SSU insolvency and the bike industry generally
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sfotex
Skis are a lot simpler/cheaper to make and the supply chain is nowhere near as complex as bikes - edges, base material, wood. etc. that can be used on a new model (within reason) vs. what are we going to do with the 10,000 SuperBoost cranksets we ordered 2 years ago and already paid for?
Press a new top sheet on last years model and its this years model vs. a bike with parts from how many factories.
Kind of simplified, but you get the idea..... and there's a lot more money in 'resort' skiing to keep stuff going. vs. buying a bike and riding trails for free.
Yeah, when it comes to high end bikes there really is just SRAM and Shimano for drivetrains, and Shimano did not increase capacity. I’m sure ski binding tooling has some specialized production, but the ski binding market is also way more diversified than just two global producers making the bulk of high quality bindings! But yeah the BOM and subassembly processes for bikes are way way way deeper than skis. And bindings. Boots might be closer to bike frames but that’s a wild guess on my part.
I also sense that there was a greater pull forward effect for all of cycling segments in 2020 and 2021 versus what we saw as crowds in 2021 at ski resorts. One, there is probably a greater natural saturation for skiing versus cycling - just way more places where people can do the latter vs the former. Ski areas also had less time under stay at home and work from home periods; they closed in March 2020 and didn’t reopen until the following season. Bike brands canceled manufacturing orders in what, Feb and March 2020, and then got the signals that consumers stuck at home really wanted bikes in what, May?, after all the US and Europe fiscal backstops were put in place?