Heritage Lab BC90

I didn’t see a thread for this ski from HLS. With a little time on these now I’ve got some feedback. I mounted these with Xenics w/ the tallest B&D shim at 82 cm from the tail for a 320 bsl. I aggressively detuned the splayed/tapered part of the edges with a file and ran a gummy the length of the sidecut.

They are really intuitive and very smooth in variable conditions. 2-4” of graupel and snow over a roughly textured very hard crust they handled with ease. Wind scoured spots on the same crust were fine, no catchiness and they smoothed out the ride pretty well for a ski this light. Corn and over ripe corn/slush was a dream so smooth and surfy with a neutral stance or rail turns with higher edge angles and cross under turns, not really driving the cuffs but through the arch with a fully flexed compact stance. Super fun. I think these will be pretty good in wind affected new snow, there’s no catching at all with the deep low rocker.

Skinning is fine with full width skins. On really firm snow a ski crampon will mitigate any slipping due to the full rocker.

They are pretty forgiving if you stay on the sweet spot. The caveat is that the sweet spot is pretty small. This could be the length combined with the full rocker and my size, 6’4” 240.

These are going to be great for late winter and spring tours with the possibility of powder, crust, corn etc.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

I am very BC90 curious. I have almost pulled the trigger on this ski a few times now, but with my injury I thought it was best to wait till I knew I would get good use out of it. I will 100% buy a pair before next fall.

I see this as the perfect early season/no snow in 7+ days/spring season Colorado/Utah touring ski. I live in SW CO and we see all sorts of fucked up punchy crusts, wind affected snow, ect... For those longer missions and days where I know I will see a wide variety of conditions this ticks all my boxes. I am 6' 175lbs and usually like progressively skis in the mid 180s+ but am thinking of going with the 177cm version of the BC90. I do not expect to ski this fast and hard, outside of perfect corn so going a bit shorter to save weight/skin track compliance/ease of use makes sense in my head.

My biggest worry with this ski is performance in tight chutes and steeper lines where a bit of camber and a stiff supportive tail are nice. We do not get to ski those kind of lines around here till spring usually, so I will have a lot of time to play around and see if this would be a ski I trust in those conditions.

I think the 177 would be fine for you, the 184 would work if you wanted more beef. The flex is very similar to the Raven, it’s not a noodle and the dampness will surprise you.

They’re fun noodling around but if you open them up they get even better, very much like a skinny Raven if you’re into that


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

i am actually captivated by the concept/specs,such a cool and daring idea to try to combine "fun" elements into such a narrow ski while retaining some sort of balanced weight (not too light, not too heavy).

MagnificentUnicorn, do you have any pictures of them/in action/out there "in the field"? so f'in curious.

Where are they mounted? what boots are you using them with?

Sweet! Baby gets it's own thread!

Fun fact; when we drew these, they were supposed to be baby FL113s for early and late season touring.

Imho, they deliver. Shape just works. I'm kinda sorry i never skied the Völkl BMT 94s, but pretty stoked on these on their own merit.

My fat ass skis the 184 on the line. Love them!


Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

When you say on the line, what do you mean? I’m at 82 from the tail so -10cm from ski center. I’m not sure that I would go more forward with my BSL and size. Skiing with a Roxa R3 TI. I would like to get some RX Tours and try those.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Timely thread, finally got out on mine last weekend in a few inches of dust on crust with the occasional deeper turn. Took the BMT94s out later to compare.

They feel different from the BMT94s but have that same easy to release feeling. I like how they manage to be a little lighter but still don't feel chattery or get knocked around, perfect weight. They never got hung up in the crusty snow underneath and floated remarkably well in deeper pockets.

Skinning was pretty easy despite the rocker (much easier than on my C132s). I got some ski trab skins with the tip rip attachments for these and I'm loving them.

I worry that I may have mounted them a little too far back, it feels like a ton of ski out front compared with the BMT. This was a recommended mount point from one of marshals mailings but it looks like the rec line got moved forward at some point?

I definitely need more time to decide if I like them as much or better than the BMTs. They are similar but still have a really different character. Hoping for a lot of spring skiing on them in the coming weeks in the Sierra.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

How far from the tail is your midsole?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fleaches

Timely thread, finally got out on mine last weekend in a few inches of dust on crust with the occasional deeper turn. Took the BMT94s out later to compare.

They feel different from the BMT94s but have that same easy to release feeling. I like how they manage to be a little lighter but still don't feel chattery or get knocked around, perfect weight. They never got hung up in the crusty snow underneath and floated remarkably well in deeper pockets.

Skinning was pretty easy despite the rocker (much easier than on my C132s). I got some ski trab skins with the tip rip attachments for these and I'm loving them.

I worry that I may have mounted them a little too far back, it feels like a ton of ski out front compared with the BMT. This was a recommended mount point from one of marshals mailings but it looks like the rec line got moved forward at some point?

I definitely need more time to decide if I like them as much or better than the BMTs. They are similar but still have a really different character. Hoping for a lot of spring skiing on them in the coming weeks in the Sierra.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

---

How would you describe the differences in character? I got a pair of well-used BMT94s this season and am liking them so far for touring in funky conditions. I was considering the BC90 as a likely replacement if I ever needed down the road, so curious to hear the comparison.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn

How far from the tail is your midsole?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

79.5 on the 184

Based on the current mount chart on the website I should probably be +2 cm forward

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fleaches

79.5 on the 184

Based on the current mount chart on the website I should probably be +2 cm forward

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

---

Yeah, I went 82 on the 184. An inch more aft would be no bueno. The sweet spot is pretty small. I’d remount. What’s your bsl?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn

Yeah, I went 82 on the 184. An inch more aft would be no bueno. The sweet spot is pretty small. I’d remount. What’s your bsl?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

Shortish bsl too at 300, which I think usually means go forward even more.

Yeah may have to remount. It still skis pretty well but just feels too far back. I might be able to reuse some holes.

If Marshal sees this I'm curious to hear his thoughts too

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

Great convo on mount position. I am curious to hear boot/binding setups with mount too, as there can be a way bigger range on that stuff on touring gear vs alpine.

I recently went from 18* forward lean touring boots to 12* boots and ended up needing to go +2 on my mount as a result.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshal Olson

Great convo on mount position. I am curious to hear boot/binding setups with mount too, as there can be a way bigger range on that stuff on touring gear vs alpine.

I recently went from 18* forward lean touring boots to 12* boots and ended up needing to go +2 on my mount as a result.

---

This is zero g peaks for boots and atk haute routes for what it's worth.

I ski the BMTs with the same boots but they are mounted with alpinists (I believe these are your old BMTs)

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

word, that's right!

I believe that midsole on the BMT94 is -11cm from straight tape center of the ski. I believe that you are around -12.5cm on the BC90 right now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn

When you say on the line, what do you mean? I’m at 82 from the tail so -10cm from ski center. I’m not sure that I would go more forward with my BSL and size. Skiing with a Roxa R3 TI. I would like to get some RX Tours and try those.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

Oh, same as you. -10 is pretty much the designed zero. Had a hell of a time tuning in the backland XTDs, but ended up sticking them at the most upright and turned out great. Atk FR14s with the factory toe shim,btw. 307 bsl.

Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshal Olson

word, that's right!

I believe that midsole on the BMT94 is -11cm from straight tape center of the ski. I believe that you are around -12.5cm on the BC90 right now.

---

Thanks, I'll try moving the mount forward 1.5-2cm and see how that feels. I like where the BMTs are that feels really balanced for my style.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 3pin

How would you describe the differences in character? I got a pair of well-used BMT94s this season and am liking them so far for touring in funky conditions. I was considering the BC90 as a likely replacement if I ever needed down the road, so curious to hear the comparison.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

Some of it may be due to having the mount a little too far back. One thing I like about the BMT94 is that you can ski it from the tips or kind of noodle it around right under foot, the BC90 doesn't quite have that feeling but I think that will change if I remount it.

The other difference is in the rocker. BC90 came out with a pretty gradual rocker but it's much more pronounced than the perfectly flat BMT94 and it feels more like a rocked ski. Not that it's unbalanced or anything, just kind of like less of the ski is engaged or something? On the BMT I feel like I don't notice that it is flat/reverse except that it is super easy to turn and throw sideways.

They are both easy and loose (like the opposite of a 0g 95). Need to get some more time on the BC90 though to really nail down the differences.

^I think if you move forward 2cm you’ll feel the difference


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

These skis make terrible snow tolerable. So easy in shit snow. I skinned up through the ski area today to get some higher elevation corn in adjacent backcountry. They’re great and really predictable in wild crust and slay corn. Skiing back through the ski area was older groomers from the weekend that had been skied out when slushy, think refrozen sastrugi. Pivot, pivot, pivot.

I forgot to mention, I bought some Pomoca Climb Pro S skins for these. Mohair/nylon. The grip and glide is incredible. No issues skinning on hard surfaces, even convex areas. I had been a little concerned that I’d have to use ski crampons more than I would like to but it’s not an issue


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

makes sense to use the (light blue right?) climb pro S with these since i think they're the grippiest ones (i also own and use climb 2.0s regularly). I used them a lot with my old heavy bent120 back when i ran touring bindings with those skis and they did help me a lot on shitty Alps skintracks.

i've been praising and enjoying heavily rockered skis (albeit with camber) with moderate tip profiles on all kinds of shitty snow for years, i am so stoked on these skis. Just to daydream a bit, what size shoud i be looking at? i'm 5'11, 150ish pounds, i live and die by forward mounts in the BC (approx. 3 to 5 cm from true center is my sweetspot but it depends of course), hawx ultra xtd 130.

Definitely the 177. Curiosity got the better of me and I moved the bindings to -8. I’ll report back tomorrow on how it changes the feel. I ski my Renegades and Ravens at -8 and love them there. It on the extreme end of Hoji’s recommendation but I’m tall and heavier.

I ski pretty neutral and upright mostly. The 90s have a bias toward tip stiffness and at my size I feel the tail is a tad short and less supportive and I like more support in deeper corn especially when wearing a pack.

Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn

Definitely the 177. Curiosity got the better of me and I moved the bindings to -8. I’ll report back tomorrow on how it changes the feel. I ski my Renegades and Ravens at -8 and love them there. It on the extreme end of Hoji’s recommendation but I’m tall and heavier.

I ski pretty neutral and upright mostly. The 90s have a bias toward tip stiffness and at my size I feel the tail is a tad short and less supportive and I like more support in deeper corn especially when wearing a pack.

Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

Curious to hear your thoughts on the -8 mount point. I was leaning towards going -10-9.5 on the 177cms, but I bet the 184s might be money for me at -8

Yes please report back, going to remount mine this week and need to make a decision

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

-8 is the sweet spot for me, fixed the things I wished were different. Dead easy to stand in a neutral stance and carve or pivot now. At -10 I had to consciously change my stance to pivot in a neutral stance or get forward to carve. The extra tail is nice. I wouldn’t hesitate to experiment with a more progressive mount on these, I think-6 to -8 would be fine if you want a more progressive feel.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

ok wow, very interesting data!

I personally couldn't mount the BC90 more forward than -10. And -10.5 (with my new boots) is my happy place.

But as your testing points out, lots of different stances and riding styles!

VERY COOL MAN. thanks for giving this a go

I decided to give it a go after talking with Kai. He said that given the difference in how we ski that I should give it a go. I’m really happy with the change. I liked them a lot at -10 but they disappeared under foot at -8.

I think the front 2/3 of the ski being pretty stiff relative to the tail allows a more forward mount. The low continuous rocker helps too, if they had a flat section around the designed mount location I don’t think they’d be as forgiving of a more forward mount.

Great ski for wild snow of all types but deep unconsolidated snow.

Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

OK so remounted this week and it's a totally different ski. I reused the front toe holes, which moved everything forward 2.7 cm

Way easier skiing, way more centered. Hit some corn, slop, crust, and crud in various places on the way down and everything felt easy. Possibly even easier than the BMT94, but noticeably lighter. Can still feel that they are more reverse than the BMTs (which are flat flat flat) but I'm not saying that's a bad thing, it makes a really quick pivot or a partial jump turn super easy. Great spring ski. Hoping to take them for a few days in the eastern sierra in a week or so.



Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...b492c5db28.jpg

Dude! Sweet!

I am so glad. So it sounds like you are about -9.5 to -10 on the ski then. Sounds like I should update the mounts on the next batch based on this info.

Also. How do you post pics on these interwebz? It is totally gone and no longer an option for me. Am I stupid?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshal Olson

Dude! Sweet!

I am so glad. So it sounds like you are about -9.5 to -10 on the ski then. Sounds like I should update the mounts on the next batch based on this info.

Also. How do you post pics on these interwebz? It is totally gone and no longer an option for me. Am I stupid?

---

I use tapatalk.

Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

Yeah loving them now, just feel dumb I mounted them so far back initially.

And yeah seems like you can still post pics on tapatalk, but it has become pretty abominable to use in the last few weeks... really slow loading and making you sit though ads that can't be closed. So can't say I recommend using it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshal Olson

Dude! Sweet!

I am so glad. So it sounds like you are about -9.5 to -10 on the ski then. Sounds like I should update the mounts on the next batch based on this info.

Also. How do you post pics on these interwebz? It is totally gone and no longer an option for me. Am I stupid?

---

Anyone wants to shift a pair with a set of holes in PM me. 184 preferred.

These continue to impress, they’re so predictable in weird snow. Just a really good choice for an all conditions touring ski. I wouldn’t worry about them in steeper terrain, skied some graupel and new snow over very firm crust today. Sections were 40+ degrees and I never felt like they were lacking in edge hold


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Yeah man! Loving the feedback, thanks for keeping it up to date.

I am really loving my pair to the same degree!

Big May dump in Tahoe this weekend and these were the only skis I had with me and they were really floaty for a 90 mm ski. Like obviously you'll sink if you're skiing low angle blower, but if you can get them going a little bit they are super fun in pow

I kept getting comments from people about how skinny my skis were but I don't feel like I missed out at all by not having something fatter. Attachment 493177Attachment 493178

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fleaches

Big May dump in Tahoe this weekend and these were the only skis I had with me and they were really floaty for a 90 mm ski. Like obviously you'll sink if you're skiing low angle blower, but if you can get them going a little bit they are super fun in pow

I kept getting comments from people about how skinny my skis were but I don't feel like I missed out at all by not having something fatter. Attachment 493177Attachment 493178

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

---

Nice turns, brother. I think these skis punch way above their width. I mean, they're still 90mm waist, perhaps more importantly, 113mm tip, but they float and turn oh so nice in 5-10" of fluff.

Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

BC90 (unskied) in outlet with voyager bindings is a fucking deal if anyone is looking.

What do you BC90 guys think of them for firm steep stuff? Adequate edge hold for scary skiing?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

So far they’ve been fine, nothing super steep but around 40 degrees refrozen corn. Never felt like I’d lose an edge.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by riff

What do you BC90 guys think of them for firm steep stuff? Adequate edge hold for scary skiing?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

If you're good with BMT94s on steep stuff these should behave similarly. I also haven't been on anything really steep and hard with them, but could imagine a time when you'd want more sidecut. These jump turn like a dream though.




Took these on an eastern sierra trip last weekend with tgapp and had an excellent time, perfect ski for the conditions. We had pretty decent corn with the occasional unconsolidated aspect that was heavy and grabby. These skis strike a great balance for weight, easy to carry on long approaches but powers through the heavy snow.

The only issue I discovered was that they are a little slippery on icy skin tracks. I was slipping all over on kick turns on the way up bloody mtn while tgapp (on his BMTs) had no issues. I'm sure some of it was technique and skins etc, but that extra rocker on the BC90s likely contributed. Wasn't a huge deal, just put on the ski crampons and away we went, but I thought I'd mention it because it is a pretty direct comparison with the BMT94.

Attachment 493844Attachment 493845Attachment 493846

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

The Pomoca Climb Pro S-Glide skins are great for these skis. Great grip on icy snow as long as it’s not too much steep side hill/traversing. I like using ski crampons in those conditions regardless of the ski.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums