Originally Posted by
ExPowderSnob
I don't mean this to be cold-hearted, but it can be very cruel to go to great lengths to keep our 4 legged furbuckets alive when they are past their time. It can be way too easy to put our own needs and feelings in front of our dog's, and in the end, that can be more cruel then anything else.
While we may be content with an old crippled dog laying at our feet, the dog may not be. They can hide pain and suffering much better than we will ever realize. The first priority MUST be the dog's quality of life, not our own resistance to death being a part of the circle of life. No one would ever argue how much pain we can feel with loss, especially with a pack member who shared our lives over the last decade, but it can pale in comparison to what an old dog can live through when their time on earth has come to an end.
We shouldn't look at euthanasia as a means to an end, but rather a gift to give to an old friend. A gift that frees them from paralyzing arthritis, day in and day out aching and pain, and ultimately a life that our indoor wolves shouldn't have to experience.
Dogs, despite our best efforts to domesticate and train them as companions, are still wild beasts at heart. Wild beasts that need to run, and play, and chase, and swim and howl at the moon. When they lose the ability to do that, when they can't walk, much less run, when they are sore and aching just from napping in the living room, when it takes all the energy they have to just make it into the kitchen for breakfast, it is not fair to them to go to long lengths to prolong their lives. It's actually quite selfish. When we do that, we procrastinate the psychological pain we will feel with their loss and exchange it for physical pain they feel everyday. We shouldn't burden them with our own weaknesses when they are already sick and old. I can't think of much that would be be more cruel than that.