Originally Posted by
californiagrown
when cars slow down from 45mph to 15mph to follow a cyclist for 10 secs in order to not cut them off turning right, they almost always scare the piss out of the cyclist who can clearly hear a car (that he expects is going 45mph like all the rest of traffic that day) pulling up directly behind and not beside. Its an interesting question- do you pull ahead and make your turn forcing the cyclist to possibly brake a bit or coast a bit and loose momentum, or do you slow way down for 10seconds to make the turn behind the cyclist, but holding up the car traffic behind you? Who should you inconvenience? My personal experience is that cyclist (myself included on long rides, not city commuting) are usually zoned the fuck out and just spinning focused on staying in their lane not expecting to have to use their brakes... many/most wont even have their hands on the brakes if they have drop bars. Unlike cars where (speaking for myself) im always paying attention to the traffic in front of me anticipating when to brake.
Personally, when in a car i try and treat cyclist like idiots and give them a fat safety buffer expecting them to be unsafe. That said, the reason i do that is because my experience is that most cyclist want to be treated like car traffic, until they are actually expected to react and operate like car traffic. At the end of the day, when you hop on a bicycle or motorbike and ride in the street here in america, you are voluntarily making yourself harder to see, not only because you are smaller than a car, but because you are the minority road user and the human brain is looking for car-sized objects to avoid when scanning the roadway, not ALL objects. Its the reason why 95% of people don't see the gorilla when asked to count the number of ball passes.