Can get a deal on a 120 in my size and last. My last 3 boots have been 130.
Printable View
Can get a deal on a 120 in my size and last. My last 3 boots have been 130.
Wait a couple months, you won't have a problem getting a deal on a 130. You'll get a great deal on a whole ski shop if you want.Quote:
Originally Posted by DougW
Without knowing the specific boots, this question isn't really answerable.
The main difference other than color may only be the powerstrap or liner, which many people replace anyway. If they're 2 completely different boots, it's not really comparable the way you are asking anyway due to the differences in fit/flex between models and their constructions.
same line Technica Mach 1 LV , 130 vs 120
As the keystone of your gear set-up, I'd question going to a softer boot because it's cheap.
If you needed more flex, then prolly; Otherwise you'll likely suffer for it. And todays boots aren't the same as they once were. A 130 used to be a bitch to ski in, now it's a 150.
My Lange rx130's feel like 110's warm and 120 cold. Only occasionally do I want them racy stiff and I can just crank them to uncomfortable to make me believe I'm there...:nonono2:
And there seem to be some deals over on the gear swap thread right now.
That's just one bum's opinion.
You are considering this to save money, or because you think you want a softer boot?
I have the same boot as you in a 120 flex. I weigh 160 and it is very responsive and has a very even flex. I didn’t get to ski this spring so no warm weather review but buying a boot that your to lite or not strong enough to flex is not a good choice
can't find my size in LV/130 which I would buy , its just pondering a maybe to save money, no rush as only one year on my current bootsQuote:
Originally Posted by gregL
I'd imagine that you you are in a Tecnica 130 and go down to a 120 with say Power Wraps, you wouldn't even notice a difference.
Are they even that different?
I've been wondering why so many companies are making 130 and 120 boots. Figured it had more to do with features than outright flex. And yeah, swapping to an Intuition Powerwrap probably bounces one of the biggest possible feature differences.
And you've been happy in the Mach 1 LV 130?
Legitimate reasons to go to the 120 might be: You've lost weight. Your skiing preferences or habits have changed. You are spending more time skiing with kids/wife/teaching. You only plan to ski mellow powder from here on. You get the drift.
Saving $100 probably isn't one of them. Assuming northern Italy makes it through the COVID-19 crisis, they will build more LV 130's.
PS Not sure if they have your size, but evo's price on the LV 120 is only $70 cheaper than the LV 130 at the moment . . .
Keep in mind for many boot manufacturers there is a big difference in 130 vs 120 boots. 130s have better shells, liners, tongues, power straps. I haven't skied in Technica for a while so not sure about that brand.
It's starting to make sense now...at 5'10" and between 205-220lbs,( depending upon my Autumn berries and general fattening for winter )The rx 130 is gonna feel softer to me than lotsa lighter mags.
Yeah, I'd hold tight for deals on the ideal boot for you. There's a ton more hanging in shops right now than in a usual summer. When things loosen up, I'd bet on a flood of gear.
Like Djongo says, shitload of gear watching dust settle on it right now.
Are Tecnicas even made in Italy anymore?Quote:
Originally Posted by Quandary
So ....? You're a hoarder? Or just COV-19 panic buying?Quote:
Originally Posted by DougW
Actually, I do this very thing: find a good, near-perfect boot, buy at least one (2 is probably better, cuz perfect boots are perfect) extra. Especially if it's taken you years, if not decades, to find said boot.
Sure. Giavera del Montello, east of Montebelluna.Quote:
Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn
Cool!
about that, get a boot, ski it, like it and then next year try to find same boot or year after model on sale. Or equal , couldn't find my Lange banshee in size so got Rossi squad 130 form same model year. Only details were different.Quote:
Originally Posted by PB
I'm about 230 lbs, could stand to lose 20, and bought a 120 Flex Technica because I needed a wide last (106) and that was the stiffest wide boot they made
It's generally fine. The only time I feel it's too soft is when I'm trying to drive race skis on the groomers. And they can be a bit soft in the spring.
Everywhere else it's a non issue, and probably preferred when skiing off piste.
All things being equal I'd prefer a stiffer boot, but it's not like 120 is a noodle.
Tecnica's replaced the Ten.2 HVL with the Mach 1 HV and it's available in a 130. Atomic has the Hawx Magna 130. Neither is a stated 106mm last, but both have tons of volume and can easily be made 106mm in the forefoot. Rossi Track 130 is also huge.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tortoise
yeah, probably not a good idea, could go Cochise which only a 1mm more last or the MV but I can wait, I've got two years as only have 50 days on my boots . Just mussing as was looking at some skis.
I skied 120 flex boots for a bunch of years and then got a screaming deal on a pair of Cochise 130s, with the idea that I might like to ski them(if Mntion could make them wide enough) when it was warm out. Turns out I prefer the 130 over the 120, and am only going to ski the 120 when it’s really cold out.
But I get where you’re coming from, I keep watching for another pair of cheap Cochise Pros to hide away for a rainy day.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Ok , how about not as a future replacement but a quiver? Still going to put on 200 days on a pair of boots so my current Mach 1 130s will just last longer. How about getting a pair of Cochise 130 , abit softer , abit lighter and has a walk mode, for those days when going to do some hikes?
And, not or.
I like the Cochise because of the grippy soles. But I ski 916s, so I can put almost any toe in them and they'll work.
Yep, they came out with it the year after I bought my boots.Quote:
Originally Posted by gregL
Technica have always fit great so they'll likely be my next boot.
Sweet blog.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I am in a rx120 and have been for a decade. The only time I wish they were more stiff is on really warm spring days. Even then I make them work. Just stay balanced.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Around here we never set bindings below 18, but the good news is you're now singed up for endless email subscriptions.Quote:
Originally Posted by PETERSON.ERIC.D@GMAIL.COM
Once you tele you realize you can ski without forward pressure.
Then again I love Lange 130 flex
Not over buckled. I ain’t no racer. Not unbuckling on each lift.
But feeling locked into the ski is fun.
If 120 is your thing go for it.
At the 120-130 end of the spectrum, fit is more important than flex unless you're 200 plus pounds and ski aggressively. I skied a RX120 for a year or two and it was fine except warm spring days where it got pretty soft. I ran them with Zipfits and a Booster.
Same, my 120s with booster straps and zipfits are plenty stiff for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by schindlerpiste
Forgot about this. Feeling a huge difference, way more than 10% or whatever. Its fun on a soft day to be on a soft boot. The softer boot is gripwalk with walk mode so maybe softer than mach 120.
Overall way more soft difference than I thought there would be. No regrets as I'll put 50 days on then and its a neat feeling .
adding I've only skiied them on a remounted pair of BD 188 megawatts 120mm under foot. Picked up a pair of Head attack super cheap and mounted them up. Couldn't give the skis away. Been fun. Boots are supper easy to get on and feel like slippers in comparison and fit right out of box compared to Mach 130 that I;m still doing some work on after what 6 years and I've got gross feet. Don't have the same edge feel as extension of my body, feel more the snow under foot.