Originally Posted by MassLiberal
Your sophomoric arguments only serve to show just how far your head is up your ass. You might want to educate yourself on world history prior to making analogies between Zarqawi and Hitler, as it was Liberal interventionalists, and not conservative Isolationists who finally dealt with Hitler.
Also, the difference between state actors (Hitler) and products of ideologies (zarqawi) is profoundly different. But the point is moot, since the Iraq war has nothing to do with Al Queda. In reality, Zarqawi was a pretty small fry in this whole operation, blown up in importance by the Defense department in order to mislead the public into believing that this mis adventure was about defeating terrorism.
In actuality, this war was nothing but a roll of the dice in the world wide game of international politics. The Neoconservative architects of the Iraq policy wanted to reverse what they perceived as the decline of American power and influence abroad. A victory in Iraq, they thought, would greatly strenghthen their hand in dealing with other, emerging powers such as Korea, Iran and Venezuela. Unfortunately, they were so wedded to the notion of re-establishing american dominance internationally that they destroyed age old alliances and trashed America's ability to act unilaterally in the future.
Celebrate Zarqawi's death. One less terrorist mother fucker to deal with. It is only to bad that the administration rushed into this was without listening to the advise of its generals, hurting the "war on terror" that you so desperately believe in.
