you are a cocksucker.Quote:
Originally Posted by cj001f
Such a romantic! :fm:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rontele
He's just exercising free will, or maybe some free willy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rontele
Quote:
Originally Posted by irul&ublo
That is exactly what I thought of.
I'm writing a final on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason right now. Anyone have any Beta?
Yeah, just write that Kant started with a conclusion, thereafter created a premise and that he was a dirty dirty kraut.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fellin34
Easy. To explain in 8 sentences, that is...Quote:
Originally Posted by Rontele
Didn't deal with free speech, but not being approached by speechifiers. Peeps have a right to be left alone. When they are not, they are harmed.
Plus 5 more sentences. Good luck!
This is straight out of the Phishshow Handbook for Excelling in Your Studies.
jokes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by commonlaw
A dirty dirty Kraut indeed. This Critique of Pure Reason is unreadable! I'm still writing this paper about how synthetic a priori knowledge is possible and i'm pulling my hair out.
Truth is spoken as every Easter thousands of Peeps get harmed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tye 1on
Just go shoot up some morpheme.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fellin34
Ooo, i don't know p0d3er, i kinda like this idea.:tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster Highmen
wow, one week, several all nighters, and tons of caffine pills later, i finished a final paper on Kant. I wish i could say i understand everything i wrote, but, i'm not sure kant knew what he was writing all the time either.
Time for the Morphene, cuz skoooooolzzzz out fo summer! I've got bro's and naxos waiting at home, i'll be skiing soon!
you gotta give it up to Mill for trumping liberty over the state, but his so-called "harm principle" is one of the most bludgeoned and abused pieces of philosophy to emerge from his day. If only he had expanded that a touch instead of being so vague. Nowadays, anyone who smells a stogie, reads a bad word, sees a naked lady or endures a verbal lashing says they're "harmed."
Minus points for his oatmeal-dude haircut tho. whazzupwidat?