- If you start letting the FS use a CE to cut large commercially viable trees, you aren't far away from them using it as an excuse to cut old growth or cut in sensitive areas or increase logging to an unsustainable level under the guise of "fire mitigation" without any public input and short cutting a bunch of environmental review. (I tend to agree that a 29,000 acre project would seem to be challenging to fit into a CE.)
- Outside groups play a big role in checking if the agencies are following NEPA. This is a outside group making the agency go through the legal motions to justify their actions.
- Tying the agencies in regulatory knots so they can't accomplish anything that goes against the goals of the litigant.
- The last admin was trying to push using regulatory mechanisms to get around NEPA and ESA reviews because they have an ideological position that is opposite the goals of those two pieces of legislation and would be happy to see them dumped in the trash can.
I'm guessing that a much smaller project, say something with a small footprint around a particular resource (campground, ranger station, etc) would fit the intent of the CE much better versus this large project (29,000 acres is 45 square miles) and would not have generated this lawsuit.
Here is Oregon Wilds press release:
https://www.oregonwild.org/about/press/conservation-groups-challenge-fremont-winema-logging-project