I was thinking exactly the same thing after skiing there earlier this month for the first time…
Pluses were that it was a clinic that fulfilled my PSIA continuing education requirement, combined with an inline skating clinic that same morning in a closed-off section of the parking garage.
Then that evening I went road biking with a friend in Greenwich, and the next morning had lunch with a friend in Manhattan.
Also hit up the Pick A Brick walls at the Lego stores in both the mall and Rockefeller Center for our daughter’s massive Lego city.
The mall was also a wonderfully overwhelming shock to the senses. Quite busy on a Sunday. The two most easily identically subgroups were Metallica fans (in identical tshirts) and Orthodox Jews (no Charedi, but still obvious to any secular Jew).
Minuses are that the pluses from this visit are almost entirely unrelated to the actual skiing as per the above write up.
The claimed vertical of 160’ might be realistic given that it seemed about two thirds of my memories of coaching college teams at 240’ Nashoba.
My Garmin watch recorded laps somehow but wouldn’t record vertical or position:
https://strava.app.link/CNrgqmTFmCb
However, nothing like two thirds as worthwhile as Nashoba. And Nashoba was marginal, although I could set a useful slalom training course there.
By poaching the far left of the trauma park, underneath the dormant poma, ducking occasionally, and snug up against the wall, where the snow wasn’t pulverized noncohesiveness, I felt like I got about six good turns on my slalom skis. The flatter runout at the bottom was worthlessly slow given the loose snow. And watch out for the partly buried orb. And the metal support corners of the lift line corral.
Even just a 300’ vertical hill in Connecticut would be far better. Doesn’t have to be a former ski area. Could even face south. Seems like being on a hill would be so less costly to construct and to refrigerate.
The new one in Norway is like that. Video of slalom training there looked decent.