outdoor gear companies aren't making it off the core
Article in the New Yorker talks about growth in climbing gyms, luring twenty-somethings, and where the bottom line lies. An interesting statistic came up:
Quote:
A recent study by the Outdoor Industry Association estimated that this urban demographic now accounts for thirty-three per cent of spending in the outdoor market, even if many in that number have yet to venture onto a real rock face. (The O.I.A. tracks sales trends in apparel and equipment for activities that run the gamut from trail running to indoor climbing, though does not make the break-out numbers for individual markets public.) By way of comparison, what the study calls “outdoor natives”—people who wear Tevas year-round, for example, or go on jaunts to Annapurna—make up only seventeen per cent of spending on gear and clothing. Which means there’s plenty of money to be made from climbing’s drift into the mainstream.
I guess probably less than 17% if we're talking The North Face. Relevant fact if you own or work in an outdoor shop - barneys are gonna pay your bills.
outdoor gear companies aren't making it off the core
Outdoor is one of the fastest growing segments of the consumer discretionary industry so a lot of the brands these days are owned by super huge co's ie VF Corp and jarden
They are realizing they don't need the core bc now they are getting the masses. (If they choose their brand acquisitions wisely)
Not sure if ultimately good or bad for people like us (gear whores)
Black diamond tried this recently though and it hasn't worked out as well financially. I think maybe bc they were targeting more 'core' brands in their portfolio