Originally Posted by
thebirdhunter
That makes no sense, wtf does that even mean?
"I don't call it wilderness personally unless I can't see real hard signs of "man" when I look 360 degrees."
In your vast travels out west where have you been where you couldn't see signs of man?
Have you ever been to the top of the Grand? No need to answer I already know the answer to that. Guess what, you can see real hard signs of man from up there. You telling me that's not wilderness?
I've been to the top of peaks in the Lost River Range, the Lemhi Range, the Madison Range, the Wind Rivers, the Gore, the Gros Ventre, the Uintas, the Centennials, the Big Horns, the Rubys, the Sawtooths, the Snake River Range and many more and you can see signs of man from all of them. Tell me that where you can be mauled by a grizz at any moment is not wilderness. The only wilderness areas I've been where you couldn't see signs of man are the Selway, Frank Church and the Jarbidge.
Go ahead now, tell us where you've been that meet your criteria of wilderness.
go on now or go wait in the backseat of the car.