alpine skiing abuses your knees more than telemark
Am I right or am I correct? * Think about how forces are absorbed and distributed through various joints from the balls of your feet northward. Anybody with sufficient experience with both can attest to this. Sure, telemark is stupid, no one cares that you tele etc. etc (spare us all the trite clichees) Not a question of leather vs plastic or 75mm vs NTN or anything other than what's tougher on the knees.
*or am I totally fucking wrong and if so why the fuck? thanks in advance
wtf do i know? not much but have skied 6 decades alpine, half that time tele on and off
alpine skiing abuses your knees more than telemark
I think all of us who can understand injury and/or aging care about being able to continue skiing as we get older. Bindings didn't have DIN standards when I started. The gear is safer but the very nature of the sport can wear down knee joints. I'll get a replacement knee eventually.
First time I quit tele was 15 years ago after lower femur crumpling, the cause of present day pain. I dabbled again last season with ill fitting T1s (I'll get them dialed in soon) Perhaps smoother movement, slowing down a bit, using other flex points, mixing up the turns will alleviate some knee pain and shift soreness elsewhere.
An idiot ortho doc looked at my crumpled femur X-ray 15 years ago and had the cluelessness to say “you may not be able to ski anymore”. I uncharacteristically bit my tongue and didn’t tell him what an a hole he was. If I lost a leg I would continue to ski. in retrospect, I should’ve given him a mini lecture on lifelong sports, adaptive skiing, and maybe listening to the patient but I’m sure his time was precious and my anger substantial. It wasn’t my first skiing related injury, and it might not be the last. The pain is going to be there regardless so I’ll keep skiing.
alpine skiing abuses your knees more than telemark
Quote:
Originally Posted by
parkmeister
since i have nothing of value to add to this topic, i just came here to say that this thread has the perfect combination of:
1. genuine and knowledgeable enthusiasts sharing their personal observations.
2. earnest and informative responses from a physiological perperspective.
3. a ton of lighthearted and self-effacing humor.
4. and no antagonistic, hostile, or uncivil bs.
happy new year, mags. may ullr smile upon us all.
https://youtu.be/g5DIqwh9EiU?si=ogBa8fY0UyLJbueP
Gosh, uhm. Thanks. May Ullr smile upon us all and may we all ski as much as we really want to as long as we can.
To be honest I started this hoping for a fight with clueless people hell bent on blathering about which they know little. I was looking for a fight because I was feeling ornery. I guess I should be glad that we’ll reasoned discourse followed. Thanks all for sharing your thoughts and insights.
So glad I was part of the ttips exodus back in the day twentiyish years ago. Good place to land. Have met and skied with a bunch of really good people from here. Catch you EC cats somewhere this winter
alpine skiing abuses your knees more than telemark
Have been doing both this season and my research with a sample of one confirms the theory. Obviously serious strength and youthful vigor make any skiing easier, sadly lacking both here. I prefer ice with a fixed heel but there’s something smoother and less jarring about the extended suspension you have with tele. When one makes alpine turns with tele gear the transmission of forces is about the same but my T-ones are softer than Hawx 130. Have wondered about softer boots as a way to reduce knee abuse but I think all my skis (and my brain) are fine with stiff alpine boots.