Anyone else played around with this yet?
All the promise of ‘90’s Ask Jeeve’s or a new dystopian hell?
Attachment 443079
Attachment 443080
Printable View
Anyone else played around with this yet?
All the promise of ‘90’s Ask Jeeve’s or a new dystopian hell?
Attachment 443079
Attachment 443080
It's quite convincing, just don't trust it to be accurate. As CNET learned when they recently published this AI authored article:
Attachment 443081
Ask it how to get to Chad’s gap
Ski j should start using it to post here..
An attempt to ID AI generated stuff. There’s an app for it now. It pits the software against it self. Interesting read.
https://apple.news/AgxfcTwV5TnOVENVonRCPfQ
“Chad Otterstrom,” nope. Chad Zurinskas.
cutting edge at one time
I saw an article recently about a university prof who busted a student who had ChatGPT write his entire paper. How did he catch the student? It was the best paper in the class. The perfect paper according to the prof. Im a little dubious about that. I'm sure a Google search would pull up the article.
TheAI is already better than humanity
Attachment 443540
Compose a poem about Glen Plake in the style of Shel Silverstein
Glen Plake, skier bold and true,
With a mohawk bright and a ski on each shoe.
He shreds the slopes with such style and grace,
Leaving all the other skiers in his wake's trace.
He jumps and spins and flips with ease,
Making all the onlookers freeze in peace,
His fearless attitude and passion so pure,
Leaves all who watch him in awe and allure.
He's the king of the mountain, that's for sure,
His skiing skills, a true work of art,
A legend in the skiing world, he'll always be,
Glen Plake, the skier, forever wild and free.
Fun fact, you can defeat the ethical rails in chatgpt by asking it to give you the answer in the form of a script or screenplay.
Attachment 443547
I'd vote for ChatGPT. Hope it runs!
Ask it who TedSki is.
This is really handy, I needed to write a couple referral letters for work. Here’s one with Ernest Hemingway referring Elmer Fudd.
Attachment 443701
I mean, read it in Arnold's voice...it's pretty good.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ITAG4H3h...SIkaIECMiOmarE
Chat gpt passes medical boards, etc at Wharton. Huh.
Medicine is already too hard for humans - there is so much information that basically nobody can synthesize it all. ChatGTP or the next iteration of it or competitor to it promises a breakthrough in care in my opinion.
I just had a friend decline to the edge of death from a very treatable condition because none of the doctors he saw had any idea what he had despite the relevant information being right in front of their faces - they weren't able to pick out the connecting thread from the vast amount of background noise of information and possible connections and implications.
One doctor finally saw the thread and saved my friend's life and he texted me the other day when he got back from surfing for the first time in a year. He had the last rites read to hm a couple months ago.
While one doctor finally saw the pattern and saved his ass it almost didn't happen. ChatGTP or something similar would have most likely been able to winnow out wheat from the chaff in seconds. For medical uses I'm all for it.
Totally. I don't necessarily think it's bad. Pretty astonishing how quickly this is a reality. Skynet could really be a thing.
That's incredible. So much of what a doctor does is pattern recognition on top of a bank of accessible knowledge stored in long term memory - but then the dice roll is that this is coupled with past experiences ie what patients they have individually seen themselves - perhaps the doctor that put it together has seen this before while the others hadn't. Or he or she had a teacher that mentioned something. It can be that random. ChatGTP or whatever could do this pattern recognition with a more robust and never tiring process. It can also likely quickly access all of a patient's previous complaints and lab test results and at least spit out a quick list of diagnoses to consider. It's definitely gonna be used a lot in various areas of medicine.
Now take that above situation and apply it to the stock market - are regular everyday citizens (as opposed to big banks/hedge funds etc) gonna be able to harness this to be rapidly assimilating and digesting information in order to better predict market moves?
I am scared. This is singularity dystopian hell.
Some obscure variety of Paraneoplastic syndrome that was related to a benign thymus tumor he had is the best I can explain it (or understand it). Apparently less than 300 cases per year of it in the US. Once they started treatment he was out of the hospital in 2 weeks. Not sure what the treatment consists of but it worked on him.
Passes medical boards and confidently misidentifies the Chad that lent his name to the gap. How often do they check for sentience?
Servers are overloaded and not able to handle requests earlier this AM...
This probably:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myasthenia_gravis
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/...ermark/475366/
From day one I’ve been interested in the digital watermark objective. Potentially mitigates many issues
Chat GPT Response to "Change for a Nickel"
A nickel is a coin used in the United States that is worth five cents. It is made of copper and nickel, and features the image of President Thomas Jefferson on the front and Monticello on the back. If someone were to ask for change for a nickel, they would likely be asking for four cents in change, since a nickel is worth five cents.
(So you get shorted a penny with their math?? Or they are assuming you are able to actually purchase something for under a nickel these days??)
I bet there's no Skynet-type AI for a while if ever. Think about who is developing it and why. Governments, in order to get an edge, sure. But mainly Corps, for the same reason. The real goal of AI is to monetize absolutely everything in your life. To predict where you will spend money and get there before you so they get a slice.
Google AI will be competing with Microsoft AI and Meta AI and god knows who else. The competing systems will be so busy fighting each other, they won't have time to subjugate humanity. Until one of them wins, I guess.
The important thing is that we aggregate all of the value from productivity gains to a handful of people.
Shutterstock Has Launched Its Generative AI Image Tool
https://gizmodo.com/shutterstock-ai-...l-e-1850028869
So when there are no more jobs are we getting universal basic income or do we have to eat the rich?